Iran Hawks Flounder Against Reid-Obama Coalition

US President Barack Obama(R) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, arrive for a meeting with the Senate Democratic Caucus on July 31, 2013 in the US Capitol in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Jan. 16, 2014, 3:23 p.m.

Sen­ate Ir­an hawks have lots of votes to back their sanc­tions le­gis­la­tion. What they lack is a plan to get the bill to the floor.

Fifty-nine sen­at­ors — in­clud­ing 16 Demo­crats — have signed onto sanc­tions le­gis­la­tion from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Robert Men­en­dez and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mark Kirk. The meas­ure would pun­ish Ir­an with sanc­tions if it reneges on an in­ter­im nuc­le­ar agree­ment or if that agree­ment does not ul­ti­mately ab­ol­ish any nuc­le­ar-weapons cap­ab­il­it­ies for Ir­an.

That count has climbed rap­idly since the bi­par­tis­an pair in­tro­duced their le­gis­la­tion in late Decem­ber. But now it’s un­clear wheth­er that sup­port will be enough to clear the bill’s next ma­jor hurdle: Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id.

Re­id is sid­ing with the White House, which has put in­tense pres­sure on law­makers not to act on sanc­tions, ar­guing it could res­ult in both a nuc­le­ar-armed and hos­tile Ir­a­ni­an state. And without Re­id’s back­ing, sup­port­ers of the Men­en­dez-Kirk bill are un­sure how to move the meas­ure to the floor.

“I as­sume that if the Demo­crat sen­at­ors put enough pres­sure on Sen­at­or Re­id he might bring it to the floor,” said Mis­souri Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Roy Blunt. “But, you know, we are at a mo­ment in the Sen­ate where noth­ing hap­pens that Sen­at­or Re­id doesn’t want to hap­pen; and this is something at this mo­ment that Sen­at­or Re­id doesn’t want to hap­pen.”

And for now, sanc­tions sup­port­ers are still mulling their strategy.

“We are talk­ing amongst ourselves. There is a very act­ive de­bate and dis­cus­sion on­go­ing about how best to move for­ward,” said Demo­crat­ic Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al of Con­necti­c­ut, a co­spon­sor of the bill. “There are a num­ber of al­tern­at­ive strategies, but we’re de­lib­er­at­ing them.”

While Re­id has, at least for now, foiled their policy plans, sanc­tions sup­port­ers are still scor­ing the de­sired polit­ic­al points on the is­sue. They can re­port their ef­forts to their con­stitu­ents while blam­ing Re­id for the in­ac­tion.

But whatever pres­sure Re­id is get­ting from his col­leagues, he’s also get­ting sup­port from the com­mand­er in chief.

In a White House meet­ing Wed­nes­day night, Pres­id­ent Obama made a hard sell to Demo­crats on the is­sue, plead­ing with them to back off sanc­tions while his team worked on a nuc­le­ar pact.

“The pres­id­ent did speak pas­sion­ately about how [we] must seize this op­por­tun­ity, that we need to seize this six months “¦ and that if Ir­an isn’t will­ing to in the end make the de­cisions ne­ces­sary to make it work, he’ll be ready to sign a bill to tight­en those sanc­tions — but we gotta give this six months,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley of Ore­gon, after re­turn­ing from the White House.

In the mean­time, many bill sup­port­ers reas­on that Re­id will even­tu­ally feel the heat.

“We’ll just have to ratchet up the pres­sure, that’s all,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Mc­Cain. “The pres­id­ent is push­ing back, ob­vi­ously, and he’s ap­peal­ing to the loy­alty of Demo­crats, but there are a lot of oth­er forces out there that are push­ing in the oth­er dir­ec­tion, so we’ll see how they re­act.”

Earli­er this week Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, R-S.C., said he was hop­ing to find more Demo­crat­ic co­spon­sors over the re­cess and was talk­ing to House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor about wheth­er the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House might take up the Sen­ate sanc­tions bill as a way to spur the Sen­ate to act. But neither of Gra­ham’s ap­proaches rep­res­ents a broad, co­ordin­ated cam­paign.

Demo­crats, who have more power to drive the train in the Sen­ate, seem to be in little hurry.

“I don’t think there is any time sched­ule re­lated to it at this point,” said Demo­crat­ic co­spon­sor Ben Cardin of Mary­land. “We are all try­ing to fig­ure out how we can be most help­ful and make sure Ir­an does not be­come a nuc­le­ar-weapon state.”

Men­en­dez, the New Jer­sey Demo­crat who chairs the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee and is the lead Demo­crat­ic spon­sor, said he is fo­cused on hear­ing more from the ad­min­is­tra­tion about the re­por­ted un­of­fi­cial secret “side deal” with Tehran.

About the plans to pro­ceed, Men­en­dez said non­com­mit­tally, “We’ll see.”

Kirk, the Illinois Re­pub­lic­an who is the oth­er lead spon­sor, said he was count­ing on elec­tions pres­sure to spark ac­tion.

“My hope is that, as we get to­wards midterm elec­tions, mem­bers are go­ing to want to be on re­cord be­ing against giv­ing up bil­lions of dol­lars to Ir­an,” Kirk said.

Oth­er mem­bers are hop­ing lob­by­ing groups can carry the weight on this one. Mc­Cain said he hoped pro-Is­rael groups could con­vince Demo­crats to spring in­to ac­tion or that sup­port­ers could make it un­com­fort­able for Re­id to con­tin­ue block­ing the bill.

“We’ll see what hap­pens — wheth­er the pres­sure builds, how act­ive some of these con­stitu­en­cies are, par­tic­u­larly in states with large pro-Is­rael pop­u­la­tions,” Mc­Cain said. “And we may just start bring­ing it up and say­ing, ‘We ask un­an­im­ous con­sent that we bring it up,’ and make Sen­at­or Re­id ob­ject.”

Michael Catalin contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
Clinton Foundation Staffers Steered Biz to Bill
3 hours ago

"Two chief fundraisers for the Clinton Foundation pressed corporate donors to steer business opportunities to former President Bill Clinton as well, according to a hacked memo published Wednesday by WikiLeaks. The November 2011 memo from Douglas Band, at the time a top aide to Mr. Clinton, outlines extensive fundraising efforts that Mr. Band and a partner deployed on behalf of the Clinton Foundation and how that work sometimes translated into large speaking fees and other paid work for Mr. Clinton."

Chef Jose Andres Campaigns With Clinton
11 hours ago
House Investigators Already Sharpening Their Spears for Clinton
12 hours ago

House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz plans to spend "years, come January, probing the record of a President Hillary Clinton." Chaffetz told the Washington Post: “It’s a target-rich environment. Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up. She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good.”

Clinton Super PAC Enters the House Fray
17 hours ago

Priorities USA, the super PAC aligned with the Clinton campaign, which has already gotten involved in two Senate races, is now expanding into House races. The group released a 30 second spot which serves to hit Donald Trump and Iowa Rep. Rod Blum, who is in a tough race to win re-election in Iowa's first congressional district. The super PAC's expansion into House and Senate races shows a high level of confidence in Clinton's standing against Trump.

House to Vote on Iran Sanctions Renewal in Lame Duck
17 hours ago

Republican House leaders are planning on taking up a vote to renew the Iran Sanctions Act as soon as the lame-duck session begins in mid-November. The law, which expires on Dec. 31, permits a host of sanctions against Iran's industries, defense, and government. The renewal will likely pass the House, but its status is unclear once it reaches the Senate, and a spokesman from the White House refused to say whether President Obama would sign it into law.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.