Omnibus Addresses Disabled Vets’ Pensions; Others Left Hanging

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 29: U.S. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) is trailed by reporters while arriving for a markup of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence October 29, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee is also researching allegations of surveillance related to allied heads of state by the National Security Administration.
National Journal
Elahe Izad and Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Elahe Izad Jordain Carney
Jan. 13, 2014, 4:22 p.m.

In a par­tial solu­tion to a nag­ging Pentagon prob­lem, dis­abled mil­it­ary vet­er­ans will have cuts to their pen­sions re­stored as part of the om­ni­bus spend­ing bill in­tro­duced Monday even­ing.

“We came up with the fix for the dis­ab­il­ity and the sur­viv­or part, which is a down pay­ment while they get ready to do com­pre­hens­ive re­form and get ready to do the pres­id­en­tial com­mis­sion,” Sen­ate Ap­pro­pri­ations Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Bar­bara Mikul­ski said ahead of the bill’s re­lease Monday. “So we made a down pay­ment for the needi­est, which were the dis­abled of work­ing age and the sur­viv­ors.”

Pen­sion changes that were made for oth­er vet­er­ans in last year’s budget agree­ment will be ad­dressed later this year by the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vices Com­mit­tee and oth­er pan­els.

The re­duc­tions to dis­abled vet­er­ans’ pen­sions were part of a lar­ger cut in­cluded in the budget deal reached by Sen­ate Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray and House Budget Chair­man Paul Ry­an last month. The pro­vi­sion would de­crease the an­nu­al cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment for work­ing-age mil­it­ary re­tir­ees by a total of 1 per­cent over 10 years.

The in­clu­sion of dis­abled vet­er­ans has drawn strong cri­ti­cism from vet­er­ans’ groups, mem­bers of Con­gress in both parties, and even De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel. Ry­an and Mur­ray quickly backed away from the in­clu­sion of vet­er­ans who re­tired for med­ic­al reas­ons, re­fer­ring to it as a mis­take.

The move to re­verse cuts for dis­abled mil­it­ary re­tir­ees as part of the om­ni­bus spend­ing bill ad­dresses less than a tenth of the ori­gin­al cut of ap­prox­im­ately $6 bil­lion. Sen. Jeff Ses­sions, R-Ala., es­tim­ated that a pro­vi­sion to elim­in­ate the COLA cuts for dis­abled vets, coupled with a re­versal of the de­crease in an­nu­it­ies for mil­it­ary sur­viv­ors, would cost ap­prox­im­ately $593 mil­lion.

“So you still have got the vast ma­jor­ity of people who served their coun­try, have been re­ceiv­ing pay­ments or ex­pect pay­ments, re­ceiv­ing quite a bit of re­duc­tions,” Ses­sions said.

Sen. Kelly Ayotte also spoke out Monday against a hand­ful of de­fense-re­lated cuts in the budget agree­ment, in­clud­ing the de­crease in the cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment for vet­er­ans who re­tired due to in­jury.

“The more I press the Pentagon for an­swers, the more I learn how egre­gious the mil­it­ary be­ne­fit cuts are in the budget deal,” the New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an said. “The cost-of-liv­ing ad­just­ment cuts un­fairly short­change mil­it­ary re­tir­ees, mil­it­ary sur­viv­ors, and the com­bat-in­jured to pay for more Wash­ing­ton spend­ing.”

Ayotte is one of a hand­ful of sen­at­ors seek­ing to link a re­peal of the mil­it­ary pen­sion cuts to a three-month ex­ten­sion of long-term un­em­ploy­ment in­sur­ance. The meas­ure would be paid for “with­in the budget win­dow,” Ayotte and oth­er sen­at­ors said in a joint re­lease.

Sen. Ro­ger Wick­er of Mis­sis­sippi, who led an ef­fort by Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors to at­tach an amend­ment re­vers­ing the cuts to the budget agree­ment but were ul­ti­mately un­suc­cess­ful, said the de­cision to re­verse the pen­sion cuts for dis­abled vet­er­ans would not keep him from vot­ing for the ap­pro­pri­ations bill.

“It may take a little steam out of our ef­fort, but I just think it is so un­fair to change the rules for vet­er­ans who have already com­pleted their part of the bar­gain that I think even­tu­ally some­time in the next year or so, get the whole thing cor­rec­ted,” Wick­er said.

