The Obama administration announced Monday that it will permit Internet companies to disclose government data requests for consumer information.
Attorney General Eric Holder and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper announced the policy change in a joint statement that the administration “is acting to allow more detailed disclosures about the number of national security orders and requests issued to communications providers, the number of customer accounts targeted under those orders and requests, and the underlying legal authorities.”
The data gleaned from national security orders had been classified until Monday, but the administration decided the “public interest in disclosing the information now outweighs the national security concerns that required its classification,” the statement said.
The policy change appears to be the result of negotiations brokered with key technology companies that had filed lawsuits against the federal government arguing they should be allowed to disclose more information about National Security Agency surveillance of their users.
“We filed our lawsuits because we believe that the public has a right to know about the volume and types of national security requests we receive,” Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Microsoft, and Yahoo responded in a joint statement obtained by National Journal. “We’re pleased the Department of Justice has agreed that we and other providers can disclose this information. While this is a very positive step, we’ll continue to encourage Congress to take additional steps to address all of the reforms we believe are needed.”
The government will allow companies to choose between two options when informing customers about data requests. The first option allows for the disclosure of the number of national security letters received, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act orders for content and “non-content,” and the number of customers whose data is targeted—all within “bands of 1,000” beginning with a range of 0 to 999. FISA and NSL numbers may be published every six months.
The second option allows companies to report data detailing the total number of “all national security process received” and customers targetered in a single number within a band of 250, beginning with a range of 0 to 249.
The administration said the new reporting methods are an important step that will help assuage concerns from communications providers and the public. Holder and Clapper’s letter also noted that “additional steps must be taken in order to fully implement the reforms directed by the president.”
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, welcomed the announcement, but added that “further changes still must be enacted into law by Congress.”
Alex Abdo, a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union, quickly hailed the decision as “a victory for transparency and a critical step toward reining in excessive government surveillance.”
What We're Following See More »
U.S. District Judge William Orrick Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from enforcing part of an executive order calling for the end of federal funding to so-called sanctuary cities. The decision was followed by a scathing rebuke from the White House, a precedent-breaking activity which with this White House has had no qualms. A White House statement called the decision an "egregious overreach by a single, unelected district judge." The statement was followed by an inaccurate Wednesday morning tweetstorm from Trump, which railed against the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. While Judge Orrick district falls within the jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, Orrick himself does not serve on the Ninth Circuit.
"House Republicans are circulating the text of an amendment to their ObamaCare replacement bill that they believe could bring many conservatives on board. According to legislative text of the amendment," drafted by Rep. Tom MacArthur (R-NJ), "the measure would allow states to apply for waivers to repeal one of ObamaCare’s core protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Conservatives argue the provision drives up premiums for healthy people, but Democrats—and many more moderate Republicans—warn it would spark a return to the days when insurance companies could charge sick people exorbitantly high premiums."
President Trump on Wednesday "will order a review of national monuments created over the past 20 years with an aim toward rescinding or resizing some of them—part of a broader push to reopen areas to drilling, mining, and other development." Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke told reporters on Tuesday said he'd be reviewing about 30 monuments.
"An emerging government funding deal would see Democrats agree to $15 billion in additional military funding in exchange for the GOP agreeing to fund healthcare subsidies, according to two congressional officials briefed on the talks. Facing a Friday deadline to pass a spending bill and avert a shutdown, Democrats are willing to go halfway to President Trump’s initial request of $30 billion in supplemental military funding."
The Michael Flynn story is not going away for the White House as it tries to refocus its attention. The White House has denied requests from the House Oversight Committee for information and documents regarding payments that the former national security adviser received from Russian state television station RT and Russian firms. House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz and ranking member Elijah Cummings also said that Flynn failed to report these payments on his security clearance application. White House legislative director Marc Short argued that the documents requested are either not in the possession of the White House or contain sensitive information he believes is not applicable to the committee's stated investigation.