Requiring newly employed federal employees to pay more into their pension funds and charging airline travelers a higher security fee are the two most talked-about moves to offset spending in the budget deal pending before Congress.
But a crazy quilt of other ideas, from the quirky to the speculative, also are part of the plan — such as cracking down on prisoners who somehow receive unemployment checks and making dead-certain that dead people don’t get tax refunds.
Unimpressed, some conservative and taxpayer groups on Wednesday likened these proposals to smoke and mirrors, labeling them weak promises of future savings made in return for more spending today.
The crafters of the budget deal, Republican Rep. Paul Ryan and Democratic Sen. Patty Murray, insist the projected savings are real. “All in all, we provide $63 billion over two fiscal years in sequester relief, which is replaced with $85 billion in mandatory savings, for a net deficit reduction of $23 billion,” Ryan said during a House Rules Committee hearing Wednesday.
“We stop paying Medicaid bills that deadbeat dads should be covering, we stop sending unemployment checks to criminals,” Ryan said, ticking off some of the proposals to realize savings by lowering spending, curbing fraud and waste, or increasing fees.
But closer scrutiny shows that a good chunk of the savings is to be spread out over 10 years. And some critics also say they have little faith lawmakers are capable of staying true to such commitments to spending caps a decade from now.
“It’s laughable,” says Tad DeHaven, an expert on federal and state budget issues for the Cato Institute. “It’s only been two years and they are going back on the sequester. It goes to show you how worthless long-term commitments are.”¦ Congress could change this deal by the time we’re off the phone,” he told a reporter Wednesday.
According to figures put out by Murray and Ryan’s offices, some of provisions pitched as bringing in savings to offset the added spending include:
- About $786 million over 10 years — including $517 million in increased revenues or penalties through a crackdown on fraudulently claimed tax refunds — by blocking misuse of the ominously named “Dead Master File.” The Commerce Department would impose greater restrictions on access to the list of dead people and their Social Security numbers;
- An estimated $242 million over 10 years by going after prisoners who illegally claim federal benefits, including $162 million tied to preventing improper tax refunds;
- About $1.4 billion over 10 years by reinforcing Medicaid’s standing as the payer of last resort, including allowing states to collect medical child support in cases where health insurance is available from a non-custodial parent;
- An estimated $7.9 billion over 10 years by raising the premiums companies pay the federal government to guarantee their pension benefits;
- An estimated $3.1 billion savings over 10 years by eliminating special carve-outs for nonprofit student-loan servicers;
- More than $1.5 billion over 10 years by permanently canceling the unobligated balances of the Justice Department’s Asset Forfeiture Fund and the Treasury Forfeiture Fund.
In addition, raising the Transportation Security Administration’s security fees on airline tickets is estimated to bring in another $12.6 billion in savings over 10 years.
Another $25 million in savings is projected as a result of approving an agreement with Mexico to jointly explore and develop offshore hydrocarbon resources; nearly $6 billion would be saved over 10 years by increasing federal employee pension contributions by 1.3 percentage points; and another $6 billion would be generated over 10 years by changing the annual cost-of-living adjustment for working-age military retirees.
But are all of these projected savings real?
“Efforts to curb waste, fraud, and abuse in entitlement programs are worth a lot of praise, but they’ve served as pay-fors in a number of [previous] budget plans,” said Pete Sepp, vice president of the National Taxpayers Union. “How will these be different, in that they’ll actually deliver on the promised savings?”
Sepp and others also say many of these proposals are actions Congress and federal agencies should have taken already.
“We’ve known about unobligated balances in various federal accounts for several years now…. Why wait until yesterday to announce that something was being done about it, at least for a few agencies?” Sepp asked on Wednesday.
Cato’s DeHaven added: “One of the things is to crack down on fraud — people getting unemployment benefits while in prison. Well, why aren’t you doing that already?”
Ryan Alexander, president of Taxpayers for Common Sense, complained: “The deal’s authors are using a patchwork of questionable offsets and budgetary optical illusions instead of responsibly replacing possible across-the-board sequestration cuts with real deficit reduction. This is just a thinly veiled attempt to hide real spending increases that bust the budgetary caps both chambers and the president agreed to only two years ago.”
What We're Following See More »
In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.
As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."
"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.
In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”
As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."