In the State of the Union, President Obama used his bully pulpit to sell the recent deal world powers struck with Iran as a foreign policy breakthrough and a chance to avoid a future conflict, promised the end of this country’s longest war in Afghanistan, and urged Congress to close the Guantanamo Bay prison — again.
Even as Israel and some U.S. lawmakers criticize the interim deal with Iran as not being strict enough, Obama defended the agreement that rolled back parts of Tehran’s nuclear program “for the very first time in a decade.”
The president ramped up the pressure on members of Congress — including Democrats — who are seeking more sanctions against Iran as negotiations continue. Promising to veto those measures if they make it to his desk now, Obama said, “for the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed.” If that fails, all options, presumably including military action, are still on table. “I will be the first to call for more sanctions,” Obama said, “and stand ready to exercise all options to make sure Iran does not build a nuclear weapon.” This public promise may sway some of his critics.
Obama also touted his role as war-ender-in-chief. When he took office, nearly 180,000 Americans were serving in Iraq and Afghanistan; the war in Iraq is, of course, over, and with the formal end of combat operations in Afghanistan this year, “America’s longest war will finally be over.” Obama is considering leaving a small force of U.S. troops for narrow counter-terrorism and training missions — if such a deal can be reached with Afghanistan. Outgoing president Hamid Karzai has so far refused to sign the security agreement both countries already negotiated.
Obama stressed the need to close the Guantanamo Bay prison — a goal which has eluded him since the beginning of his presidency. “With the Afghan war ending, this needs to be the year Congress lifts the remaining restrictions on detainee transfers and we close the prison at Guantanamo Bay,” Obama said, “because we counter terrorism not just through intelligence and military action, but by remaining true to our Constitutional ideals, and setting an example for the rest of the world.” It actually could happen. The tide may be turning in his favor; the defense authorization bill Obama signed late last year relaxed restrictions on transferring detainees to the custody of foreign countries.
Obama didn’t talk much about Iraq, where the news that al-Qaida-linked militants took over cities hard won by U.S. troops during the long war broke the hearts of Marines who fought there. And he glossed over the status of the Syrian conflict, where the bloody civil war still rages and peace talks appear deadlocked. Obama did say the U.S. will “support the opposition that rejects the agenda of terrorist networks” and stressed the role of American diplomacy in convincing Syria to eliminate its stocks of chemical weapons— after the U.S. threatened to use military force.
What We're Following See More »
The Supreme Court announced "that it would consider a challenge to President Trump’s latest effort to limit travel from countries said to pose a threat to the nation’s security." The case concerns Trump's most recent attempt to make good on a campaign promise "tainted by religious animus" and only questionably justified by national security concerns. The decision to take the case, called Trump v. Hawaii, comes almost exactly a year after Trump issued the first travel ban. The ban under consideration affects Iran, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea.
Trump wants to move the two grants, the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas grant and the Drug Free Communities Act, to the Justice and Health and Human Services departments, respectively. This would result in a $300 million plus reduction in funding, about 95 percent of the cost of the Office of National Drug Control Policy. "'I’m baffled at the idea of cutting the office or reducing it significantly and taking away its programs in the middle of an epidemic,'" said Regina LaBelle, who served as ONDCP chief of staff during the Obama administration. This is the second time the Trump Administration has proposed gutting the agency.
A new report assembled by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington has identified more than 500 potential conflicts of interest in President Trump's first year. First, the report notes, Trump spent 122 days at his properties during his first year. He has been accompanied by 70 federal officials and 30 members of Congress. "Second, far from this signaled access to power being an empty promise, those who patronize President Trump’s businesses have, in fact, gained access to the president and his inner circle." Lastly, about 40 special interest groups and 11 foreign governments have held events at Trump properties.