As lethal-injection drugs become harder to come by, states are turning to electrocution to carry out executions.
The Virginia House of Delegates passed a bill Wednesday that would mandate electrocution be used to carry out a death sentence if a lethal injection cannot be performed. The vote is the latest and boldest maneuver in a steady stream of state moves aimed at addressing the growing shortage of death-penalty drugs.
States across the country are running out of the drugs they have relied on for decades to carry out death sentences, as European manufacturers are making it increasingly difficult to procure such chemicals if their use is to be a lethal injection. The European Union strongly opposes capital punishment and has pressured companies that knowingly export drugs to the U.S. for executions.
Virginia’s move would make it the first state in the country to mandate death by electrocution. The measure, House Bill 1052, passed by a vote of 64-32. To become law, it would need to clear the state’s Senate and get a signature from new Democratic Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a prospect that currently seems unlikely.
Other states, also facing drug shortages, are turning to execution methods that until recently have been declared all but obsolete.
Last week a lawmaker in Wyoming proposed a return to the firing squad because it is “the cheapest [option] for the state.” Missouri’s Statehouse is also flirting with reintroducting firing squads, which a bill sponsor said was “no less humane than lethal injection.” Democratic U.S. Sen. Claire McCaskill tweeted in response, “Not my state’s finest moment.”
Most states, including Florida and Texas, are either turning to secret compounding pharmacies to procure their drugs or carrying out executions with new, untested lethal-injection cocktails. Ohio executed Dennis McGuire last week with a two-drug protocol that reportedly left the convicted murderer and rapist writhing in pain for 10 minutes.
Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, which officially takes no stance but is usually regarded as opposed to capital punishment, called the proposals in Virginia and elsewhere “mostly symbolic” attempts to make access to necessary lethal drugs easier for states.
“There are plenty of drugs to kill people with,” Dieter said. “What states don’t want is a lot of interference. These are statements aimed at courts or regulators to allow lethal injections.”
Dieter added that the “demise of the death penalty would be hastened” if firing squads or electric chairs became normal again because of the inevitable cruel-and-unusual-punishment challenges that would await.
Virginia currently allows death-row inmates to choose between death by lethal injection or electrocution. The latter option has only been used in seven of the 86 executions Virginia performed since 1995, according to DPIC. Virginia’s last execution, on Jan. 16, 2013, was carried out in an electric chair.
“The ‘cruel and unusual’ clause is not concerned if the inmate chooses a punishment,” Dieter said. “If the warden chooses it, that’s a different thing.”
The state’s Department of Corrections has said its lethal-injection drug supply will expire in November.
Republican Del. Jackson Miller, the bill’s sponsor, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
To learn more about the wide-reaching implications of states confronting lethal-injection drug shortages, read National Journal‘s earlier coverage here.
What We're Following See More »
In light of his recent confessions, the speakership of Dennis Hastert is being judged far more harshly. The New York Times' Carl Hulse notes that in hindsight, Hastert now "fares poorly" on a number of fronts, from his handling of the Mark Foley page scandal to "an explosion" of earmarks to the weakening of committee chairmen. "Even his namesake Hastert rule—the informal standard that no legislation should be brought to a vote without the support of a majority of the majority — has come to be seen as a structural barrier to compromise."
Even if "[t]he Republican presidential nomination may be in his sights ... Trump has so far ignored vital preparations needed for a quick and effective transition to the general election. The New York businessman has collected little information about tens of millions of voters he needs to turn out in the fall. He's sent few people to battleground states compared with likely Democratic rival Hillary Clinton, accumulated little if any research on her, and taken no steps to build a network capable of raising the roughly $1 billion needed to run a modern-day general election campaign."
Rep. Dave Young can't even refuse his own paycheck. The Iowa Republican is trying to make a point that if Congress can't pass a budget (it's already missed the April 15 deadline) then it shouldn't be paid. But, he's been informed, the 27th Amendment prohibits him from refusing his own pay. "Young’s efforts to dock his own pay, however, are duck soup compared to his larger goal: docking the pay of every lawmaker when Congress drops the budget ball." His bill to stiff his colleagues has only mustered the support of three of them. Another bill, sponsored by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN), has about three dozen co-sponsors.
Sixty miles away, in Sandusky, Ohio. "We're pretty bitter about that," said Harmeet Dhillon, vice chairwoman of the California Republican Party. "It sucks to be California, we're like the ugly stepchild. They need us for our cash and our donors, they don't need us for anything else."
Anyone looking forward to seeing some boldfaced names on the client list of the late Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the "DC Madam," will have to wait a little longer. "The Supreme Court announced Monday it would not intervene to allow" the release of her phone records, "despite one of her former attorneys claiming the records are “very relevant” to the presidential election. Though he has repeatedly threatened to release the records if courts do not modify a 2007 restraining order, Montgomery Blair Sibley tells U.S. News he’s not quite sure what he now will do."