Why It’s OK to Be a Gay Republican

The Republican Party, too, is a home for LGBT Americans.

CANADA - JUNE 19:  Summit Of Industrial Countries In Toronto On June 19th, 1988,In Toronto,Canada
National Journal
Gregory T. Angelo
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Gregory T. Angelo
Jan. 23, 2014, 4 p.m.

Why should gay people be Re­pub­lic­ans? Be­cause gay people are “¦ people. Gay Amer­ic­ans are Amer­ic­ans. And most Amer­ic­ans aren’t single-is­sue voters. They are, on the whole, more cen­ter-right than cen­ter-left, more fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive than wealth-dis­tributive, and hap­pi­er to spend their money as they see fit than to have the gov­ern­ment do it for them by man­date.

There are three com­mon prin­ciples shared by the Re­pub­lic­an Party of 2014: small-gov­ern­ment philo­sophy, in­di­vidu­al-em­power­ing policy, and the li­on­iz­a­tion of Ron­ald Re­agan. Log Cab­in Re­pub­lic­ans was formed in Cali­for­nia in 1977 spe­cific­ally to sup­port Re­agan, who at the time spoke out boldly against Pro­pos­i­tion 6, oth­er­wise known as the Briggs Ini­ti­at­ive — a ref­er­en­dum, not un­like 2008’s Pro­pos­i­tion 8, in which voters in Cali­for­nia were asked to make it il­leg­al for openly gay in­di­vidu­als to be teach­ers in the state’s pub­lic schools.

Re­agan’s stance against Prop 6 was a tre­mend­ous polit­ic­al risk: This was a man who had been gov­ernor of Cali­for­nia, who was eye­ing an­oth­er run for the pres­id­ency of the United States, and who made this de­clar­a­tion in 1977. Be­fore Re­agan’s op­pos­i­tion to Briggs, the ini­ti­at­ive was set to pass 2-to-1; fol­low­ing Re­agan’s push against it, the ini­ti­at­ive failed by the same ra­tio.

Sev­en years later, dur­ing a ques­tion-and-an­swer ses­sion with fe­male Re­pub­lic­an elec­ted of­fi­cials, Re­agan said: “And let me say, there is no place in the Re­pub­lic­an Party for those who would ex­hib­it pre­ju­dice against any­one. There’s no place in our party for the kind of bigotry and ugly rhet­or­ic that we’ve been hear­ing out­side our party re­cently. We have no room for hate here, and we have no place for the haters.”

In sup­port of Re­agan’s cour­age, and in a nod to the GOP’s roots in equal­ity — eman­cip­a­tion, suf­frage, the Civil Rights Act, and more — a group of gay Re­pub­lic­ans in Cali­for­nia chose to or­gan­ize un­der the name Log Cab­in Re­pub­lic­ans as an homage to the birth­place of the first Re­pub­lic­an on the right side of his­tory: Ab­ra­ham Lin­coln.

In the dec­ades since Re­agan made the state­ment that there was “no place for the haters” in his party, the GOP has in­creas­ingly moved to­ward equal­ity when it comes to gay rights. Log Cab­in Re­pub­lic­ans’ lob­by­ing across the coun­try has led to more than 250 GOP le­gis­lat­ors cast­ing votes in fa­vor of mar­riage equal­ity; five cur­rently sit­ting Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers of Con­gress who sup­port the free­dom to marry; nearly one-quarter of the Sen­ate GOP caucus vot­ing in sup­port of em­ploy­ment pro­tec­tions for LGBT in­di­vidu­als — and that’s just for starters.

This year, we have two out mem­bers of Log Cab­in Re­pub­lic­ans run­ning for Con­gress — Carl De­Maio in Cali­for­nia and Richard Ti­sei in Mas­sachu­setts — both of whom have not only our sup­port but also the sup­port of GOP lead­er­ship, in­clud­ing the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Con­gres­sion­al Com­mit­tee and the GOP House lead­er­ship. They un­der­stand that mov­ing to­ward equal­ity is the path to vic­tory.

If Re­pub­lic­ans hon­or the legacies of Re­agan and Lin­coln, re­mem­ber our party’s his­tory, and re­fuse to fall prey to either the cul­ture wars (propag­ated by left­ists de­term­ined to fo­cus on any­thing but the eco­nomy) or so­cial con­ser­vat­ives on the fringe right, the party plat­form’s core prin­ciples should nat­ur­ally at­tract those voters — gay and straight — who re­ject the big-gov­ern­ment philo­sophy es­poused by “pro­gress­ives” hell-bent on mi­cro-reg­u­la­tion of the lives of all Amer­ic­ans, and who re­ject the cul­ture of per­petu­al vic­tim­hood propag­ated by left­ists whose elect­or­al road map re­lies upon di­vid­ing a united Amer­ica in­to a patch­work of spe­cial in­terests whose only hope for prosper­ity is gov­ern­ment.

That’s our Log Cab­in: It’s the house that Lin­coln built. It’s the house that Re­agan foun­ded. And it will forever be the home for equal­ity-minded con­ser­vat­ives — gay and straight — who stand on the right side of his­tory.

The au­thor is ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Log Cab­in Re­pub­lic­ans.

What We're Following See More »
SCENE APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN CLEANED, SANITIZED
Turks Say They Found Evidence that Khashoggi Was Killed in Embassy
1 days ago
THE LATEST
SAYS MBS CAN NEVER BE A WORLD LEADER
Graham Threatens Sanctions on Saudi Arabia
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“I’m not going back to Saudi Arabia as long as" Mohammed Bin Salman is in charge, Sen. Lindsey Graham said on Fox News today. “I’ve been their biggest defender on the floor of the United States Senate. This guy is a wrecking ball. He had [Khashoggi] murdered in a consulate in Turkey and to expect me to ignore it, I feel used and abused. The MBS figure is to me toxic, he can never be a world leader on the world stage.” Graham added that he intends to "sanction the hell out of Saudi Arabia.”

Source:
INTERROGATION GONE WRONG
Report: Saudis Planning to Admit to Khashoggi Killing
2 days ago
THE LATEST
TURKEY STILL DECRIES LACK OF COOPERATION
Saudis Will Let Turkish Officials Search Embassy
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Saudi Arabia has given Turkey permission to search its Istanbul consulate Monday afternoon, a Turkish diplomatic source told CNN. Saudi officials first granted permission for the consulate to be searched last week, but later asked for a delay and no search has yet taken place. Turkish officials also want to search the nearby consul general's residence, and have repeatedly accused the Saudis of failing to cooperate with their investigation."

Source:
"OUR SAUDI ARABIAN CITIZEN"
Pompeo To Discuss Khashoggi With Saudi King
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login