The Next Fight Over Military Sexual Assault Is Already Here

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) speaks while U.S. military leaders testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee on pending legislation regarding sexual assaults in the military June 4, 2013.
Win McNamee/Getty Images
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Jan. 5, 2014, 7 a.m.

The battle over sexu­al as­sault in the mil­it­ary is back.

When the Sen­ate re­con­venes this month, mem­bers will im­me­di­ately dive in­to a le­gis­lat­ive struggle over how the armed ser­vices deals with ac­cus­a­tions of sexu­al as­sault with­in their own ranks. And as it does, two high-pro­file Demo­crats — one a rising star in the party and the oth­er a battle-tested mod­er­ate hold­ing a red-state seat — will re­sume their in­tern­al scrap over the is­sue.

Both New York’s Kirsten Gil­librand and Mis­souri’s Claire Mc­Caskill agree the mil­it­ary needs to change the way it handles as­sault cases, but they have com­pet­ing pro­pos­als on how to do it.

Mc­Caskill’s camp be­lieves that Gil­librand’s plan would ac­tu­ally hurt the ef­fort to fight sexu­al as­sault in the armed forces. And while they com­pete for their pro­pos­als, re­la­tions between the pair have be­come in­creas­ingly tense.

“I’m frus­trated that the re­forms that we have done have not got­ten the at­ten­tion they de­serve,” Mc­Caskill said in Novem­ber of her dis­pute with Gil­librand. “I’m not sure that I’ve done so well at the pub­lic re­la­tions on this; I’ll give that to her.”

In­deed, 2013 saw Con­gress take ac­tion. The Sen­ate’s fi­nal act of the year was to pass the 2014 de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion act, which in­cluded more than 30 re­forms to ad­dress sexu­al as­saults in the mil­it­ary.

But with the De­part­ment of De­fense es­tim­at­ing 26,000 sexu­al as­saults in the mil­it­ary in 2012, of which only 3,300 were re­por­ted, both le­gis­lat­ors want to go fur­ther.

Mc­Caskill is pro­pos­ing a pack­age of more mod­er­ate re­forms that would in­crease com­mand­er ac­count­ab­il­ity, al­low sur­viv­ors to chal­lenge un­fair dis­charge from the ser­vice, and stop sol­diers from us­ing good mil­it­ary char­ac­ter as a de­fense. The plan is non­con­tro­ver­sial, en­joys broad bi­par­tis­an sup­port, and is ex­pec­ted to be ad­op­ted eas­ily whenev­er it comes up for a vote.

But it doesn’t in­clude one of the most highly sought-after re­forms by vic­tim ad­voc­ates: strip­ping the chain of com­mand of its power to de­cide wheth­er sexu­al as­sault cases are pro­sec­uted.

The Pentagon is staunchly op­posed to that pro­pos­al, but Gil­librand pushed le­gis­la­tion to make the change in 2013 and says she’ll keep fight­ing for it when the Sen­ate re­turns. Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id plans to put the meas­ure on the Sen­ate sched­ule as soon as Janu­ary.

“We are go­ing to have an up or down vote on the bill, prob­ably in Janu­ary,” Gil­librand said in an in­ter­view be­fore the Sen­ate ad­journed. “I will use this in­ter­im time to con­tin­ue to build sup­port. We prob­ably have a dozen un­de­cided sen­at­ors that I’m hop­ing this will give an op­por­tun­ity to make sure they meet with sur­viv­ors from their states.”

Fifty-three mem­bers are pub­licly sup­port­ing Gil­librand. But she is fa­cing an up­hill chal­lenge to se­cure a su­per­ma­jor­ity of 60, which will likely be ne­ces­sary to move the meas­ure through the Sen­ate.

“There is so much ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion that has been com­ing out in the last month that I’m hop­ing it provides the time to give that in­form­a­tion to those who are con­sid­er­ing it and weigh­ing it,” she said.

The Sen­ate was ex­pec­ted to vote on both Gil­librand’s and Mc­Caskill’s meas­ures in Novem­ber, but law­makers failed to reach an agree­ment to do so.

