OFF TO THE RACES

The Unfolding Republican Nightmare

Once upon a time, the GOP looked to expand its majorities in the House and Senate. But now, dragged down by Trump, the party is scrambling to keep a narrow advantage in both chambers.

AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana
Charlie Cook
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Charlie Cook
May 18, 2017, 8 p.m.

If a Demo­crat had a night­mare a year ago, it might well look like what happened in last Novem­ber’s elec­tions. If a Re­pub­lic­an had a night­mare on the eve of Pres­id­ent Trump’s in­aug­ur­a­tion, it might well look like the last 118 days. After a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign that was, start to fin­ish, the strangest in memory, this has been the strangest trans­ition and first four months of a pres­id­ency that any of us have seen. Re­mem­ber when Jeb Bush was the front-run­ner for the GOP nom­in­a­tion and Hil­lary Clin­ton was go­ing to have a free ride to the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion, with the gen­er­al elec­tion shap­ing up as a joust between the two dyn­asties?

The only good news for Re­pub­lic­ans this week is that they don’t have to say a whole lot about Trump’s leg­al situ­ation every day. I asked sev­er­al of the most re­spec­ted Re­pub­lic­an cam­paign con­sult­ants in the busi­ness on Thursday morn­ing, the day after the ap­point­ment of Robert Mueller as spe­cial coun­sel, what they were telling their cli­ents on Cap­it­ol Hill. As one vet­er­an GOP cam­paign con­sult­ant put it, “The Rus­si­an mat­ter is un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion by a re­spec­ted pro­sec­utor, and they shouldn’t com­ment on any mat­ter un­der in­vest­ig­a­tion.” Simple as that.

As a gen­er­al strategy, an­oth­er top GOP ad­viser said, “You need to straddle. There are right-wing­ers in the primary who won’t aban­don Trump and you can’t af­ford to piss too many of them off. So something like this: The Pres­id­ent tweets too much, and as far as the Rus­sia in­vest­ig­a­tion is con­cerned, we don’t know what it will find, but let the chips fall where they may. The tur­moil in the White House is get­ting in the way of some of the good things Trump wants to do, like de­reg­u­la­tion, sim­pli­fy­ing the tax code, lower­ing rates, and re­form­ing Obama­care. We need to re­solve all this as quickly as pos­sible so we can get back to the busi­ness of restor­ing eco­nom­ic growth.”

An­oth­er offered this guid­ance: “Keep your polit­ic­al head on a swiv­el. Go too far in one dir­ec­tion, and you draw a primary chal­lenge. Go too far in the oth­er, and it is harder to sep­ar­ate from Trump if he goes down.” That same con­sult­ant ad­ded, “Con­gress needs to post some suc­cesses.”

How ser­i­ously should a Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ate take the cur­rent situ­ation? One of the con­sult­ants said, “This is a hor­rible en­vir­on­ment for Re­pub­lic­ans run­ning cam­paigns.” The spe­cial elec­tion on June 20 in Geor­gia’s 6th Dis­trict, for ex­ample, is very close when it shouldn’t be. “That’s all due to Trump. The pres­id­ent quite lit­er­ally cre­ated Jon Os­soff [the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee], who is oth­er­wise an un­im­press­ive can­did­ate.” For the Re­pub­lic­ans, it’s pretty scary that their can­did­ate, former Geor­gia Sec­ret­ary of State Kar­en Han­del, who has no dir­ect con­nec­tion to Trump or any taint from pri­or con­gres­sion­al ser­vice, is fa­cing such strong head­winds. It is par­tic­u­larly scary for a sit­ting Re­pub­lic­an law­maker who may have cast a con­tro­ver­sial vote or two on health care and has little to show for his party’s ma­jor­ity in the House since 2010 and the Sen­ate since 2014. It’s hard to blame former Pres­id­ent Obama for the lack of le­gis­la­tion ac­tion this year.

One of the biggest chal­lenges for Re­pub­lic­ans these days is that most of the party faith­ful around the coun­try are reas­on­ably sat­is­fied with the way things are go­ing. More than 90 per­cent say that they would vote for Don­ald Trump again, even if they’re dis­ap­poin­ted with what has or hasn’t happened, while Demo­crats are mad­der than hell and in­cred­ibly mo­tiv­ated.

Lower-turnout midterm elec­tions are of­ten dom­in­ated by voters who are angry and look­ing to send a mes­sage. For the mo­ment, the Demo­crats have a big edge in this re­gard. A pos­sible Su­preme Court va­cancy and loom­ing nom­in­a­tion fight could well mo­tiv­ate the Re­pub­lic­an base and get con­ser­vat­ives back in­to the fight, and it’s hard to see Demo­crats more mo­tiv­ated than they already are. But aside from the Su­preme Court, it’s hard to think of an is­sue that would tur­bocharge the GOP base right now. Re­pub­lic­ans are in a deep funk. Many have even stopped watch­ing Fox News.

Midterm elec­tions are rarely dull and of­ten ex­plos­ive, and 2018 doesn’t fig­ure to be an ex­cep­tion. With the Re­pub­lic­an ma­jor­ity in the House on a knife’s edge, and with the Re­pub­lic­ans look­ing just to hold onto the Sen­ate in­stead of mak­ing the big gains they once hoped for, the stakes couldn’t be much high­er.

What We're Following See More »
TOOTHLESS?
UN Security Council Condemns N. Korea Launch
29 minutes ago
THE LATEST
HAD SOUGHT INFO ON LOBBYISTS IN ADMINISTRATION
White House Snubs OGE’s Request for Info on Waivers
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration, in a significant escalation of its clash with the government’s top ethics watchdog, has moved to block an effort to disclose any ethics waivers granted to former lobbyists who now work in the White House or federal agencies." The White House sent a letter to OGE head Walter Shaub, which "challenged his legal authority to demand the information. Dozens of former lobbyists and industry lawyers are working in the Trump administration, which has hired them at a much higher rate than the previous administration. Keeping the waivers confidential would make it impossible to know whether any such officials are violating federal ethics rules or have been given a pass to ignore them."

Source:
NIKKI HALEY HEADING FOR ANKARA
Turkey Summons U.S. Ambassador
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
THOMAS JOINS COURT’S LIBERALS
Court Rules Against NC Voting Districts, Says They Were Racially Motivated
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that racial considerations pervaded the way North Carolina lawmakers drew congressional maps after the 2010 Census in order to maximize Republicans' advantage. The 5-3 ruling, written by Justice Elena Kagan, was the latest in a series of decisions by the justices against the excessive use of race in redistricting, the decennial process of drawing new district lines for Congress and state legislatures. Justice Clarence Thomas joined the court's four liberal justices in striking down the state's maps."

Source:
UNANIMOUS DECISION
SCOTUS Rules Against Venue Shopping in Patent Cases
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Writing for an 8-0 Supreme Court on Monday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that patent lawsuits "must be brought in the state where the defendant company is incorporated. ... The ruling likely spells an end to the near-monopoly the federal court in the Eastern District of Texas holds in handling patent cases. Plaintiffs for decades have filed suits in that pro-plaintiff district based on a broader interpretation of venue that made suits possible almost anywhere."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login