What Obama and Snowden Share: A Nobel Peace Prize Nomination

The fugitive and leaker of NSA secrets was nominated for the coveted prize Wednesday.

Nobel Peace Prize laureate, President Barack Obama smiles on the podium with his diploma and gold medal during the Nobel ceremony at the City Hall in Oslo on December 10, 2009.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Jan. 29, 2014, 5:03 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama and Ed­ward Snowden don’t see eye to eye on much, but they have at least one thing in com­mon: Both have been nom­in­ated for the pres­ti­gi­ous No­bel Peace Prize.

Snorre Valen and Baard Ve­gar Sol­hjell, two mem­bers of Nor­way’s So­cial­ist Left Party, an­nounced on Face­book Wed­nes­day that they have nom­in­ated the former Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency con­tract­or for help­ing to re­store the bal­ance between na­tion­al se­cur­ity and in­di­vidu­al freedoms.

“Ed­ward Snowden has re­vealed the nature and tech­no­lo­gic­al prowess of mod­ern sur­veil­lance,” the pair wrote. “The level of soph­ist­ic­a­tion and depth of sur­veil­lance that cit­izens all over the world are sub­ject to has stunned us and stirred de­bate all over the world. By do­ing this, he has con­trib­uted crit­ic­al know­ledge about how mod­ern sur­veil­lance and in­tel­li­gence dir­ec­ted to­wards states and cit­izens is car­ried out.”

Yet even in an­noun­cing their nom­in­a­tion, the duo ad­mits that Snowden is a con­tro­ver­sial fig­ure whose ac­tions are not ne­ces­sar­ily en­tirely pure. There is “no doubt” Snowden “may have dam­aged the se­cur­ity in­terests of sev­er­al na­tions in the short term,” they said, adding they “do not ne­ces­sar­ily con­done or sup­port all of his dis­clos­ures.”

Des­pite such con­ces­sions, the nom­in­at­ors con­cluded:

“A coun­try’s le­git­im­ate need for re­li­able in­tel­li­gence to pre­serve its own se­cur­ity, must al­ways be bal­anced against the people’s in­di­vidu­al freedoms — and the glob­al need for trust — as an in­teg­ral con­di­tion for sta­bil­ity and peace. Ed­ward Snowden has made a crit­ic­al con­tri­bu­tion to restor­ing this bal­ance.”

The nom­in­a­tion fur­ther sug­gests that, des­pite the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s best ef­forts, de­bate over the prop­er size and scope of the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s sur­veil­lance powers is here to stay in 2014. Earli­er this month, Obama enu­mer­ated sev­er­al NSA re­forms he hopes to com­plete in the com­ing months, but many pri­vacy ad­voc­ates were left un­sat­is­fied. Mean­while, Snowden-fueled leaks about “leaky” apps and the Brit­ish gov­ern­ment’s abil­ity to tap in­to cables trans­fer­ring in­ter­na­tion­al Web traffic con­tin­ued this week.

Snowden was also nom­in­ated for a No­bel Peace Prize last Ju­ly by a Swedish so­ci­ology pro­fess­or for show­ing “that in­di­vidu­als can stand up for fun­da­ment­al rights and freedoms.” That nom­in­a­tion, which came one month after ma­jor pub­lic­a­tions around the world began dis­clos­ing top-secret doc­u­ments about the NSA’s sur­veil­lance pro­grams be­stowed upon them by Snowden, was sub­mit­ted after the Feb. 1 dead­line, however.

The win­ner will not be an­nounced un­til the second week of Oc­to­ber, leav­ing us months to spec­u­late about what a Snowden ac­cept­ance speech in Oslo might look like.

In 2009, Obama won the prize, de­liv­er­ing a speech that fam­ously noted, “To say that force may some­times be ne­ces­sary is not a call to cyn­icism — it is a re­cog­ni­tion of his­tory; the im­per­fec­tions of man; and the lim­its of reas­on.”

“I be­gin with this point be­cause in many coun­tries there is a deep am­bi­val­ence about mil­it­ary ac­tion today, no mat­ter what the cause. And at times, this is joined by a re­flex­ive sus­pi­cion of Amer­ica, the world’s sole mil­it­ary su­per­power.”

Journ­al­ist and Snowden con­fid­ant Glenn Gre­en­wald shared his thoughts of the nom­in­a­tion on Twit­ter:

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×