White House Moves Obamacare Goalposts Again

Another day, another self-imposed standard gets watered down.

President Barack Obama speaks at Temple Emanu-El November 6, 2013 in Dallas, Texas.
National Journal
Sam Baker
Add to Briefcase
Sam Baker
Jan. 14, 2014, 5:10 p.m.

The White House is scal­ing back an­oth­er self-im­posed stand­ard for Obama­care’s suc­cess — and it’s one the ad­min­is­tra­tion has spent months pro­mot­ing.

White House of­fi­cials con­sist­ently — and ac­cur­ately — ar­gue that the most im­port­ant met­ric for Obama­care’s suc­cess this year is the mix of young and old en­rollees. But they’re back­ing away from their own goals for that mix.

Get­ting young people in­to the sys­tem is crit­ic­al to hold­ing down premi­ums, and there­fore to keep­ing each state’s in­sur­ance mar­ket stable. Ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials pre­vi­ously said their tar­get was for young adults to make up about 38 per­cent of Obama­care en­rollees. Now that stand­ard is down to about 30 per­cent. Or maybe even 24 per­cent — where the mix stands now.

It was the White House that set the ini­tial tar­get of 38 per­cent en­roll­ment for young adults. But of­fi­cials wouldn’t stand by that fig­ure this week.

The Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment re­leased its first age break­down on Monday, show­ing that about 24 per­cent of Obama­care en­rollees are between 18 and 34. Of­fi­cials from HHS and the White House her­al­ded the fig­ure as a suc­cess be­cause it makes an in­sur­ance “death spir­al” — Obama­care’s worst-case scen­ario — ap­pear all but im­possible.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion may well hit its ini­tial 38 per­cent tar­get, but it’s ap­par­ently abandon­ing that goal pree­mpt­ively, de­clar­ing suc­cess just by avoid­ing the worst pos­sible out­come.

“We are already at that stage of pre­lim­in­ary sus­tain­ab­il­ity with three months left to go,” an ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said.

The thing is, that’s prob­ably true. Young-adult en­roll­ment looks OK. It was nev­er ex­pec­ted to hit its fi­nal tar­get at this stage; young people will likely sign up at the last minute, and the fi­nal dead­line to en­roll isn’t un­til March.

Pro­jec­tions from the Kais­er Fam­ily Found­a­tion show that the health care law’s new in­sur­ance mar­kets could be vi­able with young-adult en­roll­ment as low as 25 per­cent — the bar the White House has already cleared. When Mas­sachu­setts im­ple­men­ted the first draft of Obama­care in 2006, its mar­ket­place proved sus­tain­able with 30 per­cent en­roll­ment among young adults.

But, once again, ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials are lower­ing their own stand­ards for suc­cess — ditch­ing tar­gets they set or em­braced, and re­de­fin­ing suc­cess as any­thing that’s good enough to avoid a total col­lapse. It was the White House that set the ini­tial tar­get of 38 per­cent en­roll­ment for young adults. But of­fi­cials wouldn’t stand by that fig­ure this week.

“There’s a dif­fer­ence between that num­ber and what’s re­quired for a sus­tain­able mar­ket,” the seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial said.

The White House has already dis­avowed its self-iden­ti­fied “tar­get” for over­all en­roll­ment: 7 mil­lion people in the first year. In down­play­ing that num­ber, the White House and HHS have ar­gued that the age mix is more im­port­ant than over­all en­roll­ment — which it is, from a policy per­spect­ive.

But just as of­fi­cials haven’t re­leased a new tar­get for over­all en­roll­ment, they’re also lower­ing ex­pect­a­tions for the mix of old and young en­rollees. The White House said Monday that it had cleared the first bar — a good enough mix for a sus­tain­able mar­ket. Is there an­oth­er goal, more am­bi­tious than avoid­ing dis­aster?

“From now on, the ul­ti­mate goal is to get as many people in­sured as pos­sible,” the ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial told re­port­ers.

HHS of­fi­cials also would not com­mit to the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s earli­er goals for young-adult en­roll­ment. The num­ber had been “over­blown” as a make-or-break fig­ure, one HHS of­fi­cial said.

A mix that’s good enough to avoid a “death spir­al” could still af­fect in­sur­ance premi­ums next year. The sick­er the over­all mar­ket­place is, the more premi­ums are likely to rise.

(In this con­text, “young people” are a proxy for “healthy people.” Health status is what af­fects premi­ums, not age. But be­cause in­surers are no longer al­lowed to vary their premi­ums based on preex­ist­ing con­di­tions, the ap­plic­a­tion for cov­er­age doesn’t ask about health prob­lems. Young people are pre­sumed to be health­i­er on av­er­age, and that’s why they’re so highly coveted.)

A mix of roughly 25 per­cent young adults would cause in­surers to raise their premi­ums, Kais­er pre­dicted, but not enough to cause a “death spir­al.” Kais­er said the new in­sur­ance mar­ket­places would re­main vi­able even in that “worst-case scen­ario,” al­though premi­ums would be less likely to rise with more young people in the mix.

In­surers are already con­cerned, however, that this year’s en­roll­ment pool might not be as healthy as they pro­jec­ted. The tech­nic­al prob­lems with Health­Care.gov de­pressed over­all en­roll­ment, and ex­ec­ut­ives from Hu­mana have also said Pres­id­ent Obama’s de­cision to help un-can­cel cer­tain in­sur­ance policies has also kept healthy people out of the mar­ket.

What We're Following See More »
Johnson on Ballot Everywhere, Followed by Stein, McMullin
1 hours ago
Is McMullin Building the GOP in Exile?
2 hours ago

Evan McMullin, the independent conservative candidate who may win his home state of Utah, is quietly planning to turn his candidacy into a broader movement for principled conservatism. He tells BuzzFeed he's "skeptical" that the Republican party can reform itself "within a generation" and that the party's internal "disease" can't be cured via "the existing infrastructure.” The ex-CIA employee and Capitol Hill staffer says, “I have seen and worked with a lot of very courageous people in my time [but] I have seen a remarkable display of cowardice over the last couple of months in our leaders.” McMullin's team has assembled organizations in the 11 states where he's on the ballot, and adviser Rick Wilson says "there’s actually a very vibrant market for our message in the urban northeast and in parts of the south."

Clinton Up 9 in USA Today Poll; Up 3 According to Fox
3 hours ago

A new USA Today/Suffolk University poll finds Clinton leads Trump by 9 points nationwide, 47% to 38%. A Fox News national poll has Clinton up just three points, 44% to 41% over Trump.

Too Many Potential Enrollees Paying Obamacare Penalties Instead
4 hours ago

One of the main reasons for the recent Obamacare premium hikes is that many potential enrollees have simply decided to pay the tax penalty for remaining uninsured, rather than pay for insurance. More than 8 million people paid the penalty in 2014, and preliminary numbers for 2015 suggest that the number approaches 6 million. "For the young and healthy who are badly needed to make the exchanges work, it is sometimes cheaper to pay the Internal Revenue Service than an insurance company charging large premiums, with huge deductibles."

Cruz: Eight Justices Could Be an Ongoing Situation
5 hours ago

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said that "there was “precedent” for a Supreme Court with fewer than nine justices—appearing to suggest that the blockade on nominee Merrick Garland could last past the election." Speaking to reporters in Colorado, Cruz said: "I would note, just recently, that Justice Breyer observed that the vacancy is not impacting the ability of the court to do its job. That’s a debate that we are going to have.”


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.