Greece wants absolute guarantees that destroying Syria’s warfare chemicals would not endanger the Mediterranean, the Xinhua News Agency reports.
Athens is not alone in its nervousness about the plan for eliminating Damascus chemicals; British citizens also are beginning to voice safety concerns related to their nation’s involvement in the process.
Greek Foreign Minister Evangelos Venizelos asked EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton to demand the guarantees from the United Nations and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. The two organizations are overseeing efforts to eliminate the Syrian government’s chemical-warfare stockpile by the end of June.
Emma Bonino, Evangelos’ Italian equivalent, “agreed on the sending of a letter to the director of the OPCW,” the Greek Foreign Ministry added in a statement on Wednesday.
The Syrian chemical arsenal’s deadliest components are being transported through the violence-wracked nation to coastal city of Latakia, where they are to be loaded on Danish and Norwegian transport ships. The chemicals then would travel under international escort to an Italian port, where they would enter the custody of a U.S. vessel equipped to destroy them.
Greece is seeking confirmation that there is “no doubt … as to the security and protection of the Mediterranean environment during the process of the transporting and destruction of Syrian chemical weapons,” the Greek Foreign Ministry said.
In earlier discussions with Greenpeace, Oceanica and the World Wildlife Fund, OCPW Director General Ahmet Üzümcü asserted that the destruction effort would not drop any byproducts into the Mediterranean Sea. Representatives of the watchdog groups conveyed that promise to Venizelos on Wednesday, according to the ministry statement.
Meanwhile, petitioners in the United Kingdom have gathered nearly 400 signatures in opposition to the planned elimination of less-dangerous Syrian chemical-arms ingredients at Ellesmere Port, the Liverpool Echo reported.
The president of Syria, Bashar Assad, admitted his government’s possession of chemical weapons and agreed to eliminate them after Damascus was blamed for a nerve-gas strike allegedly resulting in more than 1,400 civilian deaths last August.
What We're Following See More »
The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.
"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."
No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."
"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."