Sanders Suggests Using War Funding for Veterans Bill

Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-VT), listens to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar testify during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on May 18, 2010 in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony about the accident involving the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that exploded and is now leaking oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
Add to Briefcase
Jordain Carney
Jan. 22, 2014, 3:30 p.m.

Sen. Bernie Sanders sug­ges­ted Wed­nes­day that war funds could be used to pay for some or all of his om­ni­bus vet­er­ans bill, but he could face an up­hill battle in the House.

The bill, which Sanders in­tro­duced last week, tackles a swath of vet­er­ans is­sues, in­clud­ing health care, edu­ca­tion, em­ploy­ment, and — an is­sue on the minds of many mem­bers of Con­gress — restor­ing the roughly $6 bil­lion in pen­sions cut dur­ing the budget agree­ment to work­ing-age mil­it­ary re­tir­ees.

Sanders pro­posed off­set­ting the cost of the le­gis­la­tion by us­ing the Over­seas Con­tin­gency Op­er­a­tions funds, which have been used to pay for the wars in Ir­aq and Afgh­anistan.

“I be­lieve, hav­ing looked at this, that there is more than enough money in that fund to fund this le­gis­la­tion,” Sanders said. But he noted that the fi­nal de­cision will have to be made in con­junc­tion with Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship.

Sanders told re­port­ers Wed­nes­day that he ex­pects the le­gis­la­tion to cost $30 bil­lion over 10 years.

The Ver­mont in­de­pend­ent said Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id wants to bring the bill be­fore the Sen­ate “as quickly as he pos­sibly can,” but sidestepped ques­tions on a spe­cif­ic timeline.

Re­id has filed the bill un­der Rule 14 — which al­lows le­gis­la­tion to skip the com­mit­tee pro­cess — mean­ing the pro­pos­al could be taken up as soon as the Sen­ate re­con­venes next week.

“This is one of the most com­pre­hens­ive pieces of vet­er­ans le­gis­la­tion that has been in­tro­duced in dec­ades,” Sanders said, adding that the bill tackles many con­cerns raised in re­cent years.

Ap­prox­im­ately 18 mil­it­ary and vet­er­ans or­gan­iz­a­tions have backed the pro­pos­al, and the sen­at­or said he be­lieves it will soon have the sup­port of every ma­jor vet­er­ans or­gan­iz­a­tion in the coun­try.

The bill in­cludes sev­er­al pieces of le­gis­la­tion pre­vi­ously passed out of the Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee, and Sanders noted that many of those bills re­ceived bi­par­tis­an sup­port. He said he has yet to reach out to Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues, but plans to do so soon.

Al­though Sanders said he is “op­tim­ist­ic that we can work with our friends in the House,” a Re­pub­lic­an aide with the House Vet­er­ans’ Af­fairs Com­mit­tee quickly pushed back against the pro­pos­al.

“That money is not a reg­u­lar budget item and by design will run out once Over­seas Con­tin­gency Op­er­a­tions have ended, and there­fore is prob­ably not the best vehicle to use as an off­set,” the aide said, re­fer­ring to us­ing the OCO funds to pay for the vet­er­ans bill.

A 2012 Con­gres­sion­al Budget Of­fice re­port notes that “there is no ‘OCO fund’ set aside in the Treas­ury from which re­sources can be drawn in fu­ture years.”

The Re­pub­lic­an aide ad­ded that al­though mem­bers “sup­port the ul­ti­mate goals of a num­ber of ini­ti­at­ives” in Sanders’s bill, “we feel vet­er­ans would be bet­ter served if the Sen­ate took a more meas­ured, piece­meal ap­proach to passing some of the ini­ti­at­ives.”

What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
4 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
9 hours ago
THE LATEST
REDSKINS IMPLICATIONS
SCOTUS to Hear Case on Offensive Trademarks
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

"The Supreme Court is taking up a First Amendment clash over the government’s refusal to register offensive trademarks, a case that could affect the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. The justices agreed Thursday to hear a dispute involving an Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but they did not act on a separate request to hear the higher-profile Redskins case at the same time." Still, any precedent set by the case could have ramifications for the Washington football team.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Bannon Still Collecting Royalties from ‘Seinfeld’
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The Hollywood Reporter takes a look at a little-known intersection of politics and entertainment, in which Trump campaign CEO Steve Bannon is still raking in residuals from Seinfeld. Here's the digest version: When Seinfeld was in its infancy, Ted Turner was in the process of acquiring its production company, Castle Rock, but he was under-capitalized. Bannon's fledgling media company put up the remaining funds, and he agreed to "participation rights" instead of a fee. "Seinfeld has reaped more than $3 billion in its post-network afterlife through syndication deals." Meanwhile, Bannon is "still cashing checks from Seinfeld, and observers say he has made nearly 25 times more off the Castle Rock deal than he had anticipated."

Source:
×