Iran Hawks Flounder Against Reid-Obama Coalition

US President Barack Obama(R) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV, arrive for a meeting with the Senate Democratic Caucus on July 31, 2013 in the US Capitol in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Add to Briefcase
Stacy Kaper
Jan. 16, 2014, 3:23 p.m.

Sen­ate Ir­an hawks have lots of votes to back their sanc­tions le­gis­la­tion. What they lack is a plan to get the bill to the floor.

Fifty-nine sen­at­ors — in­clud­ing 16 Demo­crats — have signed onto sanc­tions le­gis­la­tion from Demo­crat­ic Sen. Robert Men­en­dez and Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Mark Kirk. The meas­ure would pun­ish Ir­an with sanc­tions if it reneges on an in­ter­im nuc­le­ar agree­ment or if that agree­ment does not ul­ti­mately ab­ol­ish any nuc­le­ar-weapons cap­ab­il­it­ies for Ir­an.

That count has climbed rap­idly since the bi­par­tis­an pair in­tro­duced their le­gis­la­tion in late Decem­ber. But now it’s un­clear wheth­er that sup­port will be enough to clear the bill’s next ma­jor hurdle: Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id.

Re­id is sid­ing with the White House, which has put in­tense pres­sure on law­makers not to act on sanc­tions, ar­guing it could res­ult in both a nuc­le­ar-armed and hos­tile Ir­a­ni­an state. And without Re­id’s back­ing, sup­port­ers of the Men­en­dez-Kirk bill are un­sure how to move the meas­ure to the floor.

“I as­sume that if the Demo­crat sen­at­ors put enough pres­sure on Sen­at­or Re­id he might bring it to the floor,” said Mis­souri Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Roy Blunt. “But, you know, we are at a mo­ment in the Sen­ate where noth­ing hap­pens that Sen­at­or Re­id doesn’t want to hap­pen; and this is something at this mo­ment that Sen­at­or Re­id doesn’t want to hap­pen.”

And for now, sanc­tions sup­port­ers are still mulling their strategy.

“We are talk­ing amongst ourselves. There is a very act­ive de­bate and dis­cus­sion on­go­ing about how best to move for­ward,” said Demo­crat­ic Sen. Richard Blu­menth­al of Con­necti­c­ut, a co­spon­sor of the bill. “There are a num­ber of al­tern­at­ive strategies, but we’re de­lib­er­at­ing them.”

While Re­id has, at least for now, foiled their policy plans, sanc­tions sup­port­ers are still scor­ing the de­sired polit­ic­al points on the is­sue. They can re­port their ef­forts to their con­stitu­ents while blam­ing Re­id for the in­ac­tion.

But whatever pres­sure Re­id is get­ting from his col­leagues, he’s also get­ting sup­port from the com­mand­er in chief.

In a White House meet­ing Wed­nes­day night, Pres­id­ent Obama made a hard sell to Demo­crats on the is­sue, plead­ing with them to back off sanc­tions while his team worked on a nuc­le­ar pact.

“The pres­id­ent did speak pas­sion­ately about how [we] must seize this op­por­tun­ity, that we need to seize this six months “¦ and that if Ir­an isn’t will­ing to in the end make the de­cisions ne­ces­sary to make it work, he’ll be ready to sign a bill to tight­en those sanc­tions — but we gotta give this six months,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley of Ore­gon, after re­turn­ing from the White House.

In the mean­time, many bill sup­port­ers reas­on that Re­id will even­tu­ally feel the heat.

“We’ll just have to ratchet up the pres­sure, that’s all,” said Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Mc­Cain. “The pres­id­ent is push­ing back, ob­vi­ously, and he’s ap­peal­ing to the loy­alty of Demo­crats, but there are a lot of oth­er forces out there that are push­ing in the oth­er dir­ec­tion, so we’ll see how they re­act.”

Earli­er this week Sen. Lind­sey Gra­ham, R-S.C., said he was hop­ing to find more Demo­crat­ic co­spon­sors over the re­cess and was talk­ing to House Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Eric Can­tor about wheth­er the Re­pub­lic­an-con­trolled House might take up the Sen­ate sanc­tions bill as a way to spur the Sen­ate to act. But neither of Gra­ham’s ap­proaches rep­res­ents a broad, co­ordin­ated cam­paign.

Demo­crats, who have more power to drive the train in the Sen­ate, seem to be in little hurry.

