‘Immigration Problems Only Get Worse’

An Intel immigration executive challenges Congress in 2014: “Address these problems now or maintain a broken system that fails to meet the needs of anyone.”

Peter Muller is director of immigration policy for Intel.
National Journal
Peter Muller
Dec. 18, 2013, 12:05 a.m.

As the first ses­sion of the 113th Con­gress winds to a close, it is clear the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives will not vote on im­mig­ra­tion le­gis­la­tion be­fore 2014. But the prac­tic­al need to fix our broken im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem re­mains, the polit­ic­al im­per­at­ive for re­form is stronger than ever, and a win­dow of op­por­tun­ity ex­ists for Con­gress to fi­nal­ize a re­form pack­age next year.

One year ago the res­ults of the 2012 elec­tion promp­ted lead­ers in both ma­jor polit­ic­al parties to take a fresh look at im­mig­ra­tion re­form.

Pres­id­ent Obama and the Demo­crats dis­covered a re­newed com­mit­ment to the is­sue in part be­cause His­pan­ic and Asi­an-Amer­ic­an voters made up a sig­ni­fic­ant por­tion of the Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ate, and im­mig­ra­tion re­form was high on their agenda. At the same time, Re­pub­lic­ans at­trib­uted Mitt Rom­ney’s loss in part to his fail­ure to at­tract minor­ity voters and viewed im­mig­ra­tion re­form as an op­por­tun­ity to build sup­port with that con­stitu­ency.

Elect­or­al res­ults in 2013 have pro­duced sim­il­ar evid­ence that im­mig­ra­tion re­form can be a po­tent factor in elec­tions.  Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Chris Christie, an im­mig­ra­tion re­form back­er, was over­whelm­ingly reelec­ted in New Jer­sey and car­ried nearly half the His­pan­ic vote in his state. But Re­pub­lic­an At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Cuc­cinelli, who was viewed as an op­pon­ent of im­mig­ra­tion re­form, lost his race for gov­ernor of Vir­gin­ia in part be­cause he failed to at­tract a sig­ni­fic­ant per­cent­age of the Latino vote.

Mean­while, a poll jointly re­leased this fall by the Part­ner­ship for a New Amer­ic­an Eco­nomy, Re­pub­lic­ans for Im­mig­ra­tion Re­form, and Com­pete Amer­ica shows that 71 per­cent of the Amer­ic­an people fa­vor im­mig­ra­tion re­form, and 54 per­cent say they are less likely to sup­port a can­did­ate who op­poses re­form.

While we have seen sig­ni­fic­ant pro­gress this year to­ward im­mig­ra­tion re­form, in­clud­ing pas­sage of a com­pre­hens­ive bill in the Sen­ate, it has yet to get across the fin­ish line.

And while we wait for re­form our im­mig­ra­tion prob­lems only get worse.

The last ma­jor over­haul of U.S. im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem oc­curred in 1986, and the laws en­acted then have failed to pass the test of time. The num­ber of people liv­ing here without doc­u­ment­a­tion has grown, em­ploy­ers have struggled to find the work­force ne­ces­sary to per­form both lower- and high­er-skilled jobs, and the Amer­ic­an people lack con­fid­ence that our bor­ders are se­cure.

Mean­while, in the high-skilled arena, our abil­ity to com­pete in the glob­al mar­ket­place is com­prom­ised. The in­form­a­tion-tech­no­logy in­dustry struggles to find enough qual­i­fied U.S. work­ers to fill the key jobs ne­ces­sary for con­tin­ued in­nov­a­tion. Em­ploy­ees who ob­tain tem­por­ary visas must wait years be­fore they can get a green card to al­low them to live and work here per­man­ently. Em­ploy­ers are already pre­par­ing for an ex­pec­ted H-1B visa lot­tery in April that will dis­trib­ute too few visas to meet de­mand.

The chal­lenge for Con­gress is clear: Ad­dress these prob­lems now or main­tain a broken sys­tem that fails to meet the needs of any­one.

