Obama: ‘We’re Not Going Back’ On Health Reform

In a speech Tuesday, the president emphasized the importance of the Affordable Care Act and the problems with the status quo.

WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 03: U.S. President Barack Obama embraces Monica Weeks, who introduced him and also benefitted from provisions of the Affordable Care Act, before he addressed supporters on the health care legislation in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building December 3, 2013 in Washington, DC. During the event, Obama defended the reasons why the Affordable Care Act was originally implemented and urged patience with problems with the healthcare.gov website. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
National Journal
Sophie Novack
Add to Briefcase
Sophie Novack
Dec. 3, 2013, 1:42 p.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama has a simple mes­sage for Obama­care crit­ics: “we’re not go­ing back.”

“If I’ve got to fight an­oth­er three years to make sure this law works, then that’s what I’ll do,” he said at an event Tues­day af­ter­noon.

The speech kicked off a new White House cam­paign to re­fo­cus the Obama­care nar­rat­ive on the pos­it­ives of the law, fol­low­ing two months of neg­at­ive cov­er­age of the troubled rol­lout of Health­Care.gov. Now that the con­sumer ex­per­i­ence side of the ex­change web­site is largely fixed, the ad­min­is­tra­tion plans to spend the next three weeks lead­ing up to the first en­roll­ment dead­line on Dec. 23 by pub­li­ciz­ing the be­ne­fits of the Af­ford­able Care Act.

The Pres­id­ent’s speech today was a more force­ful de­fense of the law than has been giv­en in re­cent weeks, and in­dic­ated a clear mes­sage go­ing for­ward: the status quo is not an op­tion.

“If you ask many of the op­pon­ents of this law what ex­actly they’d do dif­fer­ently, their an­swer seems to be, well, let’s go back to the way things used to be,” he said, ex­plain­ing that the law’s op­pon­ents have yet to co­alesce around a vi­able health care al­tern­at­ive.

“If, des­pite all the mil­lions of people who are be­ne­fit­ting from it, you still think this law’s a bad idea, then you’ve got to tell us spe­cific­ally what you’d do dif­fer­ently to cut costs, cov­er more people, make in­sur­ance more se­cure, Obama said. “You can’t just say that the sys­tem was work­ing with 41 mil­lion people without health in­sur­ance.”

The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s strategy is to set up this di­cho­tomy between what is avail­able un­der Obama­care, and what was wrong with the status quo — the de­fault com­par­is­on met­ric since Re­pub­lic­ans have been heavy on calls for re­peal without op­tions to re­place it. 

Obama said the ACA is work­ing and will con­tin­ue to work bet­ter. While he wel­comed sug­ges­tions for how to im­prove the law, he in­sisted re­peal is not go­ing to hap­pen.

“Look, I’ve al­ways said I will work with any­body to im­ple­ment and im­prove this law ef­fect­ively,” he con­tin­ued. “But we’re not re­peal­ing it as long as I’m pres­id­ent. I want every­body to be clear about that. We will make it work for all Amer­ic­ans.”

What We're Following See More »
23 MILLION FEWER INSURED IN 2026
Congressional Budget Office Scores House Trumpcare Bill
44 minutes ago
BREAKING

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its score of the House-passed American Health Care Act, which would replace Obamacare. According to the CBO, the bill would reduce the deficit by $119 billion by 2026, while leaving 14 million more Americans uninsured in 2018 than under current law, a number swelling to 23 million by 2026. Further, insurance premiums would balloon 20 percent in 2018 and five percent in 2019 before the waiver provision in the legislation would kick in. The provision allows states to apply for waivers and permit insurers to offer skimpier plans, which would likely entice younger and healthier individuals to buy health insurance while potentially pricing older and less healthy Americans out of insurance plans. House Republicans approved this bill in late April without waiting for the CBO score.

Source:
GOP DISCORD
Graham Rejects Trump’s Budget In Hearing
44 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Wednesday during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that President Donald Trump's budget is little more than recycling bin material. "The budget proposed by the president doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing," Graham said. Graham had previously opposed the budget over its nearly 30 percent cut to the budget of the State Department. The budget slashes spending on domestic priorities while increasing military spending.

Source:
PREFERS “CLEAN” BILL
Mnuchin Looks To Avoid Debt Ceiling Fight
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS
“THAT’S THE GOAL”
McConnell Not Sure How To Get 50 Votes For Health Care
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said Wednesday that he doesn't yet know the formula towards gaining passage of an Obamacare replacement in the Senate. "I don't know how we get to 50 (votes) at the moment. But that's the goal," McConnell said. The House passed an Obamacare replacement bill which has been widely seen as dead on arrival in the Senate, and McConnell has put together a working group of Republican Senators working towards creating health care legislation which could gain the support of at least 50 Senators.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login