“I don’t think there is any time sched­ule re­lated to it at this point,” said Demo­crat­ic co­spon­sor Ben Cardin of Mary­land. “We are all try­ing to fig­ure out how we can be most help­ful and make sure Ir­an does not be­come a nuc­le­ar-weapon state.”

Men­en­dez, the New Jer­sey Demo­crat who chairs the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee and is the lead Demo­crat­ic spon­sor, said he is fo­cused on hear­ing more from the ad­min­is­tra­tion about the re­por­ted un­of­fi­cial secret “side deal” with Tehran.

About the plans to pro­ceed, Men­en­dez said non­com­mit­tally, “We’ll see.”

Kirk, the Illinois Re­pub­lic­an who is the oth­er lead spon­sor, said he was count­ing on elec­tions pres­sure to spark ac­tion.

“My hope is that, as we get to­wards midterm elec­tions, mem­bers are go­ing to want to be on re­cord be­ing against giv­ing up bil­lions of dol­lars to Ir­an,” Kirk said.

Oth­er mem­bers are hop­ing lob­by­ing groups can carry the weight on this one. Mc­Cain said he hoped pro-Is­rael groups could con­vince Demo­crats to spring in­to ac­tion or that sup­port­ers could make it un­com­fort­able for Re­id to con­tin­ue block­ing the bill.

“We’ll see what hap­pens — wheth­er the pres­sure builds, how act­ive some of these con­stitu­en­cies are, par­tic­u­larly in states with large pro-Is­rael pop­u­la­tions,” Mc­Cain said. “And we may just start bring­ing it up and say­ing, ‘We ask un­an­im­ous con­sent that we bring it up,’ and make Sen­at­or Re­id ob­ject.”

Michael Catalin contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
CANNOT “IN GOOD CONSCIENCE” VOTE FOR BILL
McCain Won’t Support Graham-Cassidy Bill
2 hours ago
THE LATEST

In a statement Friday, Sen. John McCain wrote, "I cannot in good conscience vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. I believe we could do better working together, Republicans and Democrats, and have not yet really tried. Nor could I support it without knowing how much it will cost, how it will effect insurance premiums, and how many people will be helped or hurt by it. Without a full CBO score, which won't be available by the end of the month, we won't have reliable answers to any of those questions." His "no" vote makes it much less likely Republicans will repeal and replace Obamacare by Sept. 30.

Source:
NEW DIRECTIVES ISSUED
DeVos Officially Replaces Obama-era Sexual Assault Guidelines
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

As anticipated, the Department of Education today withdrew the controversial Obama-era "Dear Colleague" letter on campus sexual assault, replacing it with new interim guidance. Most notably, the new guidance permits colleges to use a “clear and convincing” standard of evidence, rather than the preponderance of evidence standard that the 2011 letter seemed to mandate. "The new guidance also states that colleges may facilitate informal resolutions, including mediation, if all parties agree to participate in that process."

Source:
EXPECTED TO TAKE EFFECT BY SUNDAY
Country-Specific Rules to Replace Travel Ban
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Trump administration will unveil more tailored restrictions on travelers from certain countries as a replacement to the controversial travel ban, according to a senior administration official. The new restrictions will vary by country. They could include a ban on travel to the United States, or new restrictions on obtaining a visa for citizens of particular countries." They are expected to be unveiled by Sunday.

Source:
MORE TRANSPARENCY THAN FEC REQUIRES
Facebook Enhances Disclosure for Political Ads
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In a live-streamed address from Silicon Valley, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced a nine-point plan that the tech giant is rolling out over coming months to respond to "efforts by nation-states and private actors to use the social media platform to influence U.S. elections." Most importantly, the company will force all advertisers to disclose what ads they're running to all audiences. “When someone buys political ads on TV or other media, they’re required by law to disclose who paid for them,” Zuckerberg said. “But you still don’t know if you’re seeing the same messages as everyone else. So we’re going to bring Facebook to an even higher standard of transparency. Not only will you have to disclose which page paid for an ad, but we will also make it so you can visit an advertiser’s page and see the ads they’re currently running to any audience on Facebook.”

Source:
TRUMP ADMIN CRACKING DOWN ON LEAKS
Mandatory Training EPA Employees on Leaking
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

As "part of a broader Trump administration order for anti-leaks training at all executive branch agencies," Environmental Protection Agency employees "are attending mandatory training sessions this week to reinforce their compliance with laws and rules against leaking classified or sensitive government information ... Relatively few EPA employees deal with classified files, but the new training also reinforces requirements to keep 'Controlled Unclassified Information' from unauthorized disclosure."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login