WASHINGTON — Advanced conventional weapons are emerging as an “equal” to atomic arms in their capacity to ward off aggression, underlining a need for Moscow to bolster its focus on their development, Russian President Vladimir Putin told senior officials in comments released last week.
Putin’s remarks — issued to a Kremlin gathering on the preparation of “long-range high-precision weapons” — might partly refer to conventional “hypersonic” arms under development in Russia as a response to a “prompt global strike” capability sought by the United States. However, the government-released transcript does not specifically identify which weapons he believes are in need of “an added boost” in development efforts by Moscow.
“High-precision weapons are becoming an increasingly important factor in non-nuclear deterrence, and perhaps even one of the most decisive factors,” Putin said in a meeting transcript published last Friday.
“The degree of precision and power of today’s high-precision weapons makes them essentially an alternative to nuclear weapons,” he continued. “In some of their parameters they are quite simply equal to nuclear weapons in their effectiveness.”
A future long-range, rapid-strike capability has been seen by some in the United States as a partial alternative to nuclear weapons for hitting important time-sensitive targets. The capability sought by Washington could allow U.S. forces to conduct a non-nuclear strike against any location in the world in one hour or less.
In July, a deputy Russian defense minister suggested that his nation’s military would not begin to receive hypersonic delivery systems — a possible analogue to the U.S. prompt global strike technology — until 2018 at the earliest.
In Friday’s transcript, though, Putin said his nation had already started supplying its military with the “high-precision weapons” under discussion.
This article was published in Global Security Newswire, which is produced independently by National Journal Group under contract with the Nuclear Threat Initiative. NTI is a nonprofit, nonpartisan group working to reduce global threats from nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons.
What We're Following See More »
"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.
"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.