Are Utilities Wilting From Heat of Solar Competition?

A man brooms in front of a house with solar panels on the roof in Grevenbroich near Aachen, southern Germany on September 11, 2012.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Dec. 23, 2013, 12:36 a.m.

Sol­ar en­ergy has be­come in­creas­ingly power­ful. Its rise to the top, however, hasn’t been without a few bumps along the way. 

Reg­u­lat­ory battles pit­ting the sol­ar in­dustry against power com­pan­ies in a fight over pay­ment mod­els played out in sev­er­al states this year. As the dust settles, sol­ar pro­viders are claim­ing vic­tory. Util­it­ies, on the oth­er hand, are try­ing to re­frame the con­ver­sa­tion en­tirely by in­sist­ing they aren’t an en­emy of the in­dustry.

Much of the de­bate so far has centered around a policy on the books in 43 states called net-meter­ing. Net-meter­ing al­lows rooftop sol­ar own­ers to sell ex­cess elec­tri­city back to the grid, with util­it­ies is­su­ing full re­tail cred­it to the cus­tom­er based on the amount of power they provide.

Util­it­ies are push­ing to scale back or get rid of net-meter­ing, call­ing it a sub­sidy that sol­ar has out­grown. The rooftop sol­ar in­dustry, on the oth­er hand, has res­isted the fight to dis­mantle net-meter­ing, ar­guing that it’s an equit­able way of pay­ing for power gen­er­a­tion.

In a series of high-pro­file cases this year in Ari­zona, Cali­for­nia, Idaho, and Louisi­ana, state law­makers and reg­u­lat­ory com­mis­sion­ers sided with in­dustry and moved to either up­hold or strengthen net-meter­ing.

“The na­tion­al story right now is quite clear,” said Bry­an Miller, the pres­id­ent of the Al­li­ance for Sol­ar Choice, a sol­ar-ad­vocacy or­gan­iz­a­tion. “There have now been four ma­jor ver­dicts on net-meter­ing, and in every case pro­posed reg­u­lat­ory changes to the policy have been re­jec­ted.”

A second point of con­ten­tion has been wheth­er util­it­ies should charge sol­ar cus­tom­ers ex­tra. Util­it­ies say ad­di­tion­al fees are needed to de­fray the cost of grid up­keep. Op­pon­ents say power com­pan­ies simply want to stamp out com­pet­i­tion.

In Novem­ber, Geor­gia Power backed down from a pro­pos­al to tack on fees for rooftop sol­ar cus­tom­ers amid pres­sure from con­sumer ad­voc­ates and sol­ar boost­ers. And in Idaho, the state pub­lic util­it­ies com­mis­sion re­jec­ted a sim­il­ar pro­pos­al.

Ari­zona bucked the trend when the Ari­zona Cor­por­a­tion Com­mis­sion de­cided that Ari­zona Pub­lic Ser­vice, the state’s largest util­ity com­pany, could hike rates for sol­ar cus­tom­ers.

It sounds like a win for the util­ity. But sol­ar groups say it’s not.

“In Ari­zona, APS got a lot less [in terms of the fee] then what they were ask­ing for,” Miller com­men­ted. “They wanted the fees to be some­where in the range of 50 to 100 dol­lars so the fi­nal rul­ing shows the polit­ic­al bound­ar­ies of the is­sue. And at the same time the com­mis­sion up­held net-meter­ing.”

Util­it­ies pro­viders, un­sur­pris­ingly, have a some­what dif­fer­ent per­spect­ive. 

“The com­mis­sion’s de­cision re­cog­nizes there is a cost shift oc­cur­ring where sol­ar users aren’t pay­ing what they should for use of the grid,” said Dav­id Owens, the ex­ec­ut­ive vice pres­id­ent of the Edis­on Elec­tric In­sti­tute, a trade as­so­ci­ation for U.S. in­vestor-owned elec­tric com­pan­ies.

Sol­ar groups gained more ground than they lost this year. But de­clar­a­tions of vic­tory by either side fail to cap­ture the whole pic­ture. 

“There is an un­fair char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion of util­it­ies versus sol­ar,” Owens said. “I’m not afraid of rooftop sol­ar. We see op­por­tun­it­ies there and we’re in­vest­ing in util­ity scale and oth­er sol­ar pro­jects. We’re not anti-sol­ar at all.”

What is clear is that head­ing in­to next year the ques­tion of sol­ar power pay­ment has not been re­solved.

State-level de­cisions im­pact­ing net-meter­ing and fees for sol­ar cus­tom­ers are be­gin­ing to look like just the start of a much lar­ger con­ver­sa­tion around re­work­ing util­ity pay­ment struc­tures in the age of dis­trib­uted gen­er­a­tion, an era whose hall­mark will be cus­tom­ers that cre­ate their own elec­tri­city without need­ing to rely on a cent­ral­ized power gen­er­at­or.

Both sides know the con­ver­sa­tion is com­ing, if it hasn’t already ar­rived.

“What we need to be talk­ing about is what’s the best way to al­loc­ate costs and how can we do this equit­ably and con­tin­ue to en­hance the grid,” Owens said. “What we’ve seen this year is a re­cog­ni­tion in vari­ous states that cur­rent rate-design struc­tures are not work­ing and they need to be re­vis­ited.”

For once, rooftop sol­ar ad­voc­ates don’t dis­agree. 

“I think we’re see­ing is that reg­u­lat­ors real­ize that you have to ad­dress these is­sues in the con­text of rate design,” Miller said. “The main thing is that when we look at rate design as a whole, sol­ar shouldn’t be made a tar­get.”

What We're Following See More »
BUT IS HE A YES VOTE?
Cornyn Attempting to Get McCain Back for Health Vote
7 minutes ago
THE LATEST
“TIME HAD RUN OUT” FOR ILL BABY
Charlie Gard’s Parents End Legal Fight
31 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"A lawyer representing Chris Gard and Connie Yates told the High Court 'time had run out' for the baby. Mr. Gard said it meant his 'sweet, gorgeous, innocent little boy' will not reach his first birthday on 4 August. 'To let our beautiful little Charlie go' is 'the hardest thing we'll ever have to do,' his mother said. Charlie's parents said they made the decision because a US doctor had told them it was now too late to give Charlie nucleoside therapy.

Source:
AGENCY SOUGHT TO DELAY IMPLEMENTATION
11 States Sue EPA Over Chemical Rule
33 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"Eleven states have sued the Environmental Protection Agency over its June decision to delay implementation of a chemical safety rule" until 2019. "The state attorneys general, led by New York’s Eric Schneiderman (D), argue the rule is important for 'protecting our workers, first-responders and communities from chemical accidents' and should be allowed to take affect as planned by the Obama administration’s EPA.

Source:
ULTIMATUM ON ACA
Trump: You’re With Us Or Against Us
51 minutes ago
THE LATEST
$1.6 BILLION SET ASIDE FOR WALL
House Freedom Caucus Chair: Shutdown Over Wall Funding Unlikely
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) on Monday said that funding for President Trump's controversial border wall is unlikely to cause a government shutdown. 'The odds of a government shutdown are very minimal when it comes to that,' the conservative lawmaker said at an event in Washington, D.C. 'I do think the funding of the border wall will happen,' he added. Appropriators have set aside $1.6 billion to fund new wall and fencing sections on parts of the U.S.-Mexico border covering a few dozen miles."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login