House Intel Chair Slams U.S. Outreach to Syria’s Islamist Rebels

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, R-MI, speaks during a press conference to release the Committee's report on the security threat posed by Chinese telecommunications companies Huawei and ZTE October 8, 2012 in the House Visitors Center of the US Capitol in Washington, DC. 
National Journal
Sara Sorcher
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Sara Sorcher
Dec. 5, 2013, 3:27 p.m.

House In­tel­li­gence Chair­man Mike Ro­gers slammed the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s out­reach to Syr­ia’s Is­lam­ist rebels to en­cour­age them to sup­port a peace con­fer­ence early next year, just one day after seni­or of­fi­cials in­dic­ated re­li­gious fight­ers may play a key role in reach­ing a dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion to end the bloody con­flict.

“You should draw lines around or­gan­iz­a­tions that would cut the heads off of chil­dren to prove their polit­ic­al point,” the Michigan Re­pub­lic­an told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “When you don’t have a course of ac­tion that helps change the bat­tle­field, for a dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion, you end up go­ing to the parties who are “¦ rad­ic­al Is­lam­ists. That’s not a very good way to con­duct dip­lomacy.”

Is­lam­ic mil­it­ants, Ro­gers said, “want a safe haven in east­ern Syr­ia and — we know this with a high de­gree of con­fid­ence — to con­duct op­er­a­tions ex­tern­al to Syr­ia. You don’t ne­go­ti­ate with ter­ror­ist groups that have that kind of mind-set.”

The Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted this week that the U.S. and its al­lies are hold­ing dir­ect talks with Is­lam­ist mil­it­ant fac­tions in Syr­ia, as sec­u­lar groups Wash­ing­ton backed in the war against strong­man Bashar al-As­sad con­tin­ue to lose ground to re­li­gious fight­ers and the re­gime. The primary tar­get of this West­ern and Saudi out­reach is the Is­lam­ic Front, a new rebel co­ali­tion of re­li­gious mi­li­tias ex­clud­ing the main al-Qaida-linked groups in the coun­try.

Ro­gers’ com­ments come one day after De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel said “all parties” must be rep­res­en­ted to reach a dip­lo­mat­ic solu­tion in the war-torn coun­try. “This can’t be achieved by just [lim­it­ing ourselves to] nar­row strips of in­terest,” he said Wed­nes­day.

Sep­ar­ately, just days be­fore nuc­le­ar ne­go­ti­ations are set to re­sume in Vi­enna, Ro­gers slammed the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s re­cent deal with Ir­an, say­ing talks are doomed to fall short of ul­ti­mately dis­mant­ling that coun­try’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram. Con­sidered a ma­jor dip­lo­mat­ic break­through to re­solve the dec­ade-long dis­pute, the deal, reached late last month, was hailed by U.S. of­fi­cials as a first step to­ward a last­ing, com­pre­hens­ive agree­ment on Ir­an’s nuc­le­ar pro­gram — though Is­rael and Ir­an hawks in Con­gress have un­leashed a bar­rage of scath­ing cri­ti­cism be­cause the deal could en­able Ir­an to keep en­rich­ing some urani­um. “No, I don’t be­lieve that there will be any dis­mant­ling for their pro­gram,” Ro­gers said, “and I do not be­lieve it’s in the world’s in­terest to al­low Ir­an to have the cap­ab­il­ity to en­rich and pro­cess urani­um.”

“It’s a ter­rible deal,” he con­tin­ued. “That’s why bi­par­tis­an mem­bers of the House and Sen­ate op­pose it, why our Ar­ab League part­ners op­pose it, why Is­rael op­poses it, why some in European par­lia­ments have said, ‘This is not a good deal.’ When you have lost your friends, you’ve lost your Con­gress, and you’ve lost Is­rael, maybe you should re­think your strategy,” he said of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Key points with­in the Nov. 24 deal in­clude keep­ing Ir­an’s urani­um en­rich­ment be­low 5 per­cent (far be­low weapons-grade levels) and neut­ral­iz­ing its stock­pile of 20-per­cent-en­riched urani­um in ex­change for some $7 bil­lion in sanc­tions re­lief. “They’re go­ing to ox­id­ize that 20 [per­cent-en­riched] urani­um — which can be un-ox­id­ized and re­con­ver­ted to fuel in 30 days,” Ro­gers wor­ried.

The best idea for a nuc­le­ar deal, Ro­gers said, is the United Ar­ab Emir­ates’ pro­gram. “It al­lows a peace­ful pro­gram and all the en­rich­ment and pro­cessing to take place out­side the coun­try; “¦ the fuel is brought in­to their fa­cil­ity, the waste product is taken out of the fa­cil­ity,” Ro­gers said. “That’s the gold stand­ard for a peace­ful nuc­le­ar pro­gram.”

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
3 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
5 hours ago
Cook Report: Dems to Pick up 5-7 Seats, Retake Senate
7 hours ago

Since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, on which Donald Trump boasted of sexually assaulting women, "Senate Republicans have seen their fortunes dip, particularly in states like Florida, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada and Pennsylvania," where Hillary Clinton now leads. Jennifer Duffy writes that she now expects Democrats to gain five to seven seats—enough to regain control of the chamber.

"Of the Senate seats in the Toss Up column, Trump only leads in Indiana and Missouri where both Republicans are running a few points behind him. ... History shows that races in the Toss Up column never split down the middle; one party tends to win the lion’s share of them."

Tying Republicans to Trump Now an Actionable Offense
9 hours ago

"Some Republicans are running so far away from their party’s nominee that they are threatening to sue TV stations for running ads that suggest they support Donald Trump. Just two weeks before Election Day, five Republicans―Reps. Bob Dold (R-Ill.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.), David Jolly (R-Fla.), John Katko (R-N.Y.) and Brian Fitzpatrick, a Pennsylvania Republican running for an open seat that’s currently occupied by his brother―contend that certain commercials paid for by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee provide false or misleading information by connecting them to the GOP nominee. Trump is so terrible, these Republicans are essentially arguing, that tying them to him amounts to defamation."

Former Congressman Schock Fined $10,000
9 hours ago

Former Illinois GOP Congressman Aaron Schock "recently agreed to pay a $10,000 fine for making an excessive solicitation for a super PAC that was active in his home state of Illinois four years ago." Schock resigned from Congress after a story about his Downton Abbey-themed congressional office raised questions about how he was using taxpayer dollars.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.