Republicans Quietly Talk About Skipping Next Budget

After the Ryan-Murray deal set spending limits for the year, House Republicans question whether they need to produce a budget.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), Chairman of the House Budget Committee, presents his budget plan during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on March 12, 2013 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Billy House and Tim Alberta
Add to Briefcase
Billy House Tim Alberta
Jan. 16, 2014, 12:05 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans are quietly dis­cuss­ing the op­tion of not writ­ing a budget in 2014, a man­euver that would free up time on the le­gis­lat­ive cal­en­dar and pro­tect GOP law­makers from a po­ten­tially dam­aging vote in an elec­tion year.

The idea of Re­pub­lic­ans skip­ping this year’s budget­ary pro­cess seems odd when con­sid­er­ing the House GOP made his­tory last year by at­tach­ing a policy rider called “No Budget, No Pay” to a debt-lim­it ex­ten­sion. That meas­ure tied law­makers’ salar­ies to budgets be­ing writ­ten in both cham­bers and paved the way for a budget agree­ment between House Budget Com­mit­tee Chair­man Paul Ry­an and Sen­ate Budget Chair­wo­man Patty Mur­ray.

But un­be­knownst to some law­makers at the time — and still some today — is that “No Budget, No Pay” was a one-year pro­vi­sion. It is now ex­pired. This, com­bined with the fact that Ry­an-Mur­ray set spend­ing fig­ures for the next fisc­al year any­how, has some House Re­pub­lic­ans won­der­ing if a budget­ing pro­cess this year is really ne­ces­sary.

“There are folks in the Re­pub­lic­an Con­fer­ence who don’t want to pass a budget this year,” said Rep. Mick Mul­vaney of South Car­o­lina, who dis­ap­proves of the idea. Asked to ex­plain his col­leagues’ reas­on­ing, Mul­vaney mim­icked: “We’ve already got a 302A num­ber; why do we need a budget? Ry­an-Mur­ray set a num­ber; why would we need to have a budget?”

A seni­or House GOP lead­er­ship aide con­firmed there is a push com­ing from “polit­ic­al types” for House Re­pub­lic­ans not to get en­gaged with a budget this year for fisc­al 2015.

“Yes, there’s been some of that,” the aide said. The staffer iden­ti­fied some of those in­stig­at­ing such talk as people at the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Cam­paign Com­mit­tee. But he said he be­lieved it is not get­ting much “trac­tion” among House GOP lead­ers or mem­bers.

When pressed about such talk, NR­CC Chair­man Greg Walden dis­missed it, say­ing he be­lieves the House GOP will do a budget this spring. “I think we’re fully headed in the dir­ec­tion of do­ing a budget. I think it’s re­quired by law,” Walden said.

John Boehner’s spokes­man, Mi­chael Steel, agreed: “House Re­pub­lic­ans in­tend to pass a budget this year.”

It makes sense for GOP cam­paign op­er­at­ives to make such a push, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al GOP law­makers who asked not to be quoted on the sub­ject. The pre­vi­ous Re­pub­lic­an budgets passed by Ry­an’s com­mit­tee and ad­op­ted by the House have been so ideo­lo­gic­ally charged, they ex­plained, that some Re­pub­lic­ans think it’s time — es­pe­cially in an elec­tion year — to avoid any po­lar­iz­ing votes that would hand am­muni­tion to the Demo­crats.

But such a pass­ive ap­proach won’t fly with con­ser­vat­ives in the GOP con­fer­ence. As with health care re­form, pri­vacy le­gis­la­tion, and tax re­form, the hard-liners in the party are ur­ging House lead­er­ship to ad­opt their “bold” ideas — not just on pa­per, but on the House floor.

“It’s one thing to say we’re for this; it’s an­oth­er thing to say we’re for this so much we’re will­ing to take a vote on it, and de­bate it, and take the ar­rows that the oth­er side is go­ing to sling at us,” said Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio. “I think that’s im­port­ant in an elec­tion year.”

