What Obama and Snowden Share: A Nobel Peace Prize Nomination

The fugitive and leaker of NSA secrets was nominated for the coveted prize Wednesday.

Nobel Peace Prize laureate, President Barack Obama smiles on the podium with his diploma and gold medal during the Nobel ceremony at the City Hall in Oslo on December 10, 2009.
Jewel Samad/AFP/Getty Images
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
Jan. 29, 2014, 5:03 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama and Ed­ward Snowden don’t see eye to eye on much, but they have at least one thing in com­mon: Both have been nom­in­ated for the pres­ti­gi­ous No­bel Peace Prize.

Snorre Valen and Baard Ve­gar Sol­hjell, two mem­bers of Nor­way’s So­cial­ist Left Party, an­nounced on Face­book Wed­nes­day that they have nom­in­ated the former Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency con­tract­or for help­ing to re­store the bal­ance between na­tion­al se­cur­ity and in­di­vidu­al freedoms.

“Ed­ward Snowden has re­vealed the nature and tech­no­lo­gic­al prowess of mod­ern sur­veil­lance,” the pair wrote. “The level of soph­ist­ic­a­tion and depth of sur­veil­lance that cit­izens all over the world are sub­ject to has stunned us and stirred de­bate all over the world. By do­ing this, he has con­trib­uted crit­ic­al know­ledge about how mod­ern sur­veil­lance and in­tel­li­gence dir­ec­ted to­wards states and cit­izens is car­ried out.”

Yet even in an­noun­cing their nom­in­a­tion, the duo ad­mits that Snowden is a con­tro­ver­sial fig­ure whose ac­tions are not ne­ces­sar­ily en­tirely pure. There is “no doubt” Snowden “may have dam­aged the se­cur­ity in­terests of sev­er­al na­tions in the short term,” they said, adding they “do not ne­ces­sar­ily con­done or sup­port all of his dis­clos­ures.”

Des­pite such con­ces­sions, the nom­in­at­ors con­cluded:

“A coun­try’s le­git­im­ate need for re­li­able in­tel­li­gence to pre­serve its own se­cur­ity, must al­ways be bal­anced against the people’s in­di­vidu­al freedoms — and the glob­al need for trust — as an in­teg­ral con­di­tion for sta­bil­ity and peace. Ed­ward Snowden has made a crit­ic­al con­tri­bu­tion to restor­ing this bal­ance.”

The nom­in­a­tion fur­ther sug­gests that, des­pite the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s best ef­forts, de­bate over the prop­er size and scope of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance powers is here to stay in 2014. Earli­er this month, Obama enu­mer­ated sev­er­al NSA re­forms he hopes to com­plete in the com­ing months, but many pri­vacy ad­voc­ates were left un­sat­is­fied. Mean­while, Snowden-fueled leaks about “leaky” apps and the Brit­ish gov­ern­ment’s abil­ity to tap in­to cables trans­fer­ring in­ter­na­tion­al Web traffic con­tin­ued this week.

Snowden was also nom­in­ated for a No­bel Peace Prize last Ju­ly by a Swedish so­ci­ology pro­fess­or for show­ing “that in­di­vidu­als can stand up for fun­da­ment­al rights and freedoms.” That nom­in­a­tion, which came one month after ma­jor pub­lic­a­tions around the world began dis­clos­ing top-secret doc­u­ments about the NSA’s sur­veil­lance pro­grams be­stowed upon them by Snowden, was sub­mit­ted after the Feb. 1 dead­line, however.

The win­ner will not be an­nounced un­til the second week of Oc­to­ber, leav­ing us months to spec­u­late about what a Snowden ac­cept­ance speech in Oslo might look like.

In 2009, Obama won the prize, de­liv­er­ing a speech that fam­ously noted, “To say that force may some­times be ne­ces­sary is not a call to cyn­icism — it is a re­cog­ni­tion of his­tory; the im­per­fec­tions of man; and the lim­its of reas­on.”

“I be­gin with this point be­cause in many coun­tries there is a deep am­bi­val­ence about mil­it­ary ac­tion today, no mat­ter what the cause. And at times, this is joined by a re­flex­ive sus­pi­cion of Amer­ica, the world’s sole mil­it­ary su­per­power.”

Journ­al­ist and Snowden con­fid­ant Glenn Gre­en­wald shared his thoughts of the nom­in­a­tion on Twit­ter:

What We're Following See More »
WHO PLAYED THE DONALD?
Longtime Clinton Aide Played Trump in Mock Debates
0 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

After keeping the information private for most of the lead-up to the debate on Monday, it has been revealed that longtime Clinton aide Philippe Reines has been playing the role of Donald Trump in her debate prep. Reines knows Clinton better than most, able to identify both her strengths and weaknesses, and his selection for a sparring partner shows that Clinton is preparing for the brash and confrontational Donald Trump many have come to expect.

Source:
WEEKEND POLLING ROUNDUP
New Polls Still Show Razor-Thin Margins
5 minutes ago
THE LATEST
  • A national Washington Post/ABC News poll shows Clinton leading Trump by just two points among likely voters, 46% to 44%.
  • A national Bloomberg poll out Monday morning by Selzer & Co. has Clinton and Trump tied at 46% in a two-way race, and Trump ahead 43% to 41% in a four-way race.
  • A CNN/ORC poll in Colorado shows likely voters’ support for Trump at 42%, 41% for Clinton, and a CNN/ORC poll in Pennsylvania has Clinton at 45% and Trump at 44%.
  • A Portland Press Herald/UNH survey in Maine has Clinton leading Trump in ME-01 and Trump ahead in ME-02.
THE QUESTION
How Many Times Has the Trump Campaign Emailed Ted Cruz’s Supporters?
12 minutes ago
THE ANSWER

More than 30 times, in the case of some donors. Long before Cruz endorsed Trump—and before he even snubbed the nominee at the Republican National Convention—"the senator quietly began renting his vast donor email file to his former rival, pocketing at least tens of thousands of dollars, and more likely hundreds of thousands, that can be used to bankroll the Texan’s own political future."

Source:
STAKES ARE HIGH
Debate Could Sway One-Third of Voters
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found that 34% of registered voters think the three presidential debates would be extremely or quite important in helping them decide whom to support for president. About 11% of voters are considered 'debate persuadables'—that is, they think the debates are important and are either third-party voters or only loosely committed to either major-party candidate."

Source:
YOU DON’T BRING ME FLOWERS ANYMORE
Gennifer Flowers May Not Appear After All
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

Will he or won't he? That's the question surrounding Donald Trump and his on-again, off-again threats to bring onetime Bill Clinton paramour Gennifer Flowers to the debate as his guest. An assistant to flowers initially said she'd be there, but Trump campaign chief Kellyanne Conway "said on ABC’s 'This Week' that the Trump campaign had not invited Flowers to the debate, but she didn’t rule out the possibility of Flowers being in the audience."

Source:
×