Outside Influences

Farmers’ Trade Fears Grow

Agriculture groups are increasingly worried that the Trump administration’s withdrawal from trade deals will hurt their exports.

AP Photo/Seth Perlman
Jerry Hagstrom
Add to Briefcase
Jerry Hagstrom
Feb. 28, 2017, 8 p.m.

DANA POINT, Cal­if.—Farm­ers, ranch­ers, and oth­er rur­al Amer­ic­ans may still be telling poll­sters that they ap­prove of Pres­id­ent Trump’s per­form­ance in of­fice. But ag­ri­cul­tur­al lead­ers and farm-state politi­cians are be­com­ing in­creas­ingly alarmed about Trump’s state­ments and plans that may af­fect ag­ri­cul­tur­al ex­ports to Mex­ico, China, Canada, and oth­er parts of the world.

Those con­cerns were evid­ent here this week when the In­ter­na­tion­al Dairy Foods As­so­ci­ation and the Sweeten­er Users As­so­ci­ation chose Darci Vet­ter, the U.S. chief ag­ri­cul­tur­al trade ne­go­ti­at­or in the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, as the key­note speak­er at their an­nu­al In­ter­na­tion­al Sweeten­er Col­loqui­um.

Vet­ter told the sug­ar traders and candy and dairy ex­ec­ut­ives here that Trump’s de­cision to with­draw from the Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship is a “loss for the glob­al trad­ing sys­tem” that has left most of ag­ri­cul­ture “out in the cold.” TPP, she noted, would not only have re­duced tar­iffs on a range of farm products in the 12 par­ti­cip­at­ing coun­tries, but would have set up rules on bi­o­tech­no­logy and the or­gan­ic sec­tor.

TPP also con­tained a pro­vi­sion to make state-owned en­ter­prises fol­low mar­ket rules in in­ter­na­tion­al busi­ness, and the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion hoped that China, which has many state en­ter­prises, would even­tu­ally join TPP and fol­low the rules.

“In some years [the Chinese are] our No. 1 mar­ket, but they are a very fickle mar­ket,” Vet­ter said.

What the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion will do re­gard­ing the North Amer­ic­an Free Trade Agree­ment with Mex­ico and Canada is still un­clear, she said, be­cause vari­ous ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials have said the United States is “go­ing to with­draw, rene­go­ti­ate it, mod­ern­ize it, tweak it a lot.”

Vet­ter said the 20-year-old NAF­TA agree­ment could use mod­ern­iz­a­tion but warned that there are many dangers for U.S. ag­ri­cul­ture, which has made massive sales of corn and oth­er products to Mex­ico in re­cent years. The Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion may wish to fo­cus on man­u­fac­tur­ing, she noted, but ques­tioned, “Could we con­tain that dis­cus­sion?” Dur­ing past trade dis­putes, Mex­ico and Canada have tar­geted U.S. farm products for re­tali­at­ory tar­iffs, she ad­ded.

Vet­ter told the in­dustry of­fi­cials that they must make their con­cerns known to the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion be­cause “frankly, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has broad lat­it­ude” to act on trade without con­gres­sion­al ac­tion. With­draw­ing from NAF­TA would re­quire fol­low­ing the rules in that agree­ment, but any ser­i­ous pro­pos­al would make in­dustry think twice about fu­ture busi­ness plans in­volving the cross-bor­der sup­ply chains that have be­come so im­port­ant in re­cent years, she said.

Rick Pasco, the pres­id­ent of the Sweeten­er Users, said that the group had joined 140 oth­er farm groups to send a let­ter to the White House about their con­cerns. But the is­sue of the mo­ment is that there are so few ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials in place and it is un­clear who is really go­ing to take the lead on trade ne­go­ti­ations.

Vet­ter’s speech here fol­lowed Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee Chair­man Pat Roberts’s state­ment in Man­hat­tan, Kan­sas, last week that de­creased trade “is the biggest danger to the farm in­dustry.

“Trade is on the minds of every farm­er, every ranch­er and, I as­sure you, it is on the mind of Sen­at­or Stabenow and my­self,” Roberts told a Kan­sas re­port­er, re­fer­ring to Sen. Debbie Stabenow, the com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber, who ac­com­pan­ied him home for the first farm-bill hear­ing.

Not­ing that Trump has said he wants to con­cen­trate on bi­lat­er­al agree­ments, Roberts said he had asked the White House to “an­nounce—with­in weeks, months if pos­sible—the coun­tries we are work­ing with” so that mem­bers of his com­mit­tee can be of help.

Roberts said that with so much un­cer­tainty about Mex­ico, it is “no secret” that Mex­ico may buy its ag­ri­cul­tur­al im­ports from coun­tries oth­er than the United States.

At the Re­new­able Fuels As­so­ci­ation meet­ing in San Diego last week, Na­tion­al Corn Grow­ers As­so­ci­ation CEO Chris Novak said, “The farm pro­gram will help with some oth­er is­sues, but the real prom­ise that our farm­ers see is growth in de­mand, and we know that growth in de­mand will come from [ex­ports].”

Novak ad­ded, “We know that Pres­id­ent Trump is com­mit­ted to im­prov­ing trade,” but he said his “frus­tra­tion” is that Trump is so op­posed to mul­ti­lat­er­al agree­ments that have been good for Amer­ic­an ag­ri­cul­ture.

All this con­cern is amp­li­fied by the White House’s slow­ness in send­ing the Sen­ate Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee the re­quired doc­u­ments on Sonny Per­due, the former Geor­gia gov­ernor who is Trump’s nom­in­ee for Ag­ri­cul­ture sec­ret­ary, so that a con­firm­a­tion hear­ing can be held.

Farm lead­ers be­lieve that Per­due could help Trump avoid mis­takes that could lead to trade wars.

Polls show two-thirds of rur­al Amer­ic­ans voted for Trump. Amer­ic­an Farm Bur­eau Fed­er­a­tion Pres­id­ent Zippy Duvall said last week at the Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment’s Out­look For­um, “I don’t know the man in the White House very well, but he ap­pears strong and cour­ageous.

“But I do know Sonny Per­due, and he is strong and cour­ageous, and I ask every­one to be strong and cour­ageous … to make every­one great again.”

What We're Following See More »
FACES STIFF OPPOSITION FROM BOTH PARTIES
Trump Proposes 95 Percent Cut To Office of Drug Control Budget
45 minutes ago
THE LATEST

Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.

Source:
HOPES A DEAL CAN GET DONE
Schumer Meeting with Trump for Last-Ditch Meeting
1 hours ago
THE LATEST
BLURRY LINE BETWEEN BUSINESS/PRESIDENCY
New CREW Report Identifies 500 Conflicts of Interest in Trump’s First Year
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

A new report assembled by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has identified more than 500 potential conflicts of interest in President Trump's first year. First, the report notes, Trump spent 122 days at his properties during his first year. He has been accompanied by 70 federal officials and 30 members of Congress. "Second, far from this signaled access to power being an empty promise, those who patronize President Trump’s businesses have, in fact, gained access to the president and his inner circle." Lastly, about 40 special interest groups and 11 foreign governments have held events at Trump properties.

Source:
BY SCALISE
House Told to “Stay Flexible”
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS
“NOT THE RIGHT TIME”
J.D. Vance Bows Out of Senate Run
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login