Dennis Rodman can’t catch a break.
On top of an abysmal trip to North Korea which ended with him taking a direct flight to rehab, Dennis Rodman is now the subject of a U.S. Treasury Department investigation because of gifts he gave to Kim Jong Un.
Showering a North Korean dictator with gifts not only looks bad paper, it’s possibly against the law, as it could be a violation of American and United Nations sanctions against the nation and its people. Rodman reportedly brought many gifts with him in honor of Kim’s 31st birthday ranging from suits, to a fur coat, to bottles of Jameson, to an expensive handbag. Those gifts allegedly costs upwards of $10,000 and experts believe those gifts could be seen as violations of U.N. sanctions.
What’s perhaps more pressing for an American like Rodman is that these gifts actually violate U.S. law.
The Daily Beast reports: “Rodman may have violated an American law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act … which makes it a violation of U.S. law for any person determined by the Treasury and State Departments ‘to have, directly or indirectly, imported, exported, or reexported luxury goods to or into North Korea.’”
Gathering information from an unnamed U.S. official, the Daily Beast is reporting that the Treasury Department is actually investigating if Rodman broke that luxury good law. The State Department earlier had voiced their displeasure with Rodman’s visit, calling it “marginally unhelpful.”
The Beast also seems to think the feds have a pretty good case.”Rodman could have applied for an export license for the goods, although export licenses for North Korea must meet strict criteria and luxury goods are specifically excluded from the list of items that could receive licenses, according to federal regulations.”
Depending on what, if anything, Rodman brought over (and how much the government wants to smack him down), he could face up to $250,000 in fines or up to 20 years in jail if convicted.
Reprinted with permission from The Wire. The original story can be found here.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.