You’re Probably Paying Too Much for Your Health Insurance “¦ and It’s Your Fault

New research suggests consumers continually pick more expensive plans than they need.

MIAMI, FL - DECEMBER 23: Certified Enrollment Specialist, Julienne Fontes, (R) helps Elva Garcia (L) and Jorge Codevila through the options available to them under the Affordable Care Act at a Miami Enrollment Assistance Center on December 23, 2013 in Miami, Florida. In a symbolic gesture ,U.S. President Obama signed up in the federal health care insurance. The goverment announced today that people will have a grace period exending into tomorow to enroll for a plan that would start January 1st. 
National Journal
Clara Ritger
Add to Briefcase
Clara Ritger
Dec. 24, 2013, midnight

Health in­sur­ance shop­pers do a ter­rible job of pick­ing the plan that will serve them best, ac­cord­ing to a new study.

The study presen­ted sub­jects with health in­sur­ance web­sites that mir­ror the ex­changes set up by the Af­ford­able Care Act and asked them to pick a plan. The res­ults were not pretty: Left to their own devices, con­sumers who se­lec­ted their own plans ended up only slightly bet­ter off than they would have had their plans been as­signed ran­domly.

When giv­en four op­tions, the con­sumers chose the most cost-ef­fect­ive plan only 42 per­cent of the time. When giv­en eight op­tions, the suc­cess rate plummeted to 21 per­cent — a rate in­dis­tin­guish­able from ran­dom as­sign­ments.

The re­search­ers then re­peated the study, but this time with ad­ded “cost cal­cu­lat­ors” on the mock web­site aimed at help­ing con­sumers. Even then, shop­pers picked the most cost-ef­fect­ive op­tion only 47 per­cent of the time, typ­ic­ally choos­ing plans that would cost them an ex­tra $364.

In a fi­nal it­er­a­tion, re­search­ers offered the shop­ping choices to M.B.A. stu­dents en­rolled in a con­sumer fin­ance class. In this pool — where more than half of the sub­jects came from con­sult­ing or fin­an­cial-ser­vices re­lated fields — con­sumers made the most cost-ef­fect­ive choice 73 per­cent of the time, and the av­er­age mis­take dropped to $126.

Doubts about shop­pers’ abil­ity rep­res­ent a chal­lenge for Obama­care, which is aimed at curb­ing the coun­try’s ex­pand­ing health costs while al­low­ing con­sumers to pick their own plans on the on­line ex­changes.

“If con­sumers can’t identi­fy the most cost-ef­fi­cient plan for their needs, the ex­changes will fail to pro­duce com­pet­it­ive pres­sures on health care pro­viders and bring down costs across the board, one of the main ad­vant­ages of re­ly­ing upon choice and mar­kets,” said Eric John­son, a Columbia Uni­versity busi­ness school pro­fess­or who coau­thored the study.

But why did con­sumers fail to pick the prop­er plan?

The re­search­ers con­cluded that while the math is daunt­ing, the fact that the cost cal­cu­lat­ors did little to im­prove out­comes sug­gests there’s more to the prob­lem.

Con­sumers tend to over­weigh the im­port­ance of premi­ums and un­der­es­tim­ate the costs from de­duct­ibles and out-of-pock­et con­tri­bu­tions, the re­search­ers wrote. Low premi­um pay­ments are at­tract­ive, but for someone who uses a lot of health ser­vices, the high de­duct­ible that of­ten ac­com­pan­ies the low premi­um means the con­sumer will pay the full cost of care un­til he or she reaches the de­duct­ible, when in­sur­ance kicks in and starts to share a por­tion of those ex­penses.

The re­search­ers say the dam­age done by poor con­sumer choices can be at least partly off­set by well-de­signed ex­changes.

“The bad news: Con­sumers left to their own devices seem to make large er­rors when choos­ing health in­sur­ance, sug­gest­ing that they will se­lect op­tions that are not cost ef­fi­cient and they seem to be un­aware of their fail­ure,” they wrote. “The good news is that we have demon­strated that ex­change de­sign­ers can im­prove con­sumers’ per­form­ance markedly through the use of just-in-time edu­ca­tion, smart de­faults, and cost cal­cu­lat­ors.”

Spe­cific­ally, the re­search­ers urge the web­sites to sort plans by cost, to present “qual­ity cues,” or to lim­it the num­ber of choices presen­ted to plans that meet cer­tain cri­ter­ia of cost ef­fect­ive­ness.

Along with John­son, re­search­ers from Columbia’s psy­cho­logy de­part­ment, the Uni­versity of Pennsylvania, the Hebrew Uni­versity of Jer­u­s­alem, and the Uni­versity of Miami worked on the study.

What We're Following See More »
MAY 18
Trump Comms Director Resigns
2 minutes ago
BREAKING

Mike Dubke, Donald Trump's communications director, has resigned his post in the White House. Dubke offered his resignation on May 18, but offered to stay on through the completion of Trump's first foreign trip to allow for a smoother transition. Trump immediately accepted Dubke's resignation when it was offered. There have been weeks of rumblings that Trump was considering a major shakeup to his advisers, specifically citing Trump's discontent with his communications shop.

CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login