Forget Keystone. Will Podesta Put Arctic Drilling in His Crosshairs?

Oil companies aren't scaling bridges, but they have their own issues with Obama's Arctic drilling plan.
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
Jan. 2, 2014, 12:18 a.m.

The White House re­cently put out word that John Podesta won’t get near the Key­stone Pipeline re­view when the Demo­crat­ic uber-strategist — and Key­stone foe — joins Pres­id­ent Obama’s in­ner circle.

But en­vir­on­ment­al­ists hope Podesta will in­flu­ence an­oth­er high-stakes battle over oil de­vel­op­ment.

Podesta op­poses oil drilling in Arc­tic wa­ters off Alaska’s coast, and he’s ar­riv­ing as Obama’s In­teri­or De­part­ment is fa­cing some big de­cisions about the re­gion.

“Even after they said he was go­ing to re­cuse him­self on Key­stone, we are still op­tim­ist­ic about his role on the Ar­tic [Na­tion­al Wild­life] Refuge and Arc­tic Ocean is­sues,” said Ath­an Manuel, the Si­erra Club’s dir­ect­or of lands pro­tec­tion.

Podesta, in Janu­ary of 2013, penned a column for Bloomberg with former White House en­ergy czar Car­ol Brown­er that ar­gues, “There is no safe and re­spons­ible way to drill for oil and gas in the Arc­tic Ocean.”

Brown­er is a seni­or fel­low at the Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress, the lib­er­al think tank and ad­vocacy group that Podesta foun­ded a dec­ade ago.

Wheth­er Podesta will en­gage on the top­ic re­mains un­clear.

White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney said in mid-Decem­ber that Podesta, who is join­ing the White House for a year, will have a “par­tic­u­lar fo­cus on is­sues of en­ergy and cli­mate change.”

But a White House aide con­tac­ted by Na­tion­al Journ­al did not ad­dress wheth­er Podesta’s port­fo­lio will in­clude Arc­tic drilling.

In­teri­or did not re­spond to an in­quiry.

It’s something to watch as 2014 be­gins.

The Bloomberg column puts Podesta to the left of the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, which has cau­tiously en­dorsed oil drilling off Alaska’s north­ern coast along­side beefed-up safe­guards. But the scope and tim­ing of what’s al­lowed isn’t fully settled.

In­teri­or is plan­ning to auc­tion new leases in Arc­tic wa­ters off Alaska’s north­ern coast in 2016 and 2017, but must first de­cide on the geo­graph­ic scope of the sales and oth­er spe­cif­ics that com­pan­ies and en­vir­on­ment­al­ists will closely mon­it­or.

In the near­er term, In­teri­or is work­ing on a set of Arc­tic-spe­cif­ic drilling safety stand­ards; a pro­pos­al is ex­pec­ted early this year.

In­teri­or is also re­view­ing a scaled-back Arc­tic ex­plor­a­tion plan from Roy­al Dutch Shell. The oil gi­ant’s mis­hap-laden, 2012 launch of pre­lim­in­ary de­vel­op­ment promp­ted Podesta and Brown­er to ar­gue that they no longer be­lieve Arc­tic drilling should pro­ceed.

Shell re­treated and didn’t seek to drill in 2013, but the com­pany is now seek­ing ap­prov­al from reg­u­lat­ors to re­launch a more lim­ited ex­plor­at­ory drilling ef­fort as soon as next sum­mer.

En­vir­on­ment­al­ists hope Podesta will be an ally as In­teri­or faces im­port­ant de­cisions.

“We hope that he is go­ing be the per­son who takes a step back and looks at all of these de­cisions as a whole and slows down and … po­ten­tially stops some of the pro­cesses,” said Kristen Miller, gov­ern­ment-af­fairs dir­ect­or for the Alaska Wil­der­ness League.

Act­iv­ists want drilling of ex­ist­ing leases and new auc­tions hal­ted or delayed, ar­guing that fed­er­al of­fi­cials have yet to en­sure enough pro­tec­tions for wild­life and for nat­ive Alaskans who rely on the Arc­tic wa­ters for food.

“Si­erra Club would still ul­ti­mately make the case that they should can­cel those lease sales,” Manuel said.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
2 days ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
2 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
3 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login