Crude Debate: Should U.S. Lift Export Ban?

BELLE CHASSE, LA - JUNE 4: An oil tanker is seen docked at the ConocoPhillips Alliance Refinery June 4, 2008 in Belle Chasse, Louisiana. The refinery, located in Plaquemines Parish, processes 247,000 barrels of crude oil per day. Oil production suffered significant damage in the state by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita but high oil prices have driven the value of Louisiana's petroleum and coal exports up 127 percent. Petroleum and coal exports totaled $2.5 billion during the first quarter of 2008 compared to $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2007. (Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
National Journal
Amy Harder and Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Amy Harder Clare Foran
Dec. 17, 2013, 2:40 p.m.

As Con­gress gears up to tackle the pro­spect of lift­ing the dec­ades-old ban on crude-oil ex­ports, early re­ac­tions from law­makers in­dic­ate that it will be a polit­ic­ally di­vis­ive is­sue.

“I don’t know if the polit­ics are ne­ces­sar­ily right to lift [the ban],” Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources rank­ing mem­ber Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said Tues­day. “I do know they’re ripe for a very thor­ough dis­cus­sion about what’s go­ing to go on. It’s ex­cit­ing.”

Two oil-state Demo­crats con­sidered vul­ner­able in their reelec­tion bids next year said they would sup­port crude-oil ex­ports, which have been banned since the 1973 oil em­bargo, even as U.S. ex­ports of pro­cessed pet­ro­leum products have been boom­ing.

“I would sup­port lift­ing the ban if the sci­entif­ic data shows that we should,” Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., told Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily on Tues­day. “And I think that’s what the data is show­ing.”

Sen. Mark Be­gich, D-Alaska, sim­il­arly said he would sup­port ex­pan­ded crude-oil ex­ports, though he said he con­siders eas­ing re­stric­tions on ship­ments of nat­ur­al gas abroad a high­er pri­or­ity.

“There’s crude and then gas. Gas is the big one,” he said. He noted that Alaska already ex­ports nat­ur­al gas and has ex­por­ted oil in the past. (Con­gress ap­proved ex­port­ing crude oil via the Trans-Alaska Pipeline in 1996, al­low­ing a small per­cent­age of Alaskan oil — about 2.7 per­cent — to be ex­por­ted over eight years to Pu­erto Rico, the Vir­gin Is­lands, and else­where. But no crude oil has been ex­por­ted since 2004, ac­cord­ing to the En­ergy In­form­a­tion Ad­min­is­tra­tion.)

Since oil is priced on a glob­al mar­ket, Be­gich said it makes sense to ex­port it.

Murkowski is tak­ing a more cau­tious ap­proach than her Demo­crat­ic col­league from Alaska. She hasn’t taken an of­fi­cial po­s­i­tion on the pro­spect of lift­ing the crude-oil ex­port ban. She is giv­ing a ma­jor speech on the broad­er top­ic of en­ergy ex­ports on Jan. 7, which is likely to shed light on her po­s­i­tion on this top­ic.

“I’m go­ing to talk about the chan­ging dy­nam­ic with what we’re see­ing with oil pro­duc­tion across the coun­try,” Murkowski said.

Sen­ate En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Chair­man Ron Wyden, D-Ore., was less def­in­ite about wheth­er or not he wants to see the is­sue come to the fore. The com­mit­tee is plan­ning a hear­ing on the top­ic for the early part of the year.

“It’s very much clear that there is go­ing to be a de­bate on this is­sue,” he said. “I just want to make clear that if that de­bate goes for­ward my top pri­or­ity is pro­tect­ing the Amer­ic­an con­sumer. Amer­ic­an con­sumers have really got­ten clobbered in the past, so that will be my top pri­or­ity.”

