Democrats, Fumbling No More

The party’s offensive on the Affordable Care Act continues.

President Obama throws a football at Soldier Field in Chicago.
National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
Dec. 5, 2013, 10:38 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama re­cently al­lowed that on sev­er­al oc­ca­sions, he and his ad­min­is­tra­tion had “fumbled” with re­gard to the rol­lout of the Af­ford­able Care Act and sug­ges­ted it wouldn’t hap­pen again. “I am very frus­trated,” Obama said, “but I’m also some­body who, if I fumble the ball, you know, I’m go­ing to wait un­til I get the next play, and then I’m go­ing to try to run as hard as I can and do right by the team.” It ap­pears he’s mak­ing good on his word.

In the past few days, Demo­crats have taken up the of­fens­ive on the health care law, sound­ing off on the con­sequences of re­peal for the GOP as part of a three-week drive to re­fo­cus the pub­lic on the law’s be­ne­fits. Buoyed by im­prove­ments in Health­Care.Gov, the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee is tar­get­ing 60 House Re­pub­lic­ans who have cri­ti­cized the Af­ford­able Care Act, blast­ing out state­ments that tout the be­ne­fits of the le­gis­la­tion and link­ing op­pon­ents’ cri­ti­cism of the law with things like im­mun­iz­a­tions for chil­dren and cov­er­ing those with preex­ist­ing con­di­tions. Law­makers in heated races around the coun­try are get­ting in on the ac­tion as well.

In New Jer­sey’s 2nd Dis­trict, Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate Bill Hughes, who’s run­ning in a hotly con­tested race to re­place Rep. Frank Lo­Bi­ondo, called on the con­gress­man to cease his par­ti­cip­a­tion in Re­pub­lic­an at­tacks on the pres­id­ent’s health care law. “Last month, Con­gress­man Frank Lo­Bi­ondo re­peatedly voted to shut down gov­ern­ment and brought us to verge of de­fault, all to ad­vance an agenda that would take South Jer­sey back to a time when in­sur­ance com­pan­ies could deny his con­stitu­ents cov­er­age for hav­ing preex­ist­ing con­di­tions,” wrote Hughes in an email to Garden State res­id­ents. Re­pub­lic­ans’ mis­sion, Hughes con­ten­ded in his missive, is to put in­sur­ance com­pan­ies back in con­trol so that they can drop South Jer­sey fam­il­ies’ cov­er­age at a mo­ment’s no­tice.

An­oth­er blast, sent out by Pete Aguilar, the top Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate in a race to un­seat Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Gary Miller in Cali­for­nia’s 2nd Dis­trict, soun­ded a sim­il­ar tune. “The rol­lout of the Af­ford­able Care Act has not been without its prob­lems,” wrote Aguilar in a blast to voters Wed­nes­day night. “But, re­peal­ing the law is not an op­tion. We can’t go back to put­ting big in­sur­ance com­pan­ies in charge of our health, where preex­ist­ing con­di­tions would ex­clude you from cov­er­age, or where simply be­ing a wo­man would in­crease costs.”

It all soun­ded un­can­nily like the case Steve Is­rael, chair­man of the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee, made on Hard­ball Wed­nes­day night when he ar­gued that House Speak­er John Boehner and fel­low Re­pub­lic­ans were will­fully mis­lead­ing the Amer­ic­an people on the ACA. In a con­ver­sa­tion with Chris Mat­thews, Is­rael summed up the new cam­paign. “They know that they can­not af­ford as Re­pub­lic­ans, polit­ic­ally, for the Af­ford­able Care Act to suc­ceed. And you know what? We’re go­ing on of­fense now. We’re go­ing to let the Amer­ic­an people know that every single Re­pub­lic­an who talks about re­peal­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act is im­pos­ing, for ex­ample, a $1,200 tax on seni­ors by re­open­ing the donut hole. So when these Re­pub­lic­ans talk about re­peal, what they’re talk­ing about is hit­ting the middle class and seni­ors in their pock­et­books.”

Per­haps the DCCC is mak­ing in­roads already. At least one Re­pub­lic­an, Rep. Scott Ri­gell in Vir­gin­ia, has ad­mit­ted the law is ac­tu­ally help­ing some people and that Re­pub­lic­ans would do bet­ter to fo­cus on mak­ing changes to the law, rather than in­sist­ing on out­right re­peal. “It’s not in dis­pute that many Amer­ic­ans’ lives are be­ing dis­rup­ted in an im­port­ant way by this law,” Ri­gell told The New York Times. “Is it also true that some Amer­ic­ans’ lives have got­ten bet­ter? Yes, and to not ac­know­ledge that is to deny real­ity.”

