Have Environmentalists Finally Gotten Over Themselves?

One man’s quest to win public opinion begins with teaching like-minded activists the art of self-effacement.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Add to Briefcase
Lucia Graves
Jan. 27, 2014, 6:06 a.m.

There’s noth­ing more ser­i­ous than cli­mate change, abor­tion, and fin­an­cial cor­rup­tion, but what if tak­ing ourselves less ser­i­ously is what al­lows our is­sues to gain trac­tion?

That’s the mes­sage from Keith Gaby, who, in his work as com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund, is en­cour­aging like-minded act­iv­ists to not take them­selves as ser­i­ously as they take their work.

“There’s a ste­reo­type,” said Gaby, “par­tic­u­larly among people who are dis­trust­ing of the en­vir­on­ment­al move­ment, that en­vir­on­ment­al­ists are overly ser­i­ous and overly earn­est and not ne­ces­sar­ily in­ter­ested in oth­er people’s point of view.” That’s a ste­reo­type, sure, but there’s enough truth to it, Gaby says, that it’s something mem­bers of the move­ment should look at.

It could be said of many act­iv­ist groups. Mem­bers of the tea party aren’t known for their witty, com­ic riffs, nor do people in the abor­tion move­ment get many belly laughs; in the Oc­cupy Wall Street move­ment, you’re more likely to get pep­per-sprayed. “They take their cause so ser­i­ously that it bleeds over in­to tak­ing them­selves ser­i­ously,” Gaby ob­served.

Some groups haven’t man­aged to make that dis­tinc­tion between self-ser­i­ous­ness and ser­i­ous­ness of sub­ject mat­ter so well. A co­ali­tion of young Chris­ti­an-Right lead­ers, for in­stance, re­cently re­vealed that their new plan to ap­peal to mil­len­ni­als is to make abor­tion funny. “You can en­gage with sar­casm; it’s hard with the abor­tion is­sue, but you have to,” Stu­dents for Life Pres­id­ent Kristan Hawkins told Salon in June. “Un­for­tu­nately, we have to, be­cause this is the gen­er­a­tion that we’ve been dealt.”

Oth­er ad­vocacy groups simply have it easi­er than en­vir­on­ment­al­ists. Mar­riage-equal­ity groups, who’ve en­joyed tre­mend­ous polit­ic­al suc­cesses in re­cent years, have had sit­coms like Will & Grace and Mod­ern Fam­ily to nor­mal­ize gay re­la­tion­ships and get laughs. En­vir­on­ment­al­ists have Bill McK­ib­ben.

There’s a reas­on no en­vir­on­ment­al sit­coms ex­ist. Sus­tain­ab­il­ity jokes are simply not go­ing to win the rat­ings war. Bill Ma­h­er once said the en­vir­on­ment is “one of the hard­est sub­jects to do in com­edy.” And Brit­ish comedi­an Mar­cus Brig­stocke has called cli­mate change “far and away the most dif­fi­cult com­edy sub­ject I’ve ever dealt with.”

Even a web­site like Grist, foun­ded with the mis­sion of in­fus­ing its en­vir­on­ment­al stor­ies with hu­mor, says it isn’t easy be­ing both funny and green. “It turns out ‘en­vir­on­ment­al hu­mor‘ is not that funny,” wrote the au­thor of the site’s ad­vice column. “At least in the form of the clas­sic jokes and one-liners. Please do not tell our aud­it­ors.”

That sites like Grist struggle is no sur­prise to Gaby. “The work we do is really ser­i­ous,” he said. “It’s no ex­ag­ger­a­tion to say we’re try­ing to make the fu­ture bet­ter, we’re try­ing to save lives and the plan­et is at stake.” The con­cepts are so big, he ex­plains, that you can lose sight of the fact that oth­er people “might find you a little over­bear­ing at times.”

Back in 2005, The Daily Show made a vali­ant ef­fort to jump-start an en­vir­on­ment­al com­edy seg­ment called The War on Terra. But the res­ults, as en­vir­on­ment­al writer Dave Roberts lamen­ted at the time, just wer­en’t that funny. And that just about sums it up: Even the fun­ni­est guys on the plan­et couldn’t come up with good cli­mate-change jokes. The seg­ment, for doubters and the curi­ous, is here.

Oth­er comedi­ans have struggled to find much hu­mor value in en­vir­on­ment­al­ism, but in scour­ing the In­ter­net we did find a few chest­nuts. Quoth Robin Wil­li­ams: “Clean coal is a bit like wear­ing a por­ous con­dom — at least the in­ten­tion was there.” Quoth Jay Leno: “Pres­id­ent Bush toured parts of Mis­souri that were dev­ast­ated by a re­cent tor­nado. There was one awk­ward mo­ment, when the pres­id­ent looked at the tor­nado dam­age and said, ‘Don’t worry, we’re go­ing to get who­ever did this.’ “

For the more lit­er­ary, there’s this mus­ing by Mark Twain: “Learn to ride a bi­cycle. You will not re­gret it if you live.” And this from Og­den Nash: “I think that I shall nev­er see/A bill­board lovely as a tree./In­deed, un­less the bill­boards fall,/I’ll nev­er see a tree at all.” And we’ll al­ways have Onion posts like this: “Sub­urb­an Re­cyc­ling Pro­gram Now Ac­cept­ing Broken and Dis­carded Dreams.”

Gaby sug­gests en­vir­on­ment­al hu­mor is at its best when act­iv­ists turn it in­ward and mock them­selves. “Every good politi­cian knows it’s more ef­fect­ive to tease your­self than to make fun of oth­ers,” he said. “So we al­most as a polit­ic­al tool need to re­cog­nize that it’s a little dis­arm­ing and makes more friends when you’re will­ing to laugh at your­self.”

On his blog for the En­vir­on­ment­al De­fense Fund he’s culled a few such jokes:

Q: How do elec­tric car own­ers drive?

A: One hand on the wheel, the oth­er pat­ting them­selves on the back.

Q: How do you know when you’re in the room with en­vir­on­ment­al­ists?

A: Don’t worry, they’ll let you know.

I asked him if he knew any oth­ers and he said he couldn’t re­mem­ber off­hand. “We need a sym­posi­um on de­vel­op­ing en­vir­on­ment­al jokes that we can then arm our act­iv­ists with as we go around the coun­try,” he joked. I think.

It wasn’t the only time his hu­mor had me second-guess­ing my­self. As I star­ted to get off the phone with him, I men­tioned that I thought self-de­prec­at­ing hu­mor could go a long way.

“Yeah, ab­so­lutely,” he replied. “It’s just hard when you’re try­ing to save the world you know, to take time out to do that.”

I laughed. Then stopped. Was he jok­ing?

What We're Following See More »
ANOTHER NUCLEAR OPTION?
Byrd Rule Could Trip Up Health Legislation
19 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”

Source:
ONE WEEK
Senate Votes To Fund Government
21 hours ago
BREAKING
ON TO SENATE
House Passes Spending Bill
22 hours ago
BREAKING

The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.

PRESIDENT CALLS MEDICAID FUNDS A “BAILOUT”
Puerto Rico Another Sticking Point in Budget Talks
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."

Source:
POTENTIAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN?
Democrats Threaten Spending Bill Over Obamacare
1 days ago
BREAKING

Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login