Why the Spending Bill Would Ban Official Portraits

Federal officials have a history of commissioning expensive oil paintings for tens of thousands of dollars.

The official portrait of President George W. Bush was unveiled in 2012. A section in the 2014 spending bill would prohibit the federal government from paying for portraits of employees, including the president.
National Journal
Jack Fitzpatrick
Add to Briefcase
Jack Fitzpatrick
Jan. 15, 2014, 7:29 a.m.

Fisc­al con­ser­vat­ives didn’t get everything they wanted in the 2014 spend­ing bill, but they did win the battle over oil paint­ings.

It might be mean­ing­less in the con­text of the $1.1 tril­lion om­ni­bus bill re­vealed Tues­day, but one sec­tion of the bill would save money by ban­ning the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment from pay­ing for paint­ings of the pres­id­ent, vice pres­id­ent, mem­bers of Con­gress, or oth­er of­fi­cials.

Those sav­ings might be small com­pared with is­sues re­lat­ing to the Af­ford­able Care Act or the de­fense budget, but Cab­in­et heads have man­aged to spend a sur­pris­ing amount on paint­ings in the past.

The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment spent $180,000 on of­fi­cial por­traits in 2012, ac­cord­ing to a Novem­ber 2012 re­view by The Wash­ing­ton Times. The En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency spent nearly $40,000 on a por­trait of then-Ad­min­is­trat­or Lisa Jack­son; the Air Force spent $41,200 on a por­trait of then-Sec­ret­ary Mi­chael Don­ley; and the Ag­ri­cul­ture De­part­ment spent $22,500 on a por­trait of Sec­ret­ary Tom Vil­sack, ac­cord­ing to The Times in­vest­ig­a­tion. Be­fore Jack­son’s por­trait, the EPA spent about $30,000 on a por­trait of then-Sec­ret­ary Steph­en John­son, the news­pa­per said.

And The Wash­ing­ton Post found in 2008 that most por­trait con­tracts are awar­ded with no com­pet­it­ive bid­ding.

Ex­pens­ive por­traits drew op­pos­i­tion be­fore the is­sue found its way in­to the spend­ing bill. In April, Rep. Bill Cas­sidy, R-La., in­tro­duced the Elim­in­at­ing Gov­ern­ment-fun­ded Oil paint­ing (EGO) Act, which also would have pro­hib­ited fed­er­ally fun­ded por­traits of cer­tain of­fi­cials.

It’s worth elim­in­at­ing those costs even if it doesn’t make a no­tice­able dent in the budget, said Steve El­lis, spokes­man for the watch­dog group Tax­pay­ers for Com­mon Sense.

“At least it’s show­ing a nod to some level of fisc­al re­spons­ib­il­ity while we waste mil­lions and bil­lions else­where,” El­lis said.

Por­traits of the pres­id­ent, vice pres­id­ent, and oth­er ma­jor polit­ic­al fig­ures are un­der­stand­able, but a nicely framed pho­to­graph should be enough for less in­flu­en­tial of­fi­cials, El­lis said.

And some fed­er­ally fun­ded por­traits are loc­ated in se­cure areas of of­fice build­ings, off-lim­its to the pub­lic, adding to El­lis’s be­lief that tax­pay­ers should not pay for them.

As di­git­al cam­er­as be­come cheap­er and even the pres­id­ent uses a phone to take selfies, the pur­pose of painted por­traits has changed. Rather than simply doc­u­ment­ing lead­ers of ex­ec­ut­ive agen­cies, El­lis said they have be­come a lav­ish perk.

“There are very few people who could af­ford to pay for a por­trait at all,” El­lis said, “and times have changed.”

What We're Following See More »
SAYS TRUMP JUST ATTACKING REPUBLICANS
Former Top Aide to McConnell Says GOPers Should Abandon Trump
2 days ago
THE LATEST
“YOU CAN’T CHANGE HISTORY, BUT YOU CAN LEARN FROM IT”
Trump Defends Confederate Statues in Tweetstorm
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE
CEOS HAVE BEEN FLEEING FOR THE EXITS
Trump to End Business Councils
3 days ago
THE LATEST
FROM STATEMENT
McConnell: “No Good Neo-Nazis”
3 days ago
THE LATEST
NO FORMAL LEGISLATIVE EFFORT
CBC Members Call for Removal of Confederate Statues from Capitol
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"Members of the Congressional Black Caucus are reviving calls to remove Confederate statues from the Capitol following the violence at a white nationalist rally in Virginia." Rep. Cedric Richmond, the group's chair, told ABC News that "we will never solve America's race problem if we continue to honor traitors who fought against the United States." And Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson said, “Confederate memorabilia have no place in this country and especially not in the United States Capitol." But a CBC spokesperson said no formal legislative effort is afoot.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login