Permanent ‘Doc-Fix’ Looks DOA for 2013

a doctor tends to a patient in the US health care system
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Clara Ritger
Dec. 5, 2013, 4:29 p.m.

Des­pite bi­par­tis­an sup­port, Con­gress is un­likely to pass a per­man­ent “doc-fix” by the end of the year, ac­cord­ing to an of­fi­cial in the House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee. But law­makers need to get a patch in place soon to pre­vent a 20 per­cent cut to phys­i­cians’ pay on Jan. 1.

While the goal with­in Con­gress is still a long-term fix, the of­fi­cial said, the real­ity is that the House will meet for four more days be­fore ad­journ­ing un­til next year.

Just be­fore the Thanks­giv­ing hol­i­day, the Cen­ters for Medi­care and Medi­caid Ser­vices un­veiled a 20 per­cent cut to 2014 doc­tor’s pay­ments for Medi­care ser­vices.

While the cut — and the time Con­gress has left to stop it — seems omin­ous, the like­li­hood of it hap­pen­ing is small. It’s a dance Con­gress does each year after CMS an­nounces the cut, which a 1997 law re­quired in or­der to keep fed­er­al spend­ing in check with fed­er­al in­come.

Since 1992, the gov­ern­ment has is­sued pay­ments to phys­i­cians to cov­er the cost of care for Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies. In 1997, CMS ad­op­ted the Sus­tain­able Growth Rate for­mula, which helps lim­it fed­er­al spend­ing on Medi­care. It en­sures the yearly in­crease in ex­pendit­ures does not ex­ceed GDP growth. As a res­ult, phys­i­cians who re­ceive re­im­burse­ments for ser­vices to Medi­care pa­tients have been sub­ject to an­nu­al cuts, but each year Con­gress comes up with a “doc-fix” to raise pay­ments, push­ing the cuts back to be dealt with in fu­ture budget cycles. Con­gress has passed 15 “doc-fixes” since 2003, adding up to a grand total of $150 bil­lion.

This year, a per­man­ent re­peal-and-re­place solu­tion gained trac­tion on the Hill be­cause the Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice es­tim­ated that it would cost $175.5 bil­lion over 10 years, sig­ni­fic­antly lower than in pre­vi­ous years.

It is un­clear wheth­er delay­ing the per­man­ent “doc-fix” un­til 2014 would af­fect that cost es­tim­ate.

Lead­ing med­ic­al as­so­ci­ations, however, say the cost is worth it giv­en the long-term sav­ings.

“If we elim­in­ate the fisc­ally fool­ish SGR once and for all, it would cost less than all 15 of the pre­vi­ous patches that Con­gress has put in place over the last dec­ade,” said Ar­d­is Dee Hov­en, pres­id­ent of the Amer­ic­an Med­ic­al As­so­ci­ation, in a press re­lease. “At stake are in­nov­a­tions that would make Medi­care more cost ef­fect­ive for cur­rent and fu­ture gen­er­a­tions of seni­ors. In­nov­a­tion re­quires sta­bil­ity and in­vest­ment: in­vest­ment in health in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy to help share in­form­a­tion at the point of care, in­vest­ment in staff to help co­ordin­ate care, and in­vest­ment in time for phys­i­cians to con­sult with each oth­er about a pa­tient’s care.”

Hov­en said they are op­tim­ist­ic that they’ll get SGR re­peal this year, es­pe­cially giv­en the fact that le­gis­lat­ors star­ted work­ing on it early, as op­posed to oth­er years when it was handled as a last-minute fix in the budget. But be­cause Con­gress is fa­cing a tight budget, it will have to look for how to off­set the cost.

Hov­en ad­ded that ac­cess to care could be­come “a real threat” if Medi­care pay­ment re­mains un­stable and Con­gress doesn’t get a per­man­ent solu­tion done soon.

“One out of four Medi­care pa­tients is hav­ing dif­fi­culty find­ing a primary care phys­i­cian in this coun­try,” she said. “If in fact they fail to re­peal [SGR], the sta­bil­iz­a­tion of the Medi­care pro­gram is at great risk.”

Mem­bers of the Sen­ate Fin­ance Com­mit­tee are next ex­pec­ted to dis­cuss the SGR over­haul Dec. 12. The le­gis­la­tion — sponsored by Com­mit­tee Chair­man Max Baucus, D-Mont. — will be re­leased two days pri­or. The House Ways and Means Com­mit­tee Chair­man Dave Camp an­nounced Thursday that if “real pro­gress” con­tin­ues on the bill, he ex­pects the com­mit­tee to mark it up next week.

What We're Following See More »
Republican Polling Shows Close Race
Roundup: National Polling Remains Inconsistent
11 hours ago

The national polls, once again, tell very different stories: Clinton leads by just one point in the IBD, Rasmussen, and LA Times tracking polls, while she shows a commanding 12 point lead in the ABC news poll and a smaller but sizable five point lead in the CNN poll. The Republican Remington Research Group released a slew of polls showing Trump up in Ohio, Nevada, and North Carolina, a tie in Florida, and Clinton leads in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Virginia. However, an independent Siena poll shows Clinton up 7 in North Carolina, while a Monmouth poll shows Trump up one in Arizona

Colin Powell to Vote for Clinton
14 hours ago
Clinton Reaching Out to GOP Senators
19 hours ago

If you need a marker for how confident Hillary Clinton is at this point of the race, here's one: CNN's Jeff Zeleny reports "she's been talking to Republican senators, old allies and new, saying that she is willing to work with them and govern."

Trump Admits He’s Behind
19 hours ago
Ron Klain in Line to Be Clinton’s Chief of Staff?
19 hours ago

Sources tell CNN that longtime Democratic operative Ron Klain, who has been Vice President Biden's chief of staff, is "high on the list of prospects" to be chief of staff in a Clinton White House. "John Podesta, the campaign chairman, has signaled his interest in joining the Cabinet, perhaps as Energy secretary."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.