Wolf’s Retirement Opens Another Battleground District for Democrats

Democrats are on defense nationally, but they do have a trio of opportunities in long-held GOP districts.

GLEN ALLEN, VA - AUGUST 17: U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) speaks during a campaign rally of Republican U.S. Vice Presidential candidate Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) at West Springfield High School August 17, 2012 in Springfield, Virginia. Rep. Ryan continued to campaign for the upcoming general elections.
National Journal
Scott Bland
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Scott Bland
Dec. 17, 2013, 9:44 a.m.

The polit­ic­al trends clos­ing out 2013 have not been kind to Demo­crats, and their chances of re­tak­ing the House next year are slim. But the year ends with a table of op­por­tun­it­ies set in the lower cham­ber, most re­cently Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Frank Wolf’s an­nounce­ment Tues­day that he won’t seek reelec­tion in Vir­gin­ia. Wolf’s re­tire­ment leaves a third battle­ground, sub­urb­an, Re­pub­lic­an-held con­gres­sion­al dis­trict wide open in 2014, giv­ing Demo­crats the chance to make a strong run at a trio of seats that oth­er­wise would have been far out of reach.

Demo­crats have plenty of vul­ner­able House seats to de­fend in 2014, but all of them thus far are set to have in­cum­bents de­fend­ing them, save for the bright-red Utah dis­trict held by Rep. Jim Math­eson, who also an­nounced his re­tire­ment Tues­day. Mean­while, two-term Rep. Jon Run­yan, R-N.J., de­cided not to run for reelec­tion last month, and Rep. Bill Young died in Oc­to­ber, trig­ger­ing a spe­cial elec­tion in Flor­ida’s Pinel­las County.

All three dis­tricts are an­ces­tral Re­pub­lic­an ter­rit­ory but now split nearly 50-50 in na­tion­al polit­ics. Wolf’s seat, like Young’s, changed dra­mat­ic­ally dur­ing his time in of­fice — from a re­li­ably Re­pub­lic­an area to more evenly split ter­rit­ory over the course of 33 years. In this year’s Vir­gin­ia gov­ernor’s race, Re­pub­lic­an At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Ken Cuc­cinelli car­ried Wolf’s dis­trict in Wash­ing­ton’s sub­urbs by 1 per­cent­age point over Demo­crat Terry McAul­iffe, ac­cord­ing to Bloomberg. That’s the same mar­gin with which Mitt Rom­ney won the dis­trict in the 2012 pres­id­en­tial elec­tion, while Pres­id­ent Obama won a 51 per­cent to 48 per­cent vic­tory there in 2008.

Obama’s 1-point loss in Vir­gin­ia’s 10th Dis­trict was ac­tu­ally the worst Demo­crats did in any of the three now open seats. Obama car­ried Young’s Flor­ida dis­trict by 1 point and Run­yan’s New Jer­sey seat by 4 points in 2012. Obama’s vic­tory in 2008 helped sweep a Demo­crat, John Adler, in­to the New Jer­sey seat for the first time in dec­ades.

But all three Re­pub­lic­ans, es­pe­cially the vet­er­an ap­pro­pri­at­ors Wolf and Young, com­pletely res­isted the polit­ic­al cur­rents in their dis­tricts in 2012, thanks to built-up years of mod­er­ate repu­ta­tions and force of per­son­al­ity. Run­yan’s 9-point vic­tory was the smal­lest of the trio in 2012.

That made Run­yan and Young par­tic­u­larly rare com­mod­it­ies in this Con­gress, as two of just 17 House Re­pub­lic­ans from dis­tricts that Obama car­ried in last year’s elec­tion. Wolf’s dis­trict falls just out­side that cat­egory; Rom­ney’s mar­gin was barely more than 4,000 votes. Whomever Re­pub­lic­ans nom­in­ate to run in those three open seats, they won’t have the ad­vant­age of time-tested fa­mili­ar­ity that Wolf and his col­leagues would have had in reelec­tion runs.

Mean­while, na­tion­al Demo­crats have can­did­ates ready to go in all three dis­tricts. Just last week, the Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee touted Fair­fax County Su­per­visor John Foust’s de­cision to run for Wolf’s seat, and the DCCC has already lined up be­hind wo­men run­ning for the oth­er two open seats: county of­fice­hold­er Aimee Bel­gard in New Jer­sey and Alex Sink, a former gubernat­ori­al nom­in­ee, in March’s Flor­ida spe­cial elec­tion.

House Demo­crats are guar­an­teed noth­ing in 2014, and the cur­rent polit­ic­al cli­mate fore­tells more pain than gain. Over the last two months, they have sur­rendered their lead in gen­er­ic-bal­lot polls. But Wolf’s re­tire­ment opens up a third op­por­tun­ity for Demo­crats to play of­fense in a dis­trict where there was no op­por­tun­ity be­fore.

What We're Following See More »
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

FUNERAL FOR ISRAELI LEADER
Obama Compares Peres to ‘Giants of the 20th Century’
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Speaking at the funeral of former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres, President Obama "compared Peres to 'other giants of the 20th century' such as Nelson Mandela and Queen Elizabeth who 'find no need to posture or traffic in what's popular in the moment.'" Among the 6,000 mourners at the service was Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. Obama called Abbas's presence a sign of the "unfinished business of peace" in the region.

Source:
THE QUESTION
How Many New Voters Does the Clinton Campaign Aim to Register?
2 hours ago
THE ANSWER

Three million—a number that lays "bare the significant gap between Donald Trump’s bare-bones operation and the field program that Clinton and her hundreds of aides have been building for some 17 months."

Source:
“STANDING FOR PRINCIPLES”
Chicago Tribune Endorses Johnson
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a somewhat shocking move, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson for president, saying a vote for him is one that voters "can be proud of." The editorial barely touches on Donald Trump, who the paper has time and again called "unfit to be president," before offering a variety of reasons for why it can't endorse Hillary Clinton. Johnson has been in the news this week for being unable to name a single world leader who he admires, after earlier this month being unable to identify "Aleppo," a major Syrian city in the middle of the country's ongoing war.

Source:
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
16 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×