Putin Eyes ‘High-Precision’ Arms as Partial Nuclear-Weapons Alternative

Russian President Vladimir Putin, shown last month, has called for Moscow to heighten its focus on conventional arms that he describes as emerging as an "equal" to nuclear arms in their deterrent capacity.
National Journal
Diane Barnes, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Diane Barnes, Global Security Newswire
Dec. 3, 2013, 4:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Ad­vanced con­ven­tion­al weapons are emer­ging as an “equal” to atom­ic arms in their ca­pa­city to ward off ag­gres­sion, un­der­lin­ing a need for Mo­scow to bol­ster its fo­cus on their de­vel­op­ment, Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin told seni­or of­fi­cials in com­ments re­leased last week.

Putin’s re­marks — is­sued to a Krem­lin gath­er­ing on the pre­par­a­tion of “long-range high-pre­ci­sion weapons” — might partly refer to con­ven­tion­al “hy­per­son­ic” arms un­der de­vel­op­ment in Rus­sia as a re­sponse to a “prompt glob­al strike” cap­ab­il­ity sought by the United States. However, the gov­ern­ment-re­leased tran­script does not spe­cific­ally identi­fy which weapons he be­lieves are in need of “an ad­ded boost” in de­vel­op­ment ef­forts by Mo­scow.

“High-pre­ci­sion weapons are be­com­ing an in­creas­ingly im­port­ant factor in non-nuc­le­ar de­terrence, and per­haps even one of the most de­cis­ive factors,” Putin said in a meet­ing tran­script pub­lished last Fri­day.

“The de­gree of pre­ci­sion and power of today’s high-pre­ci­sion weapons makes them es­sen­tially an al­tern­at­ive to nuc­le­ar weapons,” he con­tin­ued. “In some of their para­met­ers they are quite simply equal to nuc­le­ar weapons in their ef­fect­ive­ness.”

A fu­ture long-range, rap­id-strike cap­ab­il­ity has been seen by some in the United States as a par­tial al­tern­at­ive to nuc­le­ar weapons for hit­ting im­port­ant time-sens­it­ive tar­gets. The cap­ab­il­ity sought by Wash­ing­ton could al­low U.S. forces to con­duct a non-nuc­le­ar strike against any loc­a­tion in the world in one hour or less.

In Ju­ly, a deputy Rus­si­an de­fense min­is­ter sug­ges­ted that his na­tion’s mil­it­ary would not be­gin to re­ceive hy­per­son­ic de­liv­ery sys­tems — a pos­sible ana­logue to the U.S. prompt glob­al strike tech­no­logy — un­til 2018 at the earli­est.

In Fri­day’s tran­script, though, Putin said his na­tion had already star­ted sup­ply­ing its mil­it­ary with the “high-pre­ci­sion weapons” un­der dis­cus­sion.

Fri­day’s ex­change came on the heels of tran­scripts re­leased earli­er in the week from Krem­lin meet­ings that ad­dressed land-, sea- and air-based ele­ments of the Rus­si­an nuc­le­ar de­terrent.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER LAST WEEK
McCain Returning for Health Care Vote
4 hours ago
THE LATEST
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login