Be­low is an ex­ample of an email the DCCC sent to res­id­ents in Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick’s dis­trict in Pennsylvania. Sim­il­ar in­form­a­tion about preex­ist­ing con­di­tions will be sent out in five dozen Re­pub­lic­an-held dis­tricts.

#Cost­sO­fRe­peal: Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick Would Deny Cov­er­age for 5,489,162 Pennsylvani­ans With Preex­ist­ing Con­di­tions


Be­cause of Con­gress­man Mike Fitzpatrick’s ob­ses­sion with re­peal­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act, 129 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans ““ in­clud­ing 5,489,162 people in Pennsylvania ““ could be denied cov­er­age simply be­cause they have a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion, send­ing us back to the days when in­sur­ance com­pan­ies were free to deny care to people with everything from can­cer to dia­betes to asthma.


Data from the De­part­ment of Health and Hu­man Ser­vices re­veals that since 2010, up to 17 mil­lion chil­dren with pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tions, in­clud­ing 656,877 in Pennsylvania, can no longer be denied care be­cause of their health, and be­gin­ning this Janu­ary, that pro­tec­tion will ex­tend to all adults ““ un­less Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick gets his way, send­ing us back to the old sys­tem where in­sur­ance com­pan­ies were free to deny and drop cov­er­age simply for hav­ing asthma as a child, or even get­ting strep throat.


“Liv­ing in a con­stant state of dread wheth­er your in­sur­ance com­pany might drop you be­cause of a preex­ist­ing con­di­tion is simply wrong, but that’s ex­actly what Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick would do to 5,489,162 Pennsylvani­ans. For all those fam­il­ies, that means Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick’s re­peal plan would rob them of their peace of mind and se­cur­ity and in­stead could drive them in­to bank­ruptcy be­cause of their health con­di­tions,” said Emily Bittner of the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. “While Demo­crats work to im­prove the law to make it work bet­ter for the Amer­ic­an people, Con­gress­man Fitzpatrick is for­ging reck­lessly ahead with his re­peal ob­ses­sion that leaves the 129 mil­lion Amer­ic­ans out in the cold simply be­cause they have preex­ist­ing con­di­tions like asthma or can­cer.”




Re­peal Could Deny Cov­er­age to 129 Mil­lion Amer­ic­ans with Pre-Ex­ist­ing Con­di­tions, In­clud­ing 17 Mil­lion Chil­dren. “As many as 129 mil­lion non-eld­erly Amer­ic­ans have a pre-ex­ist­ing health con­di­tion that puts them at risk of be­ing denied af­ford­able cov­er­age without health care over­haul, ac­cord­ing to a gov­ern­ment re­port. The es­tim­ate rep­res­ents nearly half of Amer­ic­ans young­er than 65, and 86 per­cent of people 55 to 64 [“¦] The act already pro­hib­its in­surers from lim­it­ing life­time cov­er­age to a fixed dol­lar amount or deny­ing cov­er­age to a child young­er than 19 be­cause of a pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tion. As many as 17 mil­lion chil­dren young­er than 18 have a pre-ex­ist­ing con­di­tion, ac­cord­ing to the re­port.” [ABC News, 1/18/11]


House Re­pub­lic­ans Have Voted 46 Times to Re­peal or Dis­mantle the Af­ford­able Care Act.”Re­pub­lic­an elec­ted of­fi­cials have seen the Af­ford­able Care Act as es­sen­tially un­fix­able — that’s why House Re­pub­lic­ans voted 46 times to re­peal or delay the im­ple­ment­a­tion of the law, in­stead of work­ing with the White House over the past three years to identi­fy and solve prob­lems with­in it of the sort that tend to ac­cu­mu­late in any such massive piece of le­gis­la­tion.” [The At­lantic, 11/27/13]
What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
8 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
11 hours ago
Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
16 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."

Trump Admits He’s Behind
16 hours ago
Ron Klain in Line to Be Clinton’s Chief of Staff?
16 hours ago

Sources tell CNN that longtime Democratic operative Ron Klain, who has been Vice President Biden's chief of staff, is "high on the list of prospects" to be chief of staff in a Clinton White House. "John Podesta, the campaign chairman, has signaled his interest in joining the Cabinet, perhaps as Energy secretary."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.