‘Bizarre,’ ‘Perplexing’ December Jobs Report Stumps Economists

No one expected such a small uptick in jobs. So, what happened?

Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Labor Department officials testify during a hearing before the Joint Economic Committee January 10, 2014 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Catherine Hollander
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Catherine Hollander
Jan. 10, 2014, 7:45 a.m.

Eco­nom­ists de­ployed their ar­sen­al of syn­onyms for “weird” Fri­day in try­ing to de­scribe the Decem­ber jobs re­port, but the mes­sage was clear: What the heck happened?

Many ex­pec­ted payrolls to swell by around 200,000 jobs. So you could just feel the jaws drop­ping up and down Wall Street at 8:30 a.m. when the Bur­eau of Labor Stat­ist­ics re­por­ted a mea­ger gain of 74,000. Even the un­em­ploy­ment rate, which de­clined to a lower-than-ex­pec­ted 6.7 per­cent from 7 per­cent in Novem­ber, fell largely for the wrong reas­on — people leav­ing the work­force. “This is just one of the most un­usu­al re­ports, really, I’ve seen in quite a long time here,” said Douglas Hand­ler, chief U.S. eco­nom­ist at IHS Glob­al In­sight.

What happened? Why were the fore­casts so off the mark? Or will BLS change its num­bers when it re­vises them next month? We won’t really have a bet­ter sense un­til Feb. 7, when the agency re­leases its next em­ploy­ment re­port.

In the mean­time, eco­nom­ists have a few ideas:

  • Blame the weath­er. Some ex­cep­tion­ally bad weath­er last month might have dragged down con­struc­tion em­ploy­ment, which fell by 16,000 in Decem­ber, and brought over­all payroll num­bers down by between 50,000 and 75,000, Mor­gan Stan­ley eco­nom­ists es­tim­ate. BLS also cited “un­usu­ally cold weath­er” as a po­ten­tial cul­prit for a de­cline in con­tract­or em­ploy­ment. But the weath­er doesn’t ap­pear to ac­count for all of the weak­ness.
  • Things are not really get­ting bet­ter, faster for the labor mar­ket, and this is just evid­ence we were too op­tim­ist­ic in mak­ing our pre­dic­tions. The av­er­age job growth per month in 2013 (182,000) doesn’t look all that dif­fer­ent from 2012 (183,000) or 2011 (175,000). And labor force par­ti­cip­a­tion — a meas­ure of people who either have or are look­ing for jobs — con­tin­ued to de­cline last month, fall­ing by 0.2 per­cent­age points and off­set­ting an in­crease in Novem­ber. The weak­ness in the Decem­ber jobs re­port was pretty much across the board: There was not a lot of good news to be found, oth­er than the pos­sib­il­ity this was just a strange blip.
  • Things are really get­ting bet­ter for the labor mar­ket, and this is just noise. This the­ory says the num­bers are so out of line with Novem­ber’s gain of 241,000 jobs, and an over­all sol­id eco­nom­ic end to 2013, that it’s prob­ably just due to some strange sea­son­al-ad­just­ment factors (the way the gov­ern­ment smooths out its num­bers to ac­count for dif­fer­ent be­ha­vi­or in dif­fer­ent sea­sons) and weird weath­er. That com­bin­a­tion means this re­port really doesn’t say all that much: Stick to the three-month av­er­ages or longer for the real story. “There’s a les­son to be learned, I think, from the data that you don’t take the re­cov­ery for gran­ted, but I do think this is go­ing to be seen more as an ab­er­ra­tion than any­thing else,” said IHS’s Hand­ler.
What We're Following See More »
TO VISIT US TROOPS
John McCain Paid Secret Visit To Syria
35 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

Senator John McCain paid a secret visit to Northern Syria over the weekend during his trip abroad. McCain reportedly went "to speak with American officials and Kurdish fighters leading the charge to push ISIS militants out of Raqqa, the jihadist group’s stronghold." The trip was organized with the help of U.S. military.

Source:
‘MORE WITH LESS’
Trump Budget to Call for Major Cuts
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration will deliver its first budget to Congress in mid-March, and the president confirmed Wednesday it will contain major cuts for federal agencies." The blueprint, expected to be released in mid-March, will not include the kinds of specifics usually seen in White House budgets, but rather will instruct the heads of agencies to "do more with less."

Source:
DEFERENCE TO PRESIDENT
More Republicans Trust Trump than GOP Members
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
PAC WILL TARGET INCUMBENTS
Sanders Acolytes Taking the Movement Local
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"While Democrats nationwide have put the focus on President Trump, the Sanders wing of the party has engaged in an intramural fight to remake the party in a more populist, liberal mold." From Washington state to California to Florida, Sanders loyalists are making good on their promise to remake the party from the ground up. And just last week, a "group of former Sanders campaign aides launched a super PAC with the explicit goal of mounting primary challenges to Democratic incumbents."

Source:
THANKS TO MILITARY ROLE
McMaster Requires Congressional Approval
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Congress will need to vote on Donald Trump's pick of Lt. General H.R. McMaster to be his next national security adviser, but not for the reason you think. The position of NSA doesn't require Senate approval, but since McMaster currently holds a three-star military position, Congress will need to vote to allow him to keep his position instead of forcing him to drop one star and become a Major General, which could potentially affect his pension.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login