IBM, Microsoft, and Friends Renew Fight Against Patent-Troll Measure

The war over how to best exterminate patent trolls is reawakening from a brief cease-fire after President Obama called for reform in his State of the Union address.

A sign reading 'patent' has been put on a basket full of tomatoes during a protes staged by Greenpeace activists against food patents in front of the patent office in Munich, southern Germany, on July 20, 2010.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Dustin Volz
Jan. 30, 2014, 6:29 a.m.

A power­ful co­ali­tion of large tech firms and oth­er busi­ness stake­hold­ers are rising up once again in op­pos­i­tion to a con­ten­tious pat­ent-re­form pro­vi­sion, as the Sen­ate weighs a path for­ward on le­gis­la­tion to slay so-called pat­ent trolls.

BSA | The Soft­ware Al­li­ance and over a hun­dred oth­er groups sent a let­ter to lead­er­ship of the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee on Thursday warn­ing that ex­pan­sion of a pat­ent-re­view pro­gram housed at the Pat­ent and Trade­mark Of­fice will “hurt Amer­ica’s in­nov­at­ors — both small and large — and weak­en Amer­ica’s com­pet­it­ive ad­vant­age around the world, at a time when we can least af­ford it.”

The missive is en­dorsed by sev­er­al large tech firms, in­clud­ing IBM, Mi­crosoft, and Qual­comm, and it ar­rives a day be­fore Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary staffers are to sit down with key stake­hold­ers for a brief­ing on the meas­ure and oth­er pat­ent qual­ity is­sues, the third of four such edu­ca­tion­al meet­ings that have been sched­uled. Oth­er sig­nat­or­ies in­clude groups rep­res­ent­ing Amer­ic­an uni­versit­ies, tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions and phar­ma­ceut­ic­al com­pan­ies, and fin­an­cial ser­vices.

The pro­vi­sion, known to pat­ent wonks as “covered busi­ness meth­od” re­view, would ex­pand the pat­ent of­fice’s abil­ity to re­ject cer­tain in­fringe­ment claims made on low-qual­ity pat­ents. Cur­rently only fin­an­cial ser­vices pat­ents that are not tech­no­lo­gic­al in nature are eli­gible for such re­view, a mech­an­ism that was ad­op­ted with the pas­sage of the 2011 Amer­ica In­vents Act.

Many sup­port­ers of the re­view meth­od ex­pan­sion view it as the Ex­calibur ne­ces­sary to win the war against pat­ent trolls, the term du jour giv­en to com­pan­ies that pur­chase cheap pat­ents and use them for profit by fil­ing ques­tion­able in­fringe­ment law­suits, of­ten against small soft­ware star­tups that struggle to af­ford leg­al rep­res­ent­a­tion.

But BSA and oth­ers con­tend that al­low­ing the pat­ent of­fice to dis­card more pat­ents con­sidered poor in qual­ity over­cor­rects a sys­tem en­shrined in the Con­sti­tu­tion that has been the envy of the rest of the world for 200 years. Ex­pand­ing the re­view “would be to turn ill-ad­visedly and ir­re­voc­ably in a new dir­ec­tion — dis­crim­in­at­ing against an en­tire class of tech­no­logy in­nov­a­tion,” the groups write in their op­pos­i­tion let­ter.

Parts of the let­ter are nearly identic­al to one sent to the House Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee in Septem­ber, which led to the re­view ex­pan­sion’s even­tu­al re­mov­al by Chair­man Bob Good­latte, a Vir­gin­ia Re­pub­lic­an, in a man­ager’s amend­ment dur­ing the markup pro­cess. Good­latte ori­gin­ally favored the ex­pan­sion, but de­term­ined to get his In­nov­a­tion Act passed in 2013 and avoid a messy fight, he left the meas­ure on the cut­ting-room floor dur­ing com­mit­tee markup.

Good­latte quickly muscled his ed­ited In­nov­a­tion Act through the House, earn­ing a sweep­ing 325-91 vic­tory with strong sup­port from both parties. The om­ni­bus bill would re­quire plaintiffs to be more spe­cif­ic in pat­ent law­suits, in­crease trans­par­ency of pat­ent own­er­ship, re­duce the costs of dis­cov­ery and pro­tect end users, such as re­tail­ers or cof­fee shops. It ad­di­tion­ally makes it easi­er for those who suc­cess­fully de­fend them­selves against pat­ent trolls to re­cov­er leg­al costs, a pro­cess known as fee-shift­ing.

