Republican Study Committee Chairman Steve Scalise has fired the group’s longtime executive director, Paul Teller, multiple sources told National Journal.
The reason for the dismissal, according to sources familiar with the situation, is that Teller allegedly shared sensitive conversations between RSC members with outside advocacy groups, some of whom hold policy positions counter to the RSC.
“No staffer is above a member,” said one senior Republican aide familiar with the situation. “Paul was divulging private, member-level conversations and actively working against RSC strategies supported by House conservatives.”
Teller could not immediately be reached for comment.
The move comes as Scalise, who has not stated whether he will support the budget compromised brokered by Rep. Paul Ryan, is attempting to take the temperature of his members on the agreement.
Scalise was meeting individually with top conservative lawmakers, including former RSC Chairman Jim Jordan, before Wednesday’s RSC gathering. Jordan, who is close to Teller, initially said the meeting was about Ryan’s budget agreement. But it became clear afterward that other things, including Teller’s dismissal, were discussed.
“Paul’s a good man, and he’s been helpful to the conservative movement,” Jordan said. “But the chairman is the chairman. And I support the chairman’s decision.”
On his way into the RSC meeting, Scalise emphasized that he remained undecided on Ryan’s deal. “We’re going to talk about that in here,” he said.
Teller, a staunch conservative with long-standing ties to outside groups opposing the deal, is accused of working behind the scenes to derail the budget agreement.
It’s not the first time he’s played both sides, according to several Republicans. In fact, they say Teller’s firing was a long time coming.
“This wasn’t ideological. He leaked against RSC members all the time,” said another senior GOP aide. “He worked against bills sponsored by members without the chairman knowing.”
At the same time, the leaders of some conservative outside groups rushed to Teller’s defense after news broke of his firing. “Paul Teller is an American hero,” tweeted Andy Roth, vice president of government affairs at the Club for Growth.
The dismissal was announced to members at Wednesday’s closed-door meeting. Shortly after the caucus gathered around lunchtime, dozens of staffers were asked to leave the room, an unusual move that typically signals Scalise’s desire to discuss a sensitive matter with RSC members only.
Scalise informed members at the meeting that he had asked for Teller’s resignation, and that Teller accepted. But the chairman did not elaborate on why the decision was made. “If you want to discuss the details, call my office,” Scalise said, according to members present.
The decision was apparently made unilaterally by Scalise. Rep. Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, a member of the RSC steering committee, said she was surprised by the news of Teller’s firing. “I didn’t find out about it until I walked in the room,” she said.
Other RSC members were caught off guard as well. Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kansas, did not attend the meeting but was “very disappointed” at the news.
“Paul’s one of the most effective staffers on the Hill,” Huelskamp said. “He helps our cause. And firing him does not.”
Teller joined the RSC in 2001 as legislative director and quickly assumed the role of executive director, a position he’s held for more than 10 years. He has been in the crosshairs before. When Scalise won an upset victory to become RSC chairman before the 113th Congress, House leadership officials urged him to dismiss Teller. But RSC members, many of them having known Teller for years, successfully lobbied for him to stay on.
Teller’s reputation is rooted in his grassroots approach to politics, which sometimes prizes conflict over compromise. Under his direction, the RSC has witnessed several intense ideological battles—both internal and external—that have cemented his status on Capitol Hill as a conservative agitator. When asked about his group’s hardball tactics earlier this year, Teller told National Journal: “We’re not there to smile and nod.”
There is no immediate word on who will replace Teller as executive director, a pivotal position that helps organize weekly meetings and policy papers for the caucus of more than 170 House Republicans.
What We're Following See More »
"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."
Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."
NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.
"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."
In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shunning traditional debate preparations, but has been watching video of…Clinton’s best and worst debate moments, looking for her vulnerabilities.” Trump “has paid only cursory attention to briefing materials. He has refused to use lecterns in mock debate sessions despite the urging of his advisers. He prefers spitballing ideas with his team rather than honing them into crisp, two-minute answers.”