RSC Fires Executive Director for Leaking ‘Member-Level’ Talks to Outside Groups

WASHINGTON - DECEMBER 11: Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) (C) introduces H.R. 4262, the 'CAP the DEBT Act,' during a news conference with fellow House Republicans (L-R) Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-TX), Rep. John Fleming (R-LA), Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) at the U.S. Capitol December 11, 2009 in Washington, DC. The bill looks to repeal the Gephardt Rule and thereby require a two-thirds majority in the House of Representatives and the Senate to authorize any increase in the U.S. national debt ceiling. Scalise and others threatened to vote against a war funding bill next week if it included a provision to raise the debt ceiling. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Add to Briefcase
Tim Alberta
Dec. 11, 2013, 12:37 p.m.

Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee Chair­man Steve Scal­ise has fired the group’s long­time ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or, Paul Tell­er, mul­tiple sources told Na­tion­al Journ­al.

The reas­on for the dis­missal, ac­cord­ing to sources fa­mil­i­ar with the situ­ation, is that Tell­er al­legedly shared sens­it­ive con­ver­sa­tions between RSC mem­bers with out­side ad­vocacy groups, some of whom hold policy po­s­i­tions counter to the RSC.

“No staffer is above a mem­ber,” said one seni­or Re­pub­lic­an aide fa­mil­i­ar with the situ­ation. “Paul was di­vul­ging private, mem­ber-level con­ver­sa­tions and act­ively work­ing against RSC strategies sup­por­ted by House con­ser­vat­ives.”

Tell­er could not im­me­di­ately be reached for com­ment.

The move comes as Scal­ise, who has not stated wheth­er he will sup­port the budget com­prom­ised brokered by Rep. Paul Ry­an, is at­tempt­ing to take the tem­per­at­ure of his mem­bers on the agree­ment.

Scal­ise was meet­ing in­di­vidu­ally with top con­ser­vat­ive law­makers, in­clud­ing former RSC Chair­man Jim Jordan, be­fore Wed­nes­day’s RSC gath­er­ing. Jordan, who is close to Tell­er, ini­tially said the meet­ing was about Ry­an’s budget agree­ment. But it be­came clear af­ter­ward that oth­er things, in­clud­ing Tell­er’s dis­missal, were dis­cussed.

“Paul’s a good man, and he’s been help­ful to the con­ser­vat­ive move­ment,” Jordan said. “But the chair­man is the chair­man. And I sup­port the chair­man’s de­cision.”

On his way in­to the RSC meet­ing, Scal­ise em­phas­ized that he re­mained un­de­cided on Ry­an’s deal. “We’re go­ing to talk about that in here,” he said.

Tell­er, a staunch con­ser­vat­ive with long-stand­ing ties to out­side groups op­pos­ing the deal, is ac­cused of work­ing be­hind the scenes to de­rail the budget agree­ment.

It’s not the first time he’s played both sides, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al Re­pub­lic­ans. In fact, they say Tell­er’s fir­ing was a long time com­ing.

“This wasn’t ideo­lo­gic­al. He leaked against RSC mem­bers all the time,” said an­oth­er seni­or GOP aide. “He worked against bills sponsored by mem­bers without the chair­man know­ing.”

At the same time, the lead­ers of some con­ser­vat­ive out­side groups rushed to Tell­er’s de­fense after news broke of his fir­ing. “Paul Tell­er is an Amer­ic­an hero,” tweeted Andy Roth, vice pres­id­ent of gov­ern­ment af­fairs at the Club for Growth.

The dis­missal was an­nounced to mem­bers at Wed­nes­day’s closed-door meet­ing. Shortly after the caucus gathered around lunch­time, dozens of staffers were asked to leave the room, an un­usu­al move that typ­ic­ally sig­nals Scal­ise’s de­sire to dis­cuss a sens­it­ive mat­ter with RSC mem­bers only.

Scal­ise in­formed mem­bers at the meet­ing that he had asked for Tell­er’s resig­na­tion, and that Tell­er ac­cep­ted. But the chair­man did not elab­or­ate on why the de­cision was made. “If you want to dis­cuss the de­tails, call my of­fice,” Scal­ise said, ac­cord­ing to mem­bers present.

The de­cision was ap­par­ently made uni­lat­er­ally by Scal­ise. Rep. Cyn­thia Lum­mis of Wyom­ing, a mem­ber of the RSC steer­ing com­mit­tee, said she was sur­prised by the news of Tell­er’s fir­ing. “I didn’t find out about it un­til I walked in the room,” she said.

Oth­er RSC mem­bers were caught off guard as well. Rep. Tim Huel­skamp, R-Kan­sas, did not at­tend the meet­ing but was “very dis­ap­poin­ted” at the news.

“Paul’s one of the most ef­fect­ive staffers on the Hill,” Huel­skamp said. “He helps our cause. And fir­ing him does not.”

Tell­er joined the RSC in 2001 as le­gis­lat­ive dir­ect­or and quickly as­sumed the role of ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or, a po­s­i­tion he’s held for more than 10 years. He has been in the crosshairs be­fore. When Scal­ise won an up­set vic­tory to be­come RSC chair­man be­fore the 113th Con­gress, House lead­er­ship of­fi­cials urged him to dis­miss Tell­er. But RSC mem­bers, many of them hav­ing known Tell­er for years, suc­cess­fully lob­bied for him to stay on.

Tell­er’s repu­ta­tion is rooted in his grass­roots ap­proach to polit­ics, which some­times prizes con­flict over com­prom­ise. Un­der his dir­ec­tion, the RSC has wit­nessed sev­er­al in­tense ideo­lo­gic­al battles—both in­tern­al and ex­tern­al—that have ce­men­ted his status on Cap­it­ol Hill as a con­ser­vat­ive agit­at­or. When asked about his group’s hard­ball tac­tics earli­er this year, Tell­er told Na­tion­al Journ­al: “We’re not there to smile and nod.”

There is no im­me­di­ate word on who will re­place Tell­er as ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or, a pivotal po­s­i­tion that helps or­gan­ize weekly meet­ings and policy pa­pers for the caucus of more than 170 House Re­pub­lic­ans.

What We're Following See More »
ON SANCTUARY CITIES
White House Attacks Judge Who Suspended Executive Order
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.

MAY BRING CONSERVATIVES ON BOARD, BUT WHAT ABOUT MODERATES?
House GOP Circulates Amendment on Preexisting Conditions
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."

AT LEAST 30 TO BE ASSESSED
Trump to Order Review of National Monuments
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.

Source:
EMERGING BUDGET FRAMEWORK?
Dems Proposes Obamacare-for-Defense Deal
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."

Source:
WHITE HOUSE BLOCKING DOC REQUEST
Michael Flynn Remains A Russian-Sized Problem
19 hours ago
BREAKING

The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login