Mc­Caskill, who has long worked on sexu­al-as­sault is­sues and is more seni­or than Gil­librand on the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee, has emerged as Gil­librand’s top op­pon­ent in the re­form de­bate. She ar­gues that Gil­librand’s meas­ure will not res­ult in put­ting more per­pet­rat­ors be­hind bars and has taken great lengths to kill her rival’s bill.

As the duo con­tin­ue to duel, groups ad­voc­at­ing for as­sault vic­tims con­tin­ue to push for Gil­librand’s pro­pos­al.

“We’re go­ing to be do­ing a lot of out­reach dur­ing the re­cess in in­di­vidu­al states, ad­dress­ing folks still un­de­cided,” said Greg Jac­ob, a policy dir­ect­or with the Ser­vice Wo­men’s Ac­tion Net­work and a former Mar­ine. “We saw tre­mend­ous suc­cess be­fore the ori­gin­ally sched­uled vote in Novem­ber with six ad­di­tion­al co­spon­sors com­ing in­to the fold after bring­ing sur­viv­ors and com­mand­ers in the field to the Hill.”

Vic­tim ad­voc­ates are also fo­cused on en­sur­ing the re­forms set to go in­to ef­fect un­der the de­fense au­thor­iz­a­tion le­gis­la­tion are im­ple­men­ted ap­pro­pri­ately by the Pentagon.

Un­der the re­forms, com­mand­ers lose the power to over­turn con­vic­tions, or to re­duce guilty find­ings to less­er of­fenses. Min­im­um sen­tences are es­tab­lished for ser­vice mem­bers found guilty of sexu­al as­saults.

Per­son­nel re­cords will in­clude sexu­al of­fenses and re­tali­ation will be­come a crime.

Sur­viv­ors of sexu­al at­tacks will be provided with spe­cial leg­al coun­sel, and will be al­lowed to ap­ply for per­man­ent trans­fers to oth­er units. A five-year stat­ute of lim­it­a­tions for rape and sexu­al as­sault in the mil­it­ary is thrown out. Vic­tims will no longer be al­lowed to be har­assed in pre­tri­al in­vest­ig­a­tions to de­term­ine wheth­er a sexu­al-as­sault case should pro­ceed.

With Demo­crats di­vided over fur­ther re­forms, Pres­id­ent Obama is tread­ing lightly — push­ing the Pentagon on the is­sue without choos­ing a side between Gil­librand and Mc­Caskill.

Obama is­sued a state­ment the day after the Sen­ate passed the sexu­al-as­sault re­forms in the de­fense bill, warn­ing the Pentagon, which is con­duct­ing a re­view due in a year, that ad­di­tion­al re­forms might be ne­ces­sary.

“Mem­bers of Con­gress, es­pe­cially Sen­at­ors Gil­librand and Mc­Caskill, have rightly called at­ten­tion to the ur­gency of erad­ic­at­ing this scourge from our armed forces,” Obama said in a press re­lease.

“If I do not see the kind of pro­gress I ex­pect, then we will con­sider ad­di­tion­al re­forms that may be re­quired to elim­in­ate this crime from our mil­it­ary ranks and pro­tect our brave ser­vice mem­bers who stand guard for us every day at home and around the world.”

What We're Following See More »
Clinton Camp Responds to FBI Director Comey’s Letter
3 hours ago
SCOTUS to Rule on Bathroom Rules for Trans Students
3 hours ago

The Supreme Court has announced that it will hear a case to determine whether the Obama administration has the right to mandate that all public schools allow students to use the bathroom which aligns with their gender identity. Schools districts have struggled with this topic "in the face of conflicting guidance from the courts, the federal government and, in some cases, state legislatures that have passed laws requiring people to use public restrooms that coincide with the sex on their birth certificates."

New Emails Discovered in Anthony Weiner Investigation
3 hours ago

The new emails related to Hillary Clinton, which FBI Director James Comey referenced in a Friday letter to Congress, came to light in the midst of an investigation of Anthony Weiner, former New York Congressman and estranged husband of Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Weiner is being investigated for allegedly sexting with an underage woman.

FBI To Investigate New Clinton Emails
5 hours ago
Trump Kicks in $10 Million of His Own Money
5 hours ago

Donald Trump "wired $10 million of his own money into his presidential campaign Friday morning," which "will be used to buy $25 million in new TV advertising in key battleground states." He's now put in a total of $66 million to his campaign.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.