There’s a new poll out Thursday morning, and it confirms what Washington pundits have talked about for months and years: Hillary Clinton leads the Democratic field for president in 2016. Duh.
The headline for the Washington Post story on the poll reads, “For 2016, Hillary Clinton has commanding lead over Democrats.” What the headline doesn’t mention is that her lead is over two other Democrats named in the poll: Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts. None of the three has confirmed 2016 presidential aspirations.
Of course, Clinton leads the field. She is the most widely talked about “candidate” for president in 2016. But she hasn’t announced her candidacy, nor has she set up any committees.
Does this sound familiar?
Gallup took a similar poll around the same time out from the 2008 election, in February 2006. Clinton again led the Democratic field. She led over such eventual noncandidates as John Kerry, Al Gore, Mark Warner, and Russ Feingold. Eventual candidates John Edwards and Joe Biden were also included in the poll, though. Eventual winner Barack Obama was not.
There is, however, an important difference between the 2006 poll and the one released Thursday: Today, Clinton’s lead is much wider. She led her nearest “opponent” in the 2006, Kerry, by 39 percent to 15 percent. In the latest Washington Post/ABC News poll, Clinton leads Biden 73 percent to 12 percent.
And that’s partly because there are currently fewer viable candidates in the Democratic field. Who else could run? Beyond the three listed in the poll, one of whom — Warren — has already “endorsed” Clinton for 2016, there aren’t many more Democrats out there who seem willing to run just yet. Democratic governors like Maryland’s Martin O’Malley, New York’s Andrew Cuomo, and Massachusetts’ Deval Patrick have not hinted at campaigns, and their potential national appeal is pretty questionable at this point.
There could be other Democrats out there brave enough to stand up against the Clinton Machine, one of whom is former Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer. But it remains to be seen who else could join the field. And there is only so much time left.
So, we have yet another poll that shows Clinton leading the field. As Guy Cecil, executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, joked Thursday morning, “I love that old political adage: The only poll that counts is the one three years before the election.”
What We're Following See More »
"According to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult poll, the first national post-debate survey, 43 percent of registered voters said the Democratic candidate won, compared with 26 percent who opted for the Republican Party’s standard bearer. Her 6-point lead over Trump among likely voters is unchanged from our previous survey: Clinton still leads Trump 42 percent to 36 percent in the race for the White House, with Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson taking 9 percent of the vote."
After a lighthearted beginning, Donald Trump's appearance at the Al Smith charity dinner in New York "took a tough turn as the crowd repeatedly booed the GOP nominee for his sharp-edged jokes about his rival Hillary Clinton."
Evan McMullin came out on top in a Emerson College poll of Utah with 31% of the vote. Donald Trump came in second with 27%, while Hillary Clinton took third with 24%. Gary Johnson received 5% of the vote in the survey.
A new Quinnipiac University poll finds Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump by seven percentage points, 47%-40%. Trump’s “lead among men and white voters all but” vanished from the university’s early October poll. A new PPRI/Brookings survey shows a much bigger lead, with Clinton up 51%-36%. And an IBD/TIPP poll leans the other way, showing a virtual dead heat, with Trump taking 41% of the vote to Clinton’s 40% in a four-way matchup.