Democrats are furious with Republicans for refusing to extend unemployment insurance benefits. On Tuesday, they’ll take that fight to the next level — forcing their colleagues to stand face-to-face with some of the long-term unemployed who lost their benefits exactly one month earlier.
A cadre of House Democrats are organizing a sort of sit-in at the State of the Union with about 10 members each bringing an unemployed person from their districts as their plus-one. These guests will sit inside the House chamber, just feet from the Republican members who last month refused to include a short-term extension of the insurance program in the budget agreement.
Democratic Reps. Mark Pocan of Wisconsin and Alan Lowenthal of California organized the movement, urging colleagues to bring one of the long-term unemployed with them to the State of the Union on Tuesday. Rep. Sander Levin, D-Mich., who led the fight to extend unemployment benefits during December’s budget debate, has also signed on.
Pocan is bringing Brian Krueger of Mount Horeb, Wisc., with him. Krueger was laid off from his job as a steamfitter in June and has struggled over the last month to make mortgage payments. He and his wife have applied for food stamps and they’ve reduced lunches for their two children, according to Pocan’s office. Krueger has applied for two to three jobs every day, but has still not been able to find work.
More than 1 million Americans, many of whom had already been out of work for 26 weeks, lost their benefits on Dec. 28. That number has since climbed to 1.6 million people and continues to grow as Congress wrangles over the issue.
With both sides attempting to score political points, Congress seems far from reaching a solution. Democrats are pushing for an immediate, if short-term, extension of the program, while Republicans argue that an extension must be paid for. So far, Democrats have been reluctant to find offsets to fund the program, arguing that the expiration of unemployment insurance benefits constitutes an “emergency”.
In reality, the disagreement is an election-year winner for both sides, allowing Democrats to accuse Republicans of not caring for the poor and jobless, while Republicans say their opponents want to expand government without paying for it and continue to drive up the nation’s debt.
The presence of the long-term unemployed could have particular resonance during President Obama’s speech, which is expected to focus on income inequality and economic fairness.
What We're Following See More »
After more than a month of back and forth, a failed bill, and GOP embarrassment, the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus has announced that it will support the Obamacare replacement legislation in its most recent iteration. Rep. Mark Meadows, the chairman of the caucus, said the roughly 30 members of the caucus view this compromise as the best option short of a full repeal. A recent amendment, authored by Meadows and Rep. Tom McArthur, co-chair of the more moderate Tuesday Group, would allow states to apply for waivers exempting them from provisions forbidding insurers from charging higher prices to those with pre-existing conditions if the state set up a high-risk pool. The plan's passage in the House is not a done deal though, as a number of moderate lawmakers have resisted supporting the amendment.
"A U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer fired a warning flare toward an Iranian Revolutionary Guard vessel coming near it in the Persian Gulf. The incident happened Monday as the vessel closed to within 1,000 meters of the USS Mahan, "despite the destroyer trying to turn away from it." After attempting to contact the Iranian vessel and sounding its whistle, it deployed the flare. After that, the ship had had enough and turned away.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick's district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."