Why Education Is the Big Issue in Gubernatorial Races

Governors across the country — Democratic and Republican — are putting renewed emphasis on education as the economy improves in their states.

Children look at books at a day care center for children aged 12 months to six years on December 22, 2011 in Munich, Germany.
National Journal
Karyn Bruggeman
Add to Briefcase
Karyn Bruggeman
Jan. 23, 2014, 10:54 a.m.

Across the coun­try, Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors seek­ing reelec­tion this year are pro­pos­ing new in­vest­ments in edu­ca­tion after fa­cing cri­ti­cism from Demo­crats for cut­ting school budgets dur­ing their first terms. At the same time, Demo­crats, in­clud­ing po­ten­tial fu­ture pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate An­drew Cuomo of New York, are open­ing a new front in the battle over edu­ca­tion, back­ing uni­ver­sal pre-kinder­garten.

It’s all part of a na­tion­wide trend: em­phas­is on edu­ca­tion — and for Demo­crats, eco­nom­ic in­equal­ity — now that the eco­nomy is re­cov­er­ing in many states.

Cuomo on Tues­day pro­posed us­ing ex­ist­ing state funds to ex­tend uni­ver­sal pre-K statewide. The pro­pos­al comes after New York City May­or Bill de Bla­sio made uni­ver­sal pre-K a theme of his cam­paign. De Bla­sio had ad­voc­ated in­creas­ing taxes on wealthy New York­ers to pay for it, but Cuomo said that in­creased rev­en­ues and de­creased ex­pendit­ures made the money avail­able for the state.

Demo­crats in oth­er states, in­clud­ing Hawaii, Mary­land, and Mas­sachu­setts, have taken pages out of de Bla­sio’s book and fo­cused on ex­pand­ing uni­ver­sal pre-K pro­grams, and many of those mount­ing chal­lenges to GOP gov­ernors have made edu­ca­tion spend­ing a center­piece of their cam­paigns.

Mean­while, Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors across the coun­try are claim­ing cred­it for the eco­nom­ic re­cov­ery in their states, but rising in­come in­equal­ity and edu­ca­tion’s role in lev­el­ing the play­ing field is poised to be­come a big­ger part of the de­bate over con­tin­ued prosper­ity. Demo­crats have been ham­mer­ing Re­pub­lic­an Govs. Tom Corbett of Pennsylvania, Nath­an Deal of Geor­gia, Nikki Haley of South Car­o­lina, and Sam Brown­back of Kan­sas par­tic­u­larly hard for cuts made to state edu­ca­tion budgets dur­ing their first terms, and their vo­cal op­pos­i­tion has promp­ted the four to take ac­tion to blunt the cri­ti­cism.

Sources close to Corbett say he will un­veil a plan next month to in­vest $200 mil­lion in Pennsylvania schools, and last week he at­temp­ted his first-ever vis­it to a Phil­adelphia pub­lic school since tak­ing of­fice. In Geor­gia, Deal ded­ic­ated a ma­jor chunk of his State of the State ad­dress to pledging to put more than half a bil­lion dol­lars in new rev­en­ue to­ward schools. Two of Deal’s chal­lengers, Re­pub­lic­an John Barge, who is Geor­gia’s state school su­per­in­tend­ent, and Demo­crat Jason Carter, have de­cried past cuts and poin­ted to the low pri­or­it­iz­a­tion of edu­ca­tion spend­ing as one of the main causes of the state’s poor eco­nomy.

Haley also pro­posed this month to put 80 per­cent of new state rev­en­ues to­ward edu­ca­tion in South Car­o­lina, even ex­pli­citly re­com­mend­ing that new spend­ing be dir­ec­ted to­ward dis­tricts with the needi­est stu­dents.

And Kan­sas’s Brown­back made an ef­fort to sty­mie the nar­rat­ive that he doesn’t care about edu­ca­tion by un­leash­ing an $80 mil­lion plan to fund all-day kinder­garten in his an­nu­al State of the State ad­dress de­livered last week, as he faced blow­back from a court battle. The state Su­preme Court is set to rule any day on wheth­er Kan­sas has to cough up an ad­di­tion­al $600 mil­lion for loc­al school dis­tricts after the Kan­sas State Board of Edu­ca­tion claimed Brown­back was un­der­fund­ing schools by roughly as much for 2014. Brown­back was de­fi­ant in his speech, stat­ing that “[t]he Con­sti­tu­tion em­powers the Le­gis­lature — the people’s rep­res­ent­at­ives — to fund our schools.”

State House Minor­ity Lead­er Paul Dav­is, Brown­back’s likely gen­er­al-elec­tion op­pon­ent, has been us­ing the is­sue to por­tray the in­cum­bent as slash­ing budgets in a way that’s do­ing real harm to the state and turn­ing some mem­bers of his own party against him.

In Texas, Demo­crat­ic state Sen. Wendy Dav­is and GOP At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Greg Ab­bott have sparred over $5.4 bil­lion in cuts to pub­lic schools, which Dav­is tried to block in her less­er-known first fili­buster a few years ago. In his ca­pa­city as AG, Ab­bott has been re­spons­ible for de­fend­ing the cuts in court, and both can­did­ates have un­veiled com­pet­ing plans in an ef­fort to claim the high ground.

Demo­crats will try to frame this as elec­tion-year polit­ics, ar­guing that Re­pub­lic­ans have come un­der fire be­fore but waited un­til now to re­verse course.

Danny Kan­ner, com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the Demo­crat­ic Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation, called these “elec­tion-year gim­micks.”

“For the first three years when nearly all of these gov­ernors were in of­fice, they de­cided that tax cuts for the wealth­i­est and cor­por­a­tions were more im­port­ant than spend­ing on edu­ca­tion,” said Kan­ner. “[T]o the ex­tent that there is money to spend now on edu­ca­tion, it’s be­cause they cut it in the first place. They demon­strated their val­ues and pri­or­it­ies, and no elec­tion-year head­line will change that.”

On the oth­er hand, every state was forced to slim down budgets dur­ing the re­ces­sion, though some made steep­er cuts than oth­ers. Re­pub­lic­ans ar­gue that com­ing out of the re­ces­sion, re­newed in­vest­ment in edu­ca­tion is a sign that the states are re­bound­ing and able to re­plen­ish their stocks with new funds. “In 2014, im­prov­ing edu­ca­tion is a top pri­or­ity” of Re­pub­lic­an gov­ernors, said Jon Thompson, press sec­ret­ary of the Re­pub­lic­an Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation. “Not in­vest­ing in edu­ca­tion can im­pact a pro-growth agenda.”

Thompson be­lieves that when it comes to edu­ca­tion spend­ing, it’s “usu­ally wel­comed and not framed as an elec­tion is­sue.”

“No one ever gets on the stage and an op­pon­ent’s go­ing to say, ‘Shame on you for rais­ing teach­er salar­ies and in­vest­ing in edu­ca­tion,’” said Thompson. “It really does de­pend on what states are com­ing back from the brink and had de­fi­cits when they made these cuts, and if they’re able to af­ford it they’ll do it.”

COR­REC­TION: A pre­vi­ous ver­sion of this story in­cor­rectly stated that Corbett vis­ited the Phil­adelphia school. He ac­tu­ally “ab­ruptly can­celed the ap­pear­ance” after protest­ors gathered out­side the school, the Phil­adelphia Daily News re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
20 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
23 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
1 days ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login