6 Conclusions From the Chris Christie Bridgegate Report

The governor’s office published an account of the George Washington Bridge scandal, clearing his name.

National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros and Brian Resnick
Add to Briefcase
Matt Vasilogambros and Brian Resnick
March 27, 2014, 8:21 a.m.

Chris Christie’s name was cleared in the bridge-clos­ing scan­dal that rocked his of­fice, ac­cord­ing to an in­tern­al in­vest­ig­a­tion com­mis­sioned by the New Jer­sey gov­ernor’s of­fice.

Most sig­ni­fic­antly, for Christie, the 300-plus page re­ports con­cludes, “Our ex­am­in­a­tion of emails, text mes­sages, phone re­cords, and oth­er doc­u­ments found no evid­ence that the gov­ernor had know­ledge of the lane re­align­ment dur­ing its im­ple­ment­a­tion.”

However, the re­port does state that Dav­id Wild­stein, the former Port Au­thor­ity of­fi­cial who or­ches­trated the lane clos­ures, said he told Christie about the traffic is­sue at a pub­lic event while the clos­ures were hap­pen­ing. But Christie said that he did not re­call the in­ter­ac­tion.

Randy Mas­tro, the law­yer who led the in­tern­al in­vest­ig­a­tion, said there was “not a shred of evid­ence” that Christie knew of the scan­dal. “Our find­ings today are a vin­dic­a­tion of Gov. Christie,” Mas­tro said.

Since this was an in­tern­al in­vest­ig­a­tion, Mas­tro had to de­fend the ob­jectiv­ity of the find­ings. At a press con­fer­ence Thursday, he said that be­cause he was hired by the gov­ernor’s of­fice and not by the gov­ernor him­self, there was enough sep­ar­a­tion for in­de­pend­ence.

Here are the main con­clu­sions from the re­port:

Hoboken may­or’s claim that Christie with­held Sandy money for polit­ic­al lever­age is un­foun­ded.

In sum, our in­vest­ig­a­tion has con­cluded that May­or Zi­m­mer’s al­leg­a­tions are un­sub­stan­ti­ated and, in ma­ter­i­al re­spects, demon­strably false. Whatever sub­ject­ive per­cep­tions she may have do not match ob­ject­ive real­ity, as re­flec­ted in the hard evid­ence un­covered dur­ing our in­vest­ig­a­tion. Moreover, her al­leg­a­tions are con­tra­dicted by con­tem­por­an­eous doc­u­ments, oth­er wit­nesses’ ac­counts, and her own pri­or state­ments. May­or Zi­m­mer her­self has called the se­quence of events that she has al­leged “un­be­liev­able.”162 Based on our in­vest­ig­a­tion, we would have to agree.

Em­ploy­ees of the Gov­ernor’s of­fice should use work email for com­mu­nic­a­tions, not per­son­al email, as Brid­get Kelly and Dav­id Wild­stein used to dis­cuss the lane clos­ures.

Ab­sent ex­traordin­ary cir­cum­stances, pub­lic em­ploy­ees work­ing in trus­ted po­s­i­tions should use their of­fi­cial state email ac­counts when con­duct­ing state busi­ness. As a mat­ter of trans­par­ency, ac­count­ab­il­ity, and pub­lic ac­cess, that is the prudent and re­spons­ible thing to do.

Elim­in­ate the In­ter­gov­ern­ment­al Af­fairs (IGA) of­fice that Brid­get Kelly ran. 

It ap­peared to have func­tioned very ef­fect­ively dur­ing the first three years of the Gov­ernor’s first term, both in terms of re­spons­ive­ness and non-par­tis­an­ship. But then, dur­ing the Gov­ernor’s re-elec­tion year, un­der Kelly’s stew­ard­ship, there was ab­er­ra­tion­al be­ha­vi­or at Kelly’s dir­ec­tion. While this ab­er­ra­tion­al con­duct was isol­ated, it has led to mis­un­der­stand­ings that have cre­ated ap­pear­ance is­sues for IGA go­ing for­ward.

Ap­point an om­bud­sper­son (pub­lic ad­voc­ate) to the gov­ernor’s of­fice

To as­sist the Gov­ernor’s Of­fice go­ing for­ward, and to re­store pub­lic trust in the many hon­or­able, ded­ic­ated pub­lic ser­vants who work there, we pro­pose that the Gov­ernor ap­point an Om­bud­sper­son — a seni­or states­per­son of un­ques­tioned in­teg­rity and in­de­pend­ence — to serve as a sound­ing board and re­source read­ily avail­able for re­ceiv­ing com­plaints with­in the Gov­ernor’s Of­fice and see­ing that they get ap­pro­pri­ately re­spon­ded to.

Re­form the Port Au­thor­ity via a bi-state com­mis­sion with New York.

This Bi-State Com­mis­sion should be tasked to for­mu­late a re­form agenda to re­struc­ture the Port Au­thor­ity to en­sure its in­de­pend­ence and pro­fes­sion­al­ism go­ing for­ward. As the George Wash­ing­ton Bridge in­cid­ent demon­strates, di­vi­sions between the Port Au­thor­ity’s New Jer­sey and New York coun­ter­parts have his­tor­