House Republicans will start the year with legislation aimed at security requirements for Obamacare’s health insurance exchanges.
The House next week will consider legislation that would require the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to notify consumers whenever a security breach occurs, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor announced Thursday in a memo to Republicans.
Under present policy, CMS evaluates whether consumer data were at risk when deciding if an issue warrants notification — but Cantor wants to make notification automatic.
“If a breach occurs, it shouldn’t be up to some bureaucrat to decide when or even whether to inform an individual that their personal information has been accessed,” Cantor said in the memo.
The legislation would address other security concerns, he said, citing Republican Reps. Diane Black of Tennessee, Kerry Bentivolio of Michigan, and Gus Bilirakis of Florida among those who have proposed similar measures.
Security and privacy concerns have been the focus of a handful of hearings on Capitol Hill, where documents revealed that the Health and Human Services Department and contractors involved in the creation of HealthCare.gov were concerned in the days and weeks leading up to the website’s launch.
Ultimately, the move is a part of the House Republican goal to repeal and replace the president’s health law.
Drew Hammill, spokesman for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, called Cantor’s announcement a partisan game.
House Republicans “continue to remain intent on undermining or repealing the Affordable Care Act at every turn, and that effort even extends to scaring their constituents from obtaining health coverage,” Hammill said in a press release.
The question of data security on the exchanges is hotly contested. Republicans argue the administration is downplaying concerns to protect the law’s standing and encourage enrollment, while Democrats argue the GOP is overstating the problems and crafting legislation to bring more attention to them.
In December, Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., released part of a classified HHS briefing that reported only 32 security incidents since Oct. 1, none of which involved a successful theft of any information.
Some 2.1 million Americans signed up for private health insurance on the exchanges in time for Jan. 1 coverage, as long as they paid their premiums. The Obama administration has repeatedly said in congressional hearings that it does not believe consumer data to be at risk, because the data hub used by HealthCare.gov to verify identity and income does not store personal information.
The House returns Tuesday, Jan. 7.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."