The let­ter touts its vic­tory in killing re­view meth­od ex­pan­ison in the House, not­ing that “the pro­vi­sion was re­moved [from the In­nov­a­tion Act] be­cause it had be­come clear that main­tain­ing the meas­ure was cre­at­ing a road­b­lock to passing any le­gis­la­tion. We be­lieve the same is true in the Sen­ate.

“Ex­pand­ing the CBM pro­gram is not just ill-ad­vised from a polit­ic­al stand­point, but from a policy per­spect­ive as well.”

Sen. Chuck Schu­mer has favored the CBM ex­pan­sion, in­tro­du­cing a bill last year that would al­low the re­view meth­od for all in­dus­tries and make it per­man­ent. In Decem­ber, the New York Demo­crat de­clared that “a pat­ent-re­form bill that does not ad­dress pat­ent qual­ity is like treat­ing the symp­tom in­stead of the dis­ease.”

“If any­one thinks they have val­id pat­ents, they shouldn’t be afraid of a pre­lim­in­ary pro­ceed­ing,” Schu­mer said dur­ing a Ju­di­ciary hear­ing ex­amin­ing pat­ent lit­ig­a­tion. “The only people who are afraid of this are those who know their pat­ents are in­val­id.”

Pat­ent-lit­ig­a­tion re­form is cap­tur­ing some re­newed in­terest in Wash­ing­ton after a brief lull fol­low­ing the pas­sage of the In­nov­a­tion Act. On Tues­day, Pres­id­ent Obama urged Con­gress to “pass a pat­ent re­form bill that al­lows our busi­nesses to stay fo­cused on in­nov­a­tion, not costly and need­less lit­ig­a­tion.”

Those 19 words may have been a fleet­ing nod to re­formers, but the pat­ent com­munity took it as a re­as­sur­ing sign that this time, at least, Con­gress and Obama agreed something needed to be done soon to curb the grow­ing ab­use of pat­ent trolling, which by some es­tim­ates cost the eco­nomy tens of bil­lions of dol­lars a year. The White House has en­dorsed Good­latte’s In­nov­a­tion Act and also urged ex­pan­sion of covered busi­ness meth­od re­view.

“It was a brief men­tion, but a strong men­tion,” said Mi­chael Beck­er­man, pres­id­ent and CEO of the In­ter­net As­so­ci­ation. “This does need to be on a little bit of a quick timeline, by Sen­ate stand­ards, be­cause this is an elec­tion year.”

Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, who res­ol­utely re­mained sit­ting with his arms fol­ded dur­ing much of the pres­id­ent’s speech, even leapt out of his seat to ap­plaud the call for pat­ent re­form.

Elahe Izad contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

SAYS THEY CHEATED TESTS
Government Sues Fiat Chrysler Over Emissions
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

The government alleges the company put eight “software-based features” on diesel engines in nearly 104,000 Ram pickups and Jeep Grand Cherokees from the 2014 to 2016 model years, which allowed the vehicles to emit fewer pollutants during EPA lab tests than during normal driving conditions.

Source:
KEY ON TRUMPCARE
MacArthur Resigns As Tuesday Group Co-Chair
11 hours ago
BREAKING

Rep. Tom MacArthur resigned Tuesday from his position as co-chair of the Tuesday Group, the House caucus of more moderate GOP members. MacArthur was one of the key engineers in getting an Obamacare replacement plan passed through the House of Representatives, which has caused a rift within the Tuesday Group. "You can't lead people where they don't want to go," MacArthur told POLITICO New Jersey. "I think some people in the group just have a different view of what governing is."

Source:
DETAILS ARE CLASSIFIED
Brennan Saw Russia Intelligence “Worthy” of Investigation
12 hours ago
THE LATEST

At an open hearing of the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA chief John Brennan said he saw information on Trump-Russia contacts that were worth a further look. "Having been involved in many counterintelligence cases in the past, I know what the Russians do. They try to suborn individuals," Brennan said. "And they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, whether wittingly or unwittingly. And I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons, and so therefore by the time I left office ... I had unresolved questions in my mind."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login