U.S. Nuclear-Arms Cost Estimate Jumps Up $27 Billion

Technicians perform maintenance on a W-76 nuclear warhead. An 18-year cost estimate for U.S. nuclear-arms operations has jumped up more than $27 billion, the congressional Government Accountability Office said.
National Journal
Diane Barnes
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Diane Barnes
Dec. 13, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

An 18-year spend­ing out­look for U.S. nuc­le­ar arms has shot up by $27.1 bil­lion, and costs could rise fur­ther still, con­gres­sion­al aud­it­ors said this week.

In­vest­ig­at­ors found the in­crease by com­par­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s latest cost es­tim­ate for main­tain­ing and up­dat­ing U.S. nuc­le­ar weapons over a set peri­od — fisc­al years 2014 through 2031 — to the U.S. es­tim­ate from two years ago for the same time­frame, ac­cord­ing to a Gov­ern­ment Ac­count­ab­il­ity Of­fice re­port re­leased Wed­nes­day.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion blamed the up­tick from in part on a change in its cal­cu­la­tion meth­od. The agency — a semi­autonom­ous arm of the En­ergy De­part­ment — noted that its pro­jec­tion from fisc­al 2012 re­lied on out-of-date data based on the now-de­funct Re­li­able Re­place­ment War­head pro­gram, aud­it­ors wrote in the as­sess­ment.

GAO aud­it­ors said a sched­ule ad­just­ment also con­trib­uted to the cost jump, which boos­ted an­ti­cip­ated stock­pile ex­pendit­ures for the 18-year peri­od from $46 bil­lion to $73.1 bil­lion. The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion moved up plans to be­gin mod­ern­iz­ing nuc­le­ar war­heads for the Air Launched Cruise Mis­sile sev­en years soon­er — in 2024 in­stead of 2031 — bring­ing more of the as­so­ci­ated costs in­to the time range un­der scru­tiny.

The es­tim­ate for over­all NNSA spend­ing dur­ing the same peri­od in­creased by just $19 bil­lion, ac­cord­ing to GAO aud­it­ors. They vari­ation, they wrote, is due to de­creases in the agency’s pro­jec­ted spend­ing on oth­er agency activ­it­ies, such as main­ten­ance of the nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al’s sup­port­ing in­fra­struc­ture.

They noted, though, that the agency’s es­tim­ate leaves out “most of the budget es­tim­ates” for two pricey ini­ti­at­ives: con­struct­ing a new en­riched-urani­um pro­cessing plant in Ten­ness­ee, and sus­tain­ing plutoni­um cap­ab­il­it­ies long tied to a pro­posed fa­cil­ity that now faces can­cel­la­tion.

“NNSA plans to con­struct these fa­cil­it­ies or al­tern­at­ives to the fa­cil­it­ies and, as a res­ult, NNSA’s budget es­tim­ates for the in­fra­struc­ture area are not fully aligned with its mod­ern­iz­a­tion plans and likely un­der­es­tim­ate the amount of fund­ing that will be needed in fu­ture years.

The re­port notes sev­er­al factors that could fur­ther shift NNSA cost es­tim­ates in com­ing years, in­clud­ing the agency’s fail­ure to ac­count in its pro­jec­tions to date for budget cuts man­dated un­der the 2011 Budget Con­trol Act. Those “se­quest­ra­tion” re­duc­tions would crimp nuc­le­ar-weapons spend­ing if they re­main in place, the doc­u­ment says.

Its au­thors noted two oth­er vari­ables that could in­crease spend­ing: a pos­sible rise in ex­penses from con­tract­or re­tire­ment funds, and “cost sav­ings” built in­to budget es­tim­ates without full as­sess­ments of how to achieve them.

This art­icle was pub­lished in Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire, which is pro­duced in­de­pend­ently by Na­tion­al Journ­al Group un­der con­tract with the Nuc­le­ar Threat Ini­ti­at­ive. NTI is a non­profit, non­par­tis­an group work­ing to re­duce glob­al threats from nuc­le­ar, bio­lo­gic­al, and chem­ic­al weapons.

What We're Following See More »
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
HAS BEEN OFF OF NEWSCASTS FOR A WEEK
For First Debate, Holt Called on NBC Experts for Prep
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

NBC's Lester Holt hasn't hosted the "Nightly News" since Tuesday, as he's prepped for moderating the first presidential debate tonight—and the first of his career. He's called on a host of NBC talent to help him, namely NBC News and MSNBC chairman Andy Lack; NBC News president Deborah Turness; the news division's senior vice president of editorial, Janelle Rodriguez; "Nightly News" producer Sam Singal, "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd, senior political editor Mark Murray and political editor Carrie Dann. But during the debate itself, the only person in Holt's earpiece will be longtime debate producer Marty Slutsky.

Source:
WHITE HOUSE PROMISES VETO
House Votes to Bar Cash Payments to Iran
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed legislation late Thursday that would prohibit the federal government from making any cash payments to Iran, in protest of President Obama's recently discovered decision to pay Iran $1.7 billion in cash in January. And while the White House has said Obama would veto the bill, 16 Democrats joined with Republicans to pass the measure, 254-163."

Source:
NO SURPRISE
Trump Eschewing Briefing Materials in Debate Prep
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In contrast to Hillary Clinton's meticulous debate practice sessions, Donald Trump "is largely shun­ning tra­di­tion­al de­bate pre­par­a­tions, but has been watch­ing video of…Clin­ton’s best and worst de­bate mo­ments, look­ing for her vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies.” Trump “has paid only curs­ory at­ten­tion to brief­ing ma­ter­i­als. He has re­fused to use lecterns in mock de­bate ses­sions des­pite the ur­ging of his ad­visers. He prefers spit­balling ideas with his team rather than hon­ing them in­to crisp, two-minute an­swers.”

Source:
×