Oil-Train Crashes Spur Safety Scrutiny

Scorched oil tankers remain on July 10, 2013 at the train derailment site in Lac-Megantic, Quebec. Edward Bukhardt, CEO of Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railways Inc.,(MMA) told reporters Wednesday that the train was left running while the engineer spent the night sleeping in a hotel in Nantes, adding that the engineer was following standard 'industry practice.' The train carrying crude oil from North Dakota derailed in the town of Lac-Megantic overnight Friday, causing a massive fire and explosions that killedat least 15 people, with another 45 still missing.
National Journal
Clare Foran
Add to Briefcase
Clare Foran
Jan. 3, 2014, 3:12 a.m.

Rail-safety ad­voc­ates and mem­bers of Con­gress are call­ing for stricter tank-car safety stand­ards in the wake of a ma­jor oil-by-rail ac­ci­dent this week, an ap­peal that took on new ur­gency Thursday with the re­lease of a fed­er­al ad­vis­ory that oil from North Dakota’s Bakken form­a­tion may be more flam­mable than oth­er types of crude.

A train car­ry­ing crude oil from the Bakken ran off the rails near Cas­selton, N.D., on Monday, lead­ing to a vol­un­tary evac­u­ation of nearby res­id­ents. The ac­ci­dent oc­curred when freight cars car­ry­ing crude oil struck a train that had de­railed earli­er in the day. No in­jur­ies were re­por­ted but the crash sparked an in­ferno and re­ignited con­cerns over the po­ten­tial dangers of ship­ping oil by rail.

The event is the latest in a series of ac­ci­dents in­volving rail trans­port of crude in re­cent months and has spurred a re­newed push for over­sight and reg­u­la­tion of rail cars trav­el­ing to and from oil-rich states.

“We be­lieve the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment needs to act to im­prove stand­ards for the design and con­struc­tion of tank cars,” said Patti Re­illy of the As­so­ci­ation of Amer­ic­an Rail­roads, a trade group for ma­jor North Amer­ic­an freight rail­roads. “It is our hope that they step up and de­mand the safest tank car pos­sible both for new con­struc­tion and for ret­ro­fit­ting of the ex­ist­ing fleet.”

With do­mest­ic oil-pro­duc­tion sur­ging due to ad­vances in drilling tech­niques, oil-by-rail ship­ments have ex­pan­ded ex­po­nen­tially. This has caused pro­ponents of stricter rail-safety stand­ards to step up ef­forts to spur re­form. De­bate con­tin­ues, however, over which branch of gov­ern­ment should take the lead in tight­en­ing stand­ards.

A few months after a train car­ry­ing North Dakota crude de­railed in Lac-Megant­ic, Que­bec, in Ju­ly, the Trans­port­a­tion De­part­ment’s Pipeline and Haz­ard­ous Ma­ter­i­als Safety Ad­min­is­tra­tion is­sued an ad­vance no­tice of pro­posed rule­mak­ing to strengthen reg­u­la­tions for rail trans­port of haz­ard­ous ma­ter­i­als. And on Thursday, PHMSA cir­cu­lated a safety alert that Bakken crude may be more likely than oth­er vari­et­ies of crude to ig­nite in the event of a rail crash.

“Rail safety is a na­tion­al pri­or­ity, and we have been ag­gress­ively tak­ing ac­tion on mul­tiple fronts to mit­ig­ate risks,” said Jean­nie Shif­fer, a Trans­port­a­tion De­part­ment spokes­wo­man. “[As the] rule­mak­ing moves for­ward, we will con­tin­ue tak­ing ac­tion whenev­er ne­ces­sary to en­sure the safe trans­port­a­tion of haz­ard­ous ma­ter­i­als by rail.”

But fed­er­al reg­u­lat­ory re­form will take a long time to crys­tal­lize, and law­makers are look­ing to fill the void.

“Right now, we have slow-mov­ing fed­er­al bur­eau­cracy and ma­jor push­back from private in­vestors who own the rail cars, and both those things add up to a need for con­gres­sion­al ac­tion,” Rep. Peter De­Fazio, D-Ore., a mem­ber of the House Trans­port­a­tion and In­fra­struc­ture Sub­com­mit­tee on Rail­roads, Pipelines, and Haz­ard­ous Ma­ter­i­als, said in an in­ter­view Thursday. “First, Con­gress should man­date that with­in a cer­tain peri­od of time you can’t use a DOT-111 car [com­monly used to trans­port crude oil] that hasn’t been ret­ro­fit­ted, and that would be a short-term solu­tion while we de­cide on a new, bet­ter design for these cars; and then that new design would be man­dated along with a phaseout of the old cars.”

De­Fazio ac­know­ledged a dif­fi­cult road ahead, though. “I don’t think Con­gress has the where­with­al to man­date the new design, but I cer­tainly in­tend to ask for hear­ings on this is­sue,” he said. “That’s all I can do.”

On the oth­er side of Cap­it­ol Hill, a spokes­man for the Sen­ate Com­merce, Sci­ence, and Trans­port­a­tion Com­mit­tee said Chair­man Jay Rock­e­feller, D-W.Va., is mon­it­or­ing the is­sue.

“The series of re­cent de­rail­ments and ser­i­ous ac­ci­dents in­volving crude oil is alarm­ing and de­mands closer scru­tiny,” the spokes­man said. “Re­gard­less of how crude is shipped, Sen­at­or Rock­e­feller be­lieves that it must be done in the safest man­ner pos­sible.”

What We're Following See More »
WILL U.S. RESPOND?
Russia Accidentally Bombs U.S.-Backed Syrian Forces
2 hours ago
BREAKING
CARSON UP NEXT
Zinke Confirmed As Interior Secretary
4 hours ago
BREAKING
GOODLATTE SENDING LETTER TO SESSIONS THIS WEEK
House GOP Blocks Dems on Trump Ethics
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

On a party-line vote, "the House Judiciary Committee defeated a Democratic effort Tuesday to obtain any information the Justice Department has on possible conflicts, ethical violations or improper connections to Russia by President Donald Trump and his associates. The committee’s Republican chairman, Bob Goodlatte, opposed the resolution, even as he acknowledged the Justice Department hasn’t acted on his own request for a briefing on alleged Russian interference with the U.S. election and potential ties to the Trump campaign." He said he'll be sending a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions requesting him to pursue "all legitimate investigative leads" into those matters.

Source:
WAITING FOR NEWS CYCLE TO REFRESH
Trump Holds Off on New Travel Ban
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump won’t sign a revised travel ban on Wednesday as had been anticipated, two senior administration officials confirmed. One of the officials indicated that the delay was due to the busy news cycle, and that when Trump does sign the revised order, he wanted it to get plenty of attention."

Source:
BUT THEY MUST PAY
Donald Trump Affirms Support For NATO
17 hours ago
UPDATE

Near the end of his speech Tuesday, Donald Trump made a firm proclamation affirming his support for NATO. "We strongly support NATO, an alliance forged through the bonds of two World Wars that dethroned fascism, and a Cold War that defeated communism," Trump said. However, he continued on, "our partners must meet their financial obligations."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login