Con­gress has plenty of op­tions for rolling back the ma­jor­ity of the cuts. Mem­bers have filed about a dozen bills in less than a month to re­store the COLA fund­ing in its en­tirety.

Some, in­clud­ing a pro­pos­al by Sens. Mark Pry­or, D-Ark., and Kay Hagan, D-N.C., push for an out­right re­peal of the cuts. Oth­ers, in­clud­ing Rep. Dan Maf­fei, D-N.Y., and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., are seek­ing to off­set fund­ing to re­verse the cuts by clos­ing a tax loop­hole used by off­shore cor­por­a­tions.

Gen. Ray Odi­erno, the chief of staff for the Army, said last week that he has “not thought about it be­ing linked to any­thing else,” when asked at the Na­tion­al Press Club about Rep. Dar­rell Issa’s pro­pos­al to tie the funds to changes in the postal sys­tem.

“It’s time for us to look at pay and com­pens­a­tion.”¦ I be­lieve if we con­tin­ue on the path that we’re on, that we’ll have to re­duce our end strength even more,” he ad­ded.

His com­ments are sim­il­ar to those made by Hagel and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair­man Mar­tin De­mp­sey, who both de­clined last month to say where the De­fense De­part­ment will re­com­mend cuts from their budget for the 2015 fisc­al year, or if that could in­clude com­pens­a­tion.

The two De­fense of­fi­cials backed the budget agree­ment, pit­ting them against vet­er­ans’ groups, in­clud­ing the Mil­it­ary Co­ali­tion and the Mil­it­ary Of­ficers As­so­ci­ation of Amer­ica, which con­tin­ue to lobby law­makers to re­store the full $6 bil­lion in cuts.

And sen­at­ors don’t ex­pect to let the is­sue go. Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, R-S.C., said mem­bers will push to re­peal the full cuts “un­til we get it fixed,” adding that he hopes a solu­tion will be found by the Novem­ber elec­tions.

But the is­sue could stretch bey­ond that. The Mil­it­ary Com­pens­a­tion and Re­tire­ment Mod­ern­iz­a­tion Com­mis­sion, which was sup­posed to have re­com­men­ded changes to the mil­it­ary’s com­pens­a­tion and re­tire­ment sys­tem by May, had its dead­line ex­ten­ded un­til Feb­ru­ary 2015. And the Sen­ate Armed Ser­vice Com­mit­tee plans to re­view all changes to mil­it­ary pen­sions be­fore the cuts go in­to ef­fect in Decem­ber 2015.

Sarah Mimms con­trib­uted

What We're Following See More »
AFTER THE VOTE FOR SPEAKER
Ryan: No Committee Assignments Until New Year
3 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

House Speaker Paul Ryan has decreed that House members "won’t receive their committee assignments until January — after they cast a public vote on the House floor for speaker. "The move has sparked behind-the-scenes grumbling from a handful of Ryan critics, who say the delay allows him and the Speaker-aligned Steering Committee to dole out committee assignments based on political loyalty rather than merit or expertise." The roll call to elect the speaker is set for Jan. 3, the first vote of the new Congress.

Source:
TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Statehood, Metro Come Up as Bowser Meets Trump
7 minutes ago
THE LATEST

DC Mayor Muriel Bowser met with Donald Trump this morning in Manhattan, with statehood and the Metro system on the agenda. “We talked about the things that are important to Washingtonians, and certainly becoming the 51st state is one of them," she said after the meeting. She also made the point that the District is “not dependent on the federal government for our funds," and brought up funding for Metro. She told reporters that Trump is a fan of D.C.

Source:
EVENT IN NC
Mattis Gets the Official Nod Tonight
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
LOWER COURT TO DETERMINE NEW DAMAGES
SCOTUS Sides with Samsung Over Apple
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A unanimous Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with smartphone maker Samsung in its high-profile patent dispute with Apple over design of the iPhone. The justices said Samsung may not be required to pay all the profits it earned from 11 phone models because the features at issue are only a tiny part of the devices. Apple had won a $399 million judgment against Samsung for copying parts of the iPhone's patented design, but the case now returns to a lower court to decide what Samsung must pay."

Source:
AFRAID OF BUDGET CUTS
Pentagon Hid Evidence of Waste
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login