Sprint is flirting with a bid to buy T-Mobile, but even if the wireless giant does pop the question, a wary Uncle Sam may stop the two from ever coming together.
News leaked last week that Sprint is considering a T-Mobile merger, and at first blush, it appears like a win for those looking to keep the wireless world competitive: With a stronger network, better scale, and larger customer base, a combined T-Mobile and Sprint would be equipped to better compete with Verizon and AT&T.
Maintaining fair competition is a priority for both the Justice Department and Federal Communications Commission, so there is “a decent argument that Sprint and T-Mobile together would be a stronger long-term counterweight to AT&T and Verizon,” said Paul Gallant, a managing director at Guggenheim Securities.
But considerable regulatory and technical obstacles stand in the way.
The magic number for a competitive wireless marketplace is four, not three, according to the FCC and DOJ. They are unlikely to approve such a merger for the same reason they prevented AT&T’s $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile in 2011: Less competition would lead to higher consumer prices.
Although Sprint is nowhere AT&T in market share, these concerns still remain strong.
“The mobile business today is today with four carriers a competitive business and [it’s] important to stay that way,” FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said in a Q&A following his first public remarks on Dec. 2.
Also, T-Mobile is experiencing an unexpected revival from its near-death in 2011. After four years of decline, the third-largest mobile carrier has had two quarters of growth, courtesy of an energetic CEO and a “blitz” of new offerings, including the iPhone 5 and LTE service. Regulators will want to see how this plays out.
“This really demonstrates that competition can work,” William J. Baer, DOJ’s chief antitrust lawyer, told The New York Times just last month. “When you have feisty rivals whose survival depends on innovating and differentiating, they can gain market share and loosen the oligopoly. That’s exactly what T-Mobile has done.”
Even if Sprint can successfully overcome the significant regulatory hurdles to acquire T-Mobile, it would face unruly and expensive technological challenges to combine the two networks.
Although the timing might not be right for a T-Mobile-Sprint marriage this time around, a union may be inevitable down the road. The industry has been consolidating over the past couple of years, so a merger may be in their future if either Sprint or T-Mobile begins to lose momentum.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."