Judge Says Border Officials Can Search Your Laptop, Cellphone

A Border Patrol officer inspects vehicles at a checkpoint near the Mexican border at the town of Tombstone, Arizona on April 21, 2010.
National Journal
Aliya Sternstein, Nextgov
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Aliya Sternstein, Nextgov
Jan. 2, 2014, 7:21 a.m.

A fed­er­al court on Tues­day up­held a Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment policy that al­lows au­thor­it­ies at bor­der check­points to search laptops and oth­er elec­tron­ic devices be­long­ing to U.S. cit­izens and for­eign­ers.

A gradu­ate stu­dent and sev­er­al civil liber­ties groups in 2010 sued the gov­ern­ment to stop a 2009 DHS dir­ect­ive au­thor­iz­ing the in­spec­tion of any elec­tron­ic devices trav­el­ers carry across an in­ter­na­tion­al bor­der in­to the United States. Pas­cal Abidor, a 26-year-old stu­dent at the Mc­Gill Uni­versity In­sti­tute of Is­lam­ic Stud­ies in Montreal, al­leged au­thor­it­ies searched his laptop for five hours, view­ing at least one doc­u­ment re­lated to his dis­ser­ta­tion. He was then ordered to write down his pass­word and hand over the device. Abidor’s laptop and ex­tern­al drive were re­turned to him 11 days later, after, ac­cord­ing to Abidor, they had been phys­ic­ally opened and vari­ous files on the laptop and ex­tern­al drive had been viewed.

He and fel­low plaintiffs ar­gued that Home­land Se­cur­ity’s policy on bor­der searches of elec­tron­ic devices vi­ol­ates Fourth Amend­ment pro­tec­tions against un­reas­on­able searches and seizures.

On Tues­day, the U.S. Dis­trict Court of the East­ern Dis­trict of New York ruled in a 32-page de­cision that au­thor­it­ies had reas­on­able sus­pi­cion to in­vest­ig­ate due to a com­bin­a­tion of sev­er­al factors, in­clud­ing wi­thold­ing in­form­a­tion about his visas.

Al­though Abidor told of­ficers he was liv­ing in Canada, he held both U.S. and French pass­ports, and ini­tially he did not pro­duce the pass­port con­tain­ing visas from Le­ban­on and Jordan, the opin­ion states. “The agents cer­tainly had reas­on­able sus­pi­cion sup­port­ing fur­ther in­spec­tion of Abidor’s elec­tron­ic devices,” U.S. Dis­trict Judge Ed­ward R. Kor­man wrote in the court de­cision.

The in­cid­ent began at an in­spec­tion point along an Amtrak route from Montreal to New York City. Abidor told an of­ficer that he had briefly lived in Jordan and vis­ited Le­ban­on in the pre­vi­ous year. The of­ficer asked him to turn on the laptop, after which the of­ficer ex­amined cer­tain pic­tures that de­pic­ted ral­lies of Hamas and Hezbol­lah, both of which were des­ig­nated by the State De­part­ment as ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tions. When Abidor was asked why he was in­ter­ested in these im­ages, he ex­plained that his re­search fo­cused on the mod­ern his­tory of Shiites in Le­ban­on. “Even if this may have ex­plained the pic­tures of Hezbol­lah, it did not ex­plain why Abidor saved the pic­tures of Hamas, a ter­ror­ist or­gan­iz­a­tion not com­posed of Shiites and not based in Le­ban­on,” Kor­man wrote.

The Justice De­part­ment moved to dis­miss the case on the grounds that, ac­cord­ing to a 2004 Su­preme Court de­cision, “searches made at the bor­der, pur­su­ant to the long­stand­ing right of the sov­er­eign to pro­tect it­self by stop­ping and ex­amin­ing per­sons and prop­erty cross­ing in­to this coun­try, are reas­on­able simply by vir­tue of the fact that they oc­cur at the bor­der.”

Quot­ing Mi­chael Cher­toff, who served as DHS sec­ret­ary when the laptop policy took ef­fect, the opin­ion stated, “Since the found­ing of the re­pub­lic, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment has held broad au­thor­ity to con­duct searches at the bor­der to pre­vent the entry of dan­ger­ous people and goods. In the 21st cen­tury, the most dan­ger­ous con­tra­band is of­ten con­tained in laptop com­puters or oth­er elec­tron­ic devices, not on pa­per. This in­cludes ter­ror­ist ma­ter­i­als and despic­able im­ages of child por­no­graphy.”

Some files in­spec­ted re­vealed in­tim­ate de­tails about Abidor’s life, such as a tran­script of a chat with his girl­friend, cop­ies of email cor­res­pond­ence, class notes, journ­al art­icles, his tax re­turns, and his gradu­ate school tran­script, ac­cord­ing to court doc­u­ments.

The Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on is con­sid­er­ing ap­peal­ing the rul­ing, Cath­er­ine Crump, an ACLU at­tor­ney who ar­gued the case, said in an email on Tues­day af­ter­noon.

“We’re dis­ap­poin­ted in today’s de­cision, which al­lows the gov­ern­ment to con­duct in­trus­ive searches of Amer­ic­ans’ laptops and oth­er elec­tron­ics at the bor­der without any sus­pi­cion that those devices con­tain evid­ence of wrong­do­ing,” Crump said in a state­ment. “Un­for­tu­nately, these searches are part of a broad­er pat­tern of ag­gress­ive gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance that col­lects in­form­a­tion on too many in­no­cent people, un­der lax stand­ards, and without ad­equate over­sight.”

DHS and Justice De­part­ment of­fi­cials were un­able to im­me­di­ately com­ment on the rul­ing.

More from Nex­t­gov, our sis­ter site:

The Top 5 Gov­ern­ment Tech Stor­ies of 2013

Why Aren’t More Feds Tele­work­ing?

The Ten Worst Hacks of 2013

What We're Following See More »
HEALTH IN QUESTION
Sen. Cochran Back to Washington Tuesday
11 hours ago
THE LATEST
WROTE LAW THAT WEAKENED OPIOID OVERSIGHT
Trump: Marino Withdrawing Nomination for Drug Czar
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
Doesn’t Express Confidence in Marino
Trump to Declare Opioid Emergency Next Week
1 days ago
THE LATEST

After initially promising it in August, "President Trump said Monday that he will declare a national emergency next week to address the opioid epidemic." When asked, he also "declined to express confidence in Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), his nominee for drug czar, in the wake of revelations that the lawmaker helped steer legislation making it harder to act against giant drug companies."

Source:
IN LIGHT OF 60 MINUTES REVELATIONS
Manchin Asks Trump to Drop Marino’s Nomination for Drug Czar
1 days ago
THE LATEST
WOULD OVERTURN MARINO LEGISLATION ON DRUG DISTRIBUTORS
McCaskill Will Introduce Bill in Response to “60 Minutes” Scoop
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login