The con­gres­sion­al timetable sets April 15 as the dead­line for com­plet­ing ac­tion on the an­nu­al budget res­ol­u­tion.

Sen­ate Demo­crats have not in­dic­ated wheth­er they plan to write an­oth­er budget this year, and Mur­ray’s of­fice de­clined to shed light on the sub­ject when asked about the chair­wo­man’s plans.

Ry­an spokes­man Wil­li­am Al­lis­on said, “We don’t have any an­nounce­ments to make at this time.” But he ad­ded, “It is Chair­man Ry­an’s in­tent to again put for­ward a bal­anced budget.”

Rep. Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, co­chair of the “Tues­day Group” of mod­er­ate Re­pub­lic­ans, said he doubted any such “no-budget” man­euver was ser­i­ously be­ing con­sidered in the House. At the same time, Dent and oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans sug­ges­ted that ig­nor­ing the budget pro­cess one year after “No Budget, No Pay” could ap­pear blatantly hy­po­crit­ic­al.

Rep. James Lank­ford, the Re­pub­lic­an Policy Com­mit­tee chair­man and a mem­ber of GOP lead­er­ship, said mem­bers have been ap­proach­ing him re­cently to ask if, in fact, they can get away without do­ing a budget this year.

“Yes, there is still stat­utory re­spons­ib­il­ity to do a budget,” Lank­ford said. “Now, if a budget is not done, it’s true that a budget num­ber is deemed…. That num­ber is set. But the ar­gu­ment’s not about the budget it­self; the ar­gu­ment’s really about a vis­ion. How do we fix the long term de­fi­cit? You’re not resolv­ing that without a budget.”

What We're Following See More »
Come January Sanders Could Oppose Clinton from the Left
58 minutes ago

"Sen. Bernie Sanders, a loyal soldier for Hillary Clinton since he conceded the Democratic presidential nomination in July, plans to push liberal legislation with like-minded senators with or without Clinton’s support if she is elected— and to aggressively oppose appointments that do not pass muster with the party’s left wing." Sanders and other similarly inclined senators are already "plotting legislation" on climate change, prison reform, the minimum wage, and tuition-free college.

McAuliffe Donated to FBI Official’s Wife
1 hours ago

"The political organization of Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, an influential Democrat with longstanding ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave nearly $500,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an official at the Federal Bureau of Investigation who later helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s email use."

Curt Schilling to Launch Breitbart Radio Show
1 hours ago

Baseball great Curt Schilling says he still needs to clear a challenge to Sen. Elizabeth Warren with his wife, but in the meantime, he's found something to occupy him: the former hurler is going to host a daily online radio show on "The show marks Schilling’s return to media six months after ESPN fired him for sharing an anti-transgender Facebook post."

The New Yorker Endorses Clinton
2 hours ago

The New Yorker has endorsed Hillary Clinton, saying that "barring some astonishment," she will become the next president. Calling Clinton "distinctly capable," the magazine excoriates Donald Trump as a candidate who "favors conspiracy theory and fantasy, deriving his knowledge from the darker recesses of the Internet and 'the shows.'" Additionally, the historical nature of the possibility of "send[ing] a woman to the White House" is not lost on the editors, who note the possibility more than once in the endorsement.

AT&T Seeks to Buy Time Warner
2 hours ago

AT&T agreed to a deal on Saturday to buy Time Warner Inc. for a reported $85.4 billion, a merger that would turn AT&T into a media giant. The two companies announced that they hope to have the deal closed by the end of 2017. However, the completion of the deal will likely not be smooth sailing, as the deal faces potential backlash from antitrust workers, as well as lawmakers. Following the merger's announcement, multiple lawmakers raised skepticism and said they plan to scrutinize the deal further, with Minn. Sen. Amy Klobuchar calling for a hearing.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.