Lawmakers Skeptical Obama Will Reform NSA After White House Summit

The president sat down with a small group of lawmakers Thursday to discuss NSA surveillance. What happens next is anyone’s guess.

Obama promised at his end-year press conference last month to have a "pretty definitive statment" on NSA surveillance reform in January.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Jan. 9, 2014, 9:12 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama met with hand-picked law­makers at the White House on Thursday to dis­cuss the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s con­tro­ver­sial spy­ing pro­grams, the main event of a week full of meet­ings at the White House fo­cus­ing on po­ten­tial re­forms for the ma­ligned fed­er­al agency.

The gath­er­ing in the Roosevelt Room oc­curred ahead of Obama’s planned an­nounce­ment of pos­sible NSA re­forms the ad­min­is­tra­tion hopes to push out be­fore his State of the Uni­on ad­dress at the end of the month. It in­cluded top de­fend­ers of NSA sur­veil­lance, such as Sen. Di­anne Fein­stein, D-Cal­if., as well as loud crit­ics, such as Rep. Jim Sensen­bren­ner, R-Wis.

At least some of the law­makers left the meet­ing un­con­vinced that the pres­id­ent is go­ing to do enough to cur­tail the NSA’s activ­it­ies. House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee Chair­man Bob Good­latte, R-Va., said “it’s in­creas­ingly clear that we need to take le­gis­lat­ive ac­tion to re­form” the NSA’s in­tel­li­gence gath­er­ing.

“If the pres­id­ent be­lieves we need a bulk col­lec­tion pro­gram of tele­phone data, then he needs to break his si­lence and clearly ex­plain to the Amer­ic­an people why it is needed for our na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” Good­latte said in a state­ment. “Amer­ic­ans’ civil liber­ties are at stake in this de­bate.”

Sensen­bren­ner, whose Free­dom Act would rein in the NSA’s do­mest­ic-sur­veil­lance powers, was even harsh­er.

“All three branches of gov­ern­ment have said the NSA has gone too far,” said Sensen­bren­ner, who also au­thored the post-9/11 Pat­ri­ot Act, from which the NSA de­rives much of its leg­al jus­ti­fic­a­tion for its data grabs. “Even Pres­id­ent Obama’s hand-picked pan­el agrees that bulk col­lec­tion by the NSA has come at a high cost to pri­vacy without im­prov­ing na­tion­al se­cur­ity. This prob­lem can­not be solved by pres­id­en­tial fi­at.”

Obama’s aides have re­peatedly said he is weigh­ing in­put from sev­er­al dif­fer­ent sources — in­clud­ing 46 re­com­mend­a­tions from his sur­veil­lance-re­view task force — and is still in the pro­cess of de­term­in­ing how to best al­ter the NSA’s data-col­lec­tion prac­tices without lim­it­ing their abil­ity to pro­tect na­tion­al se­cur­ity. What re­mains un­clear is wheth­er Obama con­vened Thursday’s meet­ing to so­li­cit more opin­ion from con­gres­sion­al lead­ers on the top­ic or to try to forge a co­ali­tion of sup­port for a pack­age of re­forms put on the table.

White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney told re­port­ers Wed­nes­day that Obama “wants to hear from [the law­makers] to dis­cuss with them the status of his re­view, which is on­go­ing.” Car­ney ad­ded that Obama is “at that stage still where he’s listen­ing and dis­cuss­ing with a vari­ety of stake­hold­ers [on] these is­sues.”

Thursday’s huddle with 16 law­makers from both cham­bers fol­lowed oth­ers at the White House earli­er in the week with con­gres­sion­al in­tel­li­gence staffers, some tech groups, and the Pri­vacy and Civil Liber­ties Over­sight Board.

Pri­vacy ad­voc­ates largely re­main skep­tic­al that any ac­tions Obama pro­poses will go far enough in en­sur­ing the NSA is free from po­ten­tial ab­uses, a view­point that many mem­bers of Con­gress share.

Obama sug­ges­ted at his year-end press con­fer­ence last month that some re­forms, par­tic­u­larly re­gard­ing trans­par­ency, needed to be made to re­store pub­lic con­fid­ence in the NSA, but stopped short of em­bra­cing any block­buster changes even after a D.C. Dis­trict Court judge de­rided the agency’s bulk data col­lec­tion as “al­most Or­wellian” and prob­ably un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. Obama’s pub­lic pos­tur­ing on NSA sur­veil­lance has re­mained vir­tu­ally un­changed since former agency con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden began leak­ing doc­u­ments about the scope of the pro­grams last June.

Also on Thursday, House In­tel­li­gence Com­mit­tee Chair­man Mike Ro­gers and rank­ing mem­ber Dutch Rup­pers­ber­ger, vo­cal back­ers of the NSA pro­grams, is­sued a state­ment cit­ing a new, top-secret Pentagon re­port pur­portedly re­veal­ing that Snowden’s leaks may “gravely im­pact” na­tion­al se­cur­ity. The re­port also finds that Snowden down­loaded about 1.7 mil­lion in­tel­li­gence files.

“This re­port con­firms my greatest fears — Snowden’s real acts of be­tray­al place Amer­ica’s mil­it­ary men and wo­men at great­er risk,” Ro­gers said in the state­ment. “Snowden’s ac­tions are likely to have leth­al con­sequences for our troops in the field.”

Ro­gers at­ten­ded Thursday’s meet­ing at the White House. Rup­pers­ber­ger, while in­vited, was un­able to at­tend.

An­oth­er meet­ing between White House coun­sel and civil-so­ci­ety or­gan­iz­a­tions was sched­uled for Thursday af­ter­noon. Some tech com­pan­ies are be­lieved to be meet­ing on Fri­day as well.

What We're Following See More »
Doesn’t Express Confidence in Marino
Trump to Declare Opioid Emergency Next Week
14 minutes ago
THE LATEST

After initially promising it in August, "President Trump said Monday that he will declare a national emergency next week to address the opioid epidemic." When asked, he also "declined to express confidence in Rep. Tom Marino (R-Pa.), his nominee for drug czar, in the wake of revelations that the lawmaker helped steer legislation making it harder to act against giant drug companies."

Source:
INTERVIEW THIS WEEK
Trump Still Considering Yellen For Fed
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Donald Trump plans to formally interview Janet Yellen this week about potentially staying on as Federal Reserve chair, two people familiar with the matter said...Many Republicans on Capitol Hill want Trump to move on from Yellen, whose first term ends in February, and choose a more traditionally conservative Fed chair."

Source:
NOMINEE FOR ONDCP
Trump Noncommittal on Marino
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS
IN LIGHT OF 60 MINUTES REVELATIONS
Manchin Asks Trump to Drop Marino’s Nomination for Drug Czar
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
WOULD OVERTURN MARINO LEGISLATION ON DRUG DISTRIBUTORS
McCaskill Will Introduce Bill in Response to “60 Minutes” Scoop
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In the wake of Sunday's blockbuster 60 Minutes/Washington Post report on opioid regulation and enforcement, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) has introduced legislation that "would repeal a 2016 law that hampered the Drug Enforcement Administration’s ability to regulate opioid distributors it suspects of misconduct." In a statement, McCaskill said: “Media reports indicate that this law has significantly affected the government’s ability to crack down on opioid distributors that are failing to meet their obligations and endangering our communities."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login