Putin Eyes ‘High-Precision’ Arms as Partial Nuclear-Weapons Alternative

Russian President Vladimir Putin, shown last month, has called for Moscow to heighten its focus on conventional arms that he describes as emerging as an "equal" to nuclear arms in their deterrent capacity.
National Journal
Diane Barnes, Global Security Newswire
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Diane Barnes, Global Security Newswire
Dec. 3, 2013, 4:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Ad­vanced con­ven­tion­al weapons are emer­ging as an “equal” to atom­ic arms in their ca­pa­city to ward off ag­gres­sion, un­der­lin­ing a need for Mo­scow to bol­ster its fo­cus on their de­vel­op­ment, Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin told seni­or of­fi­cials in com­ments re­leased last week.

Putin’s re­marks — is­sued to a Krem­lin gath­er­ing on the pre­par­a­tion of “long-range high-pre­ci­sion weapons” — might partly refer to con­ven­tion­al “hy­per­son­ic” arms un­der de­vel­op­ment in Rus­sia as a re­sponse to a “prompt glob­al strike” cap­ab­il­ity sought by the United States. However, the gov­ern­ment-re­leased tran­script does not spe­cific­ally identi­fy which weapons he be­lieves are in need of “an ad­ded boost” in de­vel­op­ment ef­forts by Mo­scow.

“High-pre­ci­sion weapons are be­com­ing an in­creas­ingly im­port­ant factor in non-nuc­le­ar de­terrence, and per­haps even one of the most de­cis­ive factors,” Putin said in a meet­ing tran­script pub­lished last Fri­day.

“The de­gree of pre­ci­sion and power of today’s high-pre­ci­sion weapons makes them es­sen­tially an al­tern­at­ive to nuc­le­ar weapons,” he con­tin­ued. “In some of their para­met­ers they are quite simply equal to nuc­le­ar weapons in their ef­fect­ive­ness.”

A fu­ture long-range, rap­id-strike cap­ab­il­ity has been seen by some in the United States as a par­tial al­tern­at­ive to nuc­le­ar weapons for hit­ting im­port­ant time-sens­it­ive tar­gets. The cap­ab­il­ity sought by Wash­ing­ton could al­low U.S. forces to con­duct a non-nuc­le­ar strike against any loc­a­tion in the world in one hour or less.

In Ju­ly, a deputy Rus­si­an de­fense min­is­ter sug­ges­ted that his na­tion’s mil­it­ary would not be­gin to re­ceive hy­per­son­ic de­liv­ery sys­tems — a pos­sible ana­logue to the U.S. prompt glob­al strike tech­no­logy — un­til 2018 at the earli­est.

In Fri­day’s tran­script, though, Putin said his na­tion had already star­ted sup­ply­ing its mil­it­ary with the “high-pre­ci­sion weapons” un­der dis­cus­sion.

Fri­day’s ex­change came on the heels of tran­scripts re­leased earli­er in the week from Krem­lin meet­ings that ad­dressed land-, sea- and air-based ele­ments of the Rus­si­an nuc­le­ar de­terrent.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
10 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
10 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
11 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×