The GOP’s Risky Rebuff to Long-Term Unemployed

The people losing benefits are a truly national phenomenon, cutting across all age groups, races, and political preferences. Beware the ballot backlash.

A group of demonstrators hold up signs before a markup hearing of the Senate Finance Committee October 11, 2011.
National Journal
Michael Hirsh
Add to Briefcase
Michael Hirsh
Jan. 16, 2014, 10:48 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans who are play­ing polit­ics with long-term un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits in the mid­winter of a re­cord-slow re­cov­ery are en­gaged in a very dan­ger­ous game, es­pe­cially if they think they’re up to their usu­al tac­tic of pleas­ing their base by root­ing out waste­ful “wel­fare queens” and the like.

That’s be­cause today’s long-term un­em­ployed make up a sub­stan­tial part of the Re­pub­lic­an Party’s base. Eco­nom­ists say it’s false to sug­gest that most of those who’ve been out of work for six months or more are urb­an ne’er-do-wells look­ing for handouts, and that the be­ne­fits they re­ceive only in­duce them to stay on the dole. On the con­trary: The data show that today’s long-term un­em­ployed, more than in the past, cut across every age, ra­cial, eth­nic, and edu­ca­tion­al group and are mainly suf­fer­ing from a slow-growth eco­nomy that simply is not provid­ing enough jobs for those eager and ready to take them.

And if they are made to suf­fer even more from an eco­nom­ic phe­nomen­on that is not of their own mak­ing, they’re very likely to take out their an­ger polit­ic­ally on those re­spons­ible. “The Great Re­ces­sion pulled in groups that were not highly rep­res­en­ted among the long-term un­em­ployed be­fore,” in­clud­ing far more whites and edu­cated people than in the past, says Josh Mitchell, a re­search­er with the Urb­an In­sti­tute, a Wash­ing­ton-based think tank, and au­thor of the 2013 re­port “Who Are the Long-Term Un­em­ployed?”

For some Re­pub­lic­an le­gis­lat­ors, the rhet­or­ic be­ing used against long-term un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits echoes the kinds of things they have been say­ing against Obama­care and the ex­ten­sion of Medi­caid and food stamps, sug­gest­ing a new kind of class war­fare

But that may be a tac­tic­al mis­take. It is true that Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans, a main­stay of the Demo­crat­ic Party’s base, make up a some­what dis­pro­por­tion­ately large per­cent­age of the long-term un­em­ployed. But that per­cent­age is drop­ping as the ef­fects of the Great Re­ces­sion linger on in a slow-growth era when com­pan­ies are still stingy about hir­ing, and it be­comes more and more dif­fi­cult for even edu­cated, re­l­at­ively skilled people to avoid the stigma of long-term un­em­ploy­ment. Where­as Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans made up 27 per­cent of the long-term un­em­ployed in 2007, now they are just 22.6 per­cent of the total. By con­trast, His­pan­ics — a much-sought-after GOP demo­graph­ic — make up a great­er share today (19.0 per­cent now versus 14.1 per­cent in 2007). And while long-term-un­em­ployed work­ers tend to be less edu­cated than em­ployed work­ers, they are ac­tu­ally some­what more edu­cated than newly un­em­ployed and “dis­cour­aged” work­ers — an­oth­er data point sug­gest­ing that far more of them are part of the GOP base than one might think.

The long-term un­em­ployed are also more likely now to live the GOP’s geo­graph­ic strong­holds. They now make up 26.8 per­cent of the total in the West (versus 19.9 per­cent in 2007), and they are slightly more likely to live in the South (34.8 per­cent now versus 31.7 per­cent in 2007) in­stead of in the Mid­w­est (18.9 per­cent now versus 29.1 per­cent in 2007).

Fi­nally, be­cause eco­nom­ic stud­ies show that the con­di­tion of long-term un­em­ploy­ment can last in­to the next gen­er­a­tion, af­fect­ing the edu­ca­tion and job pro­spects of the chil­dren of today’s suf­fer­ers, the polit­ic­al ef­fects could en­dure as well.

With the eco­nomy op­er­at­ing at such high un­em­ploy­ment, eco­nom­ists say it’s much less likely that ex­ten­ded un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits will pro­long job­less­ness; on the con­trary, as long as they are get­ting be­ne­fits, today’s long-term un­em­ployed are more likely to keep search­ing for jobs than drop­ping out of the work­force en­tirely. Un­der these con­di­tions it’s also much more likely that a re­new­al of be­ne­fits will stim­u­late the eco­nomy by pro­mot­ing more spend­ing.

While the num­ber has de­clined with the over­all job­less rate over the last two years, the num­ber of long-term un­em­ployed is still at his­tor­ic highs of 3.9 mil­lion, ac­count­ing for 37.7 per­cent of the total un­em­ployed work­ers. Nearly 6 mil­lion more work­ers have dropped out of the labor mar­ket en­tirely. 

About 1.3 mil­lion job­less work­ers who had been re­ceiv­ing about $256 weekly in emer­gency un­em­ploy­ment be­ne­fits have gone nearly three weeks without aid since they were cut off at the end of Decem­ber. And while Re­pub­lic­ans and Demo­crats have achieved re­l­at­ive amity on an over­all spend­ing bill, they re­main ideo­lo­gic­ally dead­locked over the be­ne­fits ques­tion. Des­pite the ef­forts of their col­league Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada — which has the highest un­em­ploy­ment rate in the na­tion — Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans have blocked le­gis­lat­ive ef­forts at even a three-month ex­ten­sion of be­ne­fits, say­ing they need to see cuts else­where in the budget to pay for them. 

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
2 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
2 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
3 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login