Paul Ryan Takes a Step Toward House Speakership

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 19: U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, Chairman of the House Budget Committee, departs a House Republican caucus meeting at the U.S. Capitol on November 19, 2013 in Washington, DC. Boehner commented on the ongoing problems with the implementation of the Affordable Care Act during his remarks.
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Add to Briefcase
Tim Alberta
Dec. 12, 2013, 3:48 p.m.

Paul Ry­an’s pres­id­en­tial pro­spects may have dimmed this week, but his fu­ture on Cap­it­ol Hill has nev­er looked bright­er.

The budget com­prom­ise he struck with Sen. Patty Mur­ray, which passed the House on a lop­sided 332-94 vote Thursday, had con­ser­vat­ive act­iv­ists and out­side groups howl­ing. That might one day curb Re­pub­lic­an en­thu­si­asm for Paul Ry­an the pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate.

But in­side the dome, over­whelm­ing sup­port for Paul Ry­an the poli­cy­maker — even from those vot­ing against his pro­pos­al — armed him with a ma­jor le­gis­lat­ive vic­tory and a repu­ta­tion as a bi­par­tis­an con­sensus-build­er. That means big­ger things may be on the ho­ri­zon.

“Paul did as­ton­ish­ingly well. He was at a pro­found dis­ad­vant­age in those ne­go­ti­ations, and I think he did amaz­ingly well,” said Rep. Trent Franks, an Ari­zona Re­pub­lic­an who ul­ti­mately op­posed the agree­ment.

Ry­an was once be­lieved to pos­sess the sin­gu­lar abil­ity to sell a budget com­prom­ise to even the most skep­tic­al con­ser­vat­ives. Al­though he won over the vast ma­jor­ity of Re­pub­lic­ans, that the­ory proved false — 62 of Ry­an’s GOP com­rades voted against his pro­pos­al. But what he did pull off — los­ing the votes of those Re­pub­lic­ans, but not their re­spect and ad­mir­a­tion — is per­haps even more im­press­ive.

“I think he’s been well-re­spec­ted and he’s go­ing to stay well-re­spec­ted,” Rep. Jim Jordan, an Ohio Re­pub­lic­an, said of Ry­an be­fore the fi­nal vote on Fri­day.

Jordan op­posed the budget deal, which he said vi­ol­ates part of a Janu­ary agree­ment among Re­pub­lic­ans stat­ing that the House wouldn’t trade away se­quest­ra­tion for any­thing ex­cept en­ti­tle­ment re­forms. But Jordan says their dis­pute over this deal doesn’t change his opin­ion of Ry­an.

“I re­spec­ted the guy be­fore. I re­spect him now,” Jordan said. “I think he’s been a good lead­er in our con­fer­ence, and a great budget chair­man. I just dis­agree with his vote here.”

Rep. Mick Mul­vaney, an­oth­er Ry­an ally who op­posed the budget deal, em­phas­ized that Ry­an’s will­ing­ness to strike a com­prom­ise “does not un­der­mine his con­ser­vat­ive cred­ib­il­ity or bona fides.”

That sen­ti­ment rang uni­ver­sal this week among Ry­an’s con­ser­vat­ive com­rades who op­poses his budget agree­ment. They like him and ad­mire him as much as ever. They just wer­en’t go­ing to vote for his deal.

“People re­spect him. He had a job to do, and he went and did it,” said Rep. Justin Amash, a Michigan Re­pub­lic­an who voted against the meas­ure.

Such ad­u­la­tion, of course, is com­ing from Ry­an’s col­leagues in the halls of Con­gress. Con­ser­vat­ive opin­ion-lead­ers and ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tions out­side haven’t been nearly as gen­er­ous with their re­views of Ry­an’s work.

The Club for Growth, which pres­sured law­makers to vote against the deal, blas­ted it as “budget­ary smoke and mir­rors.” Talk-ra­dio host Mark Lev­in told Ry­an the agree­ment was “Mickey Mouse.” And Her­it­age Ac­tion, which also key-voted in op­pos­i­tion, called Ry­an’s work “a step back­ward” for con­ser­vat­ism.

Ry­an, for his part, seemed more be­mused than be­trayed by the con­ser­vat­ive cri­ti­cism. “It’s a strange new nor­mal, isn’t it?” he said Wed­nes­day. “It is what it is. It’s funny, isn’t it?”

Laugh­ing off dis­par­age­ment is a fa­vor­ite tac­tic of Speak­er John Boehner, who launched a rhet­or­ic­al of­fens­ive against the out­side groups this week, say­ing they had “lost all cred­ib­il­ity” after voicing op­pos­i­tion to a budget deal they hadn’t yet seen.

Ry­an once worked in Boehner’s of­fice as an in­tern, and the two have been close ever since. Ry­an’s mim­ick­ing of Boehner’s at­ti­tude this week, and Boehner’s pa­ternal-like de­fense of Ry­an’s plan, could fore­tell a scen­ario one day in which the speak­er’s gavel passes from one small-town Mid­west­ern­er to the oth­er. But that won’t likely hap­pen any­time soon; Boehner’s of­fice has said the speak­er will run for reelec­tion in the next Con­gress. And Ry­an, who is term-lim­ited as chair­man of the Budget Com­mit­tee, ap­pears likely to take over the Ways and Means pan­el in 2015.

Still, Ry­an’s name has long been whispered — some­times shouted — as a po­ten­tial suc­cessor to Boehner. That spec­u­la­tion could have ended ab­ruptly this week. But it didn’t. In fact, listen­ing to his col­leagues shower him with ad­or­a­tion in re­cent days, it wouldn’t be un­reas­on­able to think Ry­an’s budget com­prom­ise may be a ma­jor as­set.

“The only reas­on that I am, at this point, un­de­cided is out of my com­plete re­spect and re­gard for Paul Ry­an,” Rep. Cyn­thia Lum­mis, R-Wyo., said Wed­nes­day. “He has re­mained per­son­ally com­mit­ted to con­ser­vat­ive prin­ciples. He has re­mained per­son­ally com­mit­ted to bal­an­cing the budget in 10 years. I am proud to serve with him.”

Lum­mis, whom Ry­an ul­ti­mately couldn’t con­vince to sup­port the budget deal, non­ethe­less ad­ded, “He has been a mar­velous sol­dier.”

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
11 hours ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
17 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login