Another Democratic senator has come out publicly against a proposed set of new sanctions against Iran. This time, it’s Sen. Martin Heinrich of New Mexico.
Heinrich, who cosponsored sanctions legislation in the past, won’t sign on to an Iranian sanctions bill by Sens. Robert Menendez and Mark Kirk, according to his office. Like the White House, Heinrich wants to hold off on new sanctions while international negotiators work toward a comprehensive agreement with Iran over its nuclear program.
“The U.S. intelligence community has made clear that ‘new sanctions would undermine the prospects for a successful comprehensive nuclear agreement with Iran.’ I remain firmly committed to ensuring that Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon and to exhausting every option before resorting to military force,” Heinrich said in a statement. “The interim agreement made on Nov. 24, 2013 is such an option.”
The sanctions legislation has 59 cosponsors, including 16 Democratic backers. Kirk, an Illinois Republican, has said he believes there are more than 70 votes for the legislation, if Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid brings it to the floor for a vote. The White House has issued a veto threat. This week, other previously mum Democrats, such as Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, have publicly backed the White House position.
Heinrich said that, despite the interim deal with Iran, which begins next week and starts a six-month clock toward a final deal, “Iran must show that it is serious and that it will abide by the commitments made to the international community. Should it violate the terms of the agreement, I stand ready to support the sanctions outlined” in the pending sanctions bill.
In 2011, Iranian-sanctions legislation passed the Senate 100-0.
What We're Following See More »
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."
"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."
"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.
The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."