In June, the Sen­ate passed le­gis­la­tion that would make hol­ist­ic re­forms to the im­mig­ra­tion sys­temfrom leg­al visas to il­leg­al entry to en­hanced bor­der se­cur­ity meas­ures — with the votes of two-thirds of the sen­at­ors.

In­tel and oth­er em­ploy­ers of high-skilled work­ers strongly sup­por­ted the le­gis­la­tion be­cause it ad­dressed our three key needs: to hire for­eign-born work­ers when we can’t find qual­i­fied U.S. work­ers; ac­cess to ad­di­tion­al visas to make those tal­en­ted em­ploy­ees long-term mem­bers of our com­pany and our coun­try; and to build the pipeline of U.S. work­ers with spe­cial­ized skills through ad­di­tion­al fund­ing for STEM edu­ca­tion.

The strong sup­port for the bill in the Sen­ate was en­cour­aging, but it didn’t mask le­git­im­ate con­cerns many people, par­tic­u­larly in the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives, have about parts of the le­gis­la­tion. The House pledged to pur­sue a dif­fer­ent path to­ward re­form and con­sider a series of piece­meal bills ad­dress­ing dis­creet prob­lems with the sys­tem. Five in­di­vidu­al bills have been re­por­ted out of com­mit­tees in the House, but none has yet to reach the House floor.

But that doesn’t mean im­mig­ra­tion re­form is dead. House Speak­er John Boehner re­cently hired a seni­or staffer to co­ordin­ate im­mig­ra­tion policy. Rank-and-file Re­pub­lic­an House mem­bers are in­creas­ingly ex­press­ing their view that they are ready to tackle im­mig­ra­tion re­form. And the pres­id­ent has ex­pressed a will­ing­ness to work with Re­pub­lic­ans on a piece­meal ap­proach to re­form. Even the re­cent budget agree­ment points to the pos­sib­il­ity of bi­par­tis­an ef­forts mov­ing for­ward.

The polit­ics of im­mig­ra­tion re­form are al­ways chal­len­ging, and rarely are people from dif­fer­ent sides of the is­sue ready to come to­geth­er to ad­dress the prob­lem. This is one of those times. However, for the hope of im­mig­ra­tion re­form to be achieved, the House of Rep­res­ent­at­ives must be ready to act when mem­bers re­turn from their hol­i­day break.

MOST READ
What We're Following See More »
BUT HE’S NOT ADVOCATING FOR IT
Grassley Open to Lame Duck Hearings on Garland
14 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said Monday he'd now be willing to hold a hearing on Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in a lame-duck session of Congress. While he said he wouldn't push for it, he said if "Hillary Clinton wins the White House, and a majority of senators convinced him to do so," he would soften his previous opposition.

Source:
DOWN FROM POST-CONVENTION NUMBERS
Monmouth Has Clinton Up Seven
18 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a new Monmouth University poll, 46% of likely voters support Clinton and 39% back Trump, with 7% supporting Libertarian Gary Johnson, and 2% backing Jill Stein of the Green Party. That's down from a poll taken right after the Democratic convention, in which Clinton led by 13 points.

Source:
DEBATE PREP
Clinton Advisers Talking to Psychologists, Trump Ghostwriter
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

“Hillary Clinton’s advisers are talking to Donald J. Trump’s ghostwriter of The Art of the Deal, seeking insights about Mr. Trump’s deepest insecurities as they devise strategies to needle and undermine him in four weeks at the first presidential debate, the most anticipated in a generation. ... Her team is also getting advice from psychology experts to help create a personality profile of Mr. Trump to gauge how he may respond to attacks and deal with a woman as his sole adversary on the debate stage.”

EPI-PEN PRICES
House Committee Investigating Mylan
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has requested documents from the CEO of Mylan, "the pharmaceutical company under fire after raising the price of EpiPens more than 400 percent since 2007." Meanwhile, top members of the Energy and Commerce Committee are pressing the FDA on the lack of generic competition for EpiPens.

Source:
×