A small hand­ful of lib­er­al Demo­crats are voicing con­cerns about what price-im­pact ex­port­ing crude oil could have on con­sumers. Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Chair­man Robert Men­en­dez, D-N.J., in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion earli­er this year aimed at tamp­ing down ex­ports of pet­ro­leum products de­rived from crude oil pumped from fed­er­al lands. He ex­pressed con­fid­ence that he can garner sup­port for it.

“Many of the same people who wanted to elim­in­ate tax sub­sidies for big oil also be­lieve that keep­ing oil in the United States is what’s in the best in­terest for con­sumers,” said Men­en­dez, who has led the (so far un­suc­cess­ful) ef­fort to re­peal oil and gas tax breaks.

On Monday, the sen­at­or re­newed his push for few­er ex­ports, send­ing a let­ter to Pres­id­ent Obama ex­press­ing con­cern about com­ments En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz made that in­dic­ated he may be open to lift­ing the ban. Men­en­dez said Tues­day he hadn’t heard back from the ad­min­is­tra­tion yet on his let­ter.

Mean­while, one big com­pon­ent of this de­bate will simply be to edu­cate mem­bers about the is­sue.

“Nev­er thought about it really,” Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said when asked wheth­er he sup­ports ex­port­ing crude oil. “I think ba­sic­ally un­til we be­come en­ergy in­de­pend­ent we ought to care­fully con­sider what we do with our en­ergy re­sources, ab­so­lutely.”

What We're Following See More »
FUNDING RUNS OUT ON FRIDAY
Federal Agencies Prepare for Govt Shutdown
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

As Congress continues to bicker on riders to a continuing resolution, federal agencies have started working with the Office of Management and Budget to prepare for a government shutdown, which will occur if no continuing resolution is passed by 11:59 p.m. on Friday night. The OMB held a call with agencies on Sept. 23, one that is required one week before a possible shutdown. The government last shut down for 16 days in 2013, and multiple shutdowns have been narrowly avoided since then. It is expected that Congress will reach a deal before the clock strikes midnight, but until it does, preparations will continue.

Source:
OBAMA’S ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY IN THE BALANCE
Obama’s Clean Power Plan Faces Courts
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

President Obama's Clean Power Plan, a large pillar of his efforts to leave a lasting environmental legacy, "goes before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today." The plan "imposes the first national limits on carbon pollution from power plants." A number of consolidated cases finds 27 states challenging this plan, which was blocked by the Supreme Court in February pending decisions from lower courts. The states will argue that the government doesn't have the right to impose restrictions requiring them to shutter plans and restructure full industries.

Source:
UNCLEAR IF THIS WILL AFFECT POLLS
Instant Reaction: Clinton Won Debate
1 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

There seems to be a clear consensus forming about Monday's debate: Hillary Clinton was the winner. One focus group of undecided Pennsylvania voters, conducted by GOP pollster Frank Luntz, found 16 favored Clinton while five picked Donald Trump. In a Florida focus group organized by CNN, 18 of 20 undecided voters saw Clinton as the winner.

DIDN’T BECAUSE CHELSEA WAS IN THE ROOM
Trump Wanted to Bring Up Bill Clinton
2 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

As both candidates walked off the stage, Donald Trump lauded himself for being restrained and for not bringing up Bill Clinton. "I didn’t want to say—her husband was in the room along with her daughter, who I think is a very nice young lady—and I didn’t want to say what I was going to say about what’s been going on in their life," Trump said. Trump claims he stopped himself from hitting Bill Clinton because daughter Chelsea was in the room.

Source:
REPEATS CONTROVERSIAL CLAIM
Trump: Clinton “Doesn’t Have The Stamina” to be President
13 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE

At the end of the debate, moderator Lester Holt asked Donald Trump if he stands by his statement that Hillary Clinton didn't have the look of a president. Trump responded by saying Holt misquoted him, instead saying that Clinton "doesn't have the stamina." Clinton responded by saying that when Trump visits 112 countries as secretary of state, he can talk to her about stamina.

×