Boehner Urges Obama to Take ‘Active’ Role in Fighting Al-Qaida

But the House speaker stops short of calling for sending troops.

Speaker of the House John Boehner.
National Journal
Billy House
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Billy House
Jan. 9, 2014, 9:35 a.m.

Speak­er John Boehner on Thursday said it is time for Pres­id­ent Obama to take a “more act­ive role” in deal­ing with “the on­go­ing threat of al-Qaida in Ir­aq,” al­though he said he does not yet mean send­ing in Amer­ic­an troops.

“There are things that we can do to help the Ir­aqis that do not in­volve put­ting U.S. troops on the ground,” the Ohio Re­pub­lic­an said, in­clud­ing get­ting equip­ment to the Ir­aqis and provid­ing “oth­er ser­vices that will help them battle this coun­terter­ror­ism ef­fort that they are at­tempt­ing to do.”

Boehner does not typ­ic­ally speak out on mil­it­ary is­sues. However, he had been among those in­stru­ment­al in drum­ming up sup­port for the troop “surge” in 2007, and in bat­tling ef­forts to cut fund­ing and pre­vent those de­ploy­ments.

Shortly after be­gin­ning a news con­fer­ence, Boehner, un­promp­ted, told re­port­ers, “Pre­cious Amer­ic­an blood was spilled and na­tion­al treas­ure was ex­pen­ded help­ing the Ir­aqis re­move a bru­tal dic­tat­or and re­pelling ter­ror­ist ele­ments de­term­ined to stamp out hu­man free­dom and dig­nity.”

“That pro­gress is now threatened, and in the case of Fal­lu­jah, has been re­versed,” said Boehner, re­fer­ring to re­ports of Ir­aqi mil­it­ary be­ing de­feated by Qaida mil­it­ants.

Boehner went on to com­plain that Obama has del­eg­ated “his re­spons­ib­il­it­ies to the vice pres­id­ent,” and that “the ad­min­is­tra­tion has chosen to spend much of its time and en­ergy try­ing to ex­plain why hav­ing ter­ror­ists hold key ter­rain in the Middle East is not the pres­id­ent’s prob­lem.”

He said a Status of Forces agree­ment with Ir­aq should have been agreed to.

Pressed spe­cific­ally about wheth­er he is call­ing for troops to be sent, Boehner said there are oth­er things that can be done in­stead.

“One, I think the pres­id­ent ought to take a more act­ive role in deal­ing with the is­sues in Ir­aq.” He ad­ded, “Secondly, we need to get equip­ment to the Ir­aqis and oth­er ser­vices that will help them battle this coun­terter­ror­ism ef­fort that they are at­tempt­ing to do.”

“The United States has, and will con­tin­ue to have, vi­tal na­tion­al in­terests in Ir­aq,” Boehner said. “We must main­tain a long-term com­mit­ment to a suc­cess­ful out­come there. It’s time the pres­id­ent re­cog­nize this and get en­gaged.”

What We're Following See More »
UNLIKELY TO GET A VOTE, LIKELY TO ANGER GOP SENATORS
Obama Nominates Ambassador to Cuba
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
GOP REFUSED VOTE ON FCC COMMISIONER
Reid Blocks Tech Bill Over “Broken Promise”
3 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Monday night's debate may have inspired some in Congress, as Senate Minority Leader has decided to take a stand of his own. Reid is declining to allow a vote on a "bipartisan bill that would bolster U.S. spectrum availability and the deployment of wireless broadband." Why? Because of a "broken promise" made a year ago by Republicans, who have refused to vote on confirmation for a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Communications Commission to a second term. Harry Reid then took it a step further, invoking another confirmation vote still outstanding, that of Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland.

Source:
FLINT FUNDING STILL AT ISSUE
Spending Bill Fails to Clear 60-Vote Hurdle
5 hours ago
THE LATEST
SURPASSED 80 MILLION VIEWERS
Monday’s Debate Was Most Watched Ever
6 hours ago
DEBATE UPDATE
‘WASN’T PREPARED’
Hill Republicans Don’t Like What They See in Debate
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"It was obvious he wasn't prepared." “He only mentioned her email scandal once." "I think he took things a little too personal and missed a lot of opportunities to make very good debate points." That's just a smattering of the reactions of some elected Republicans to Donald Trump's debate performance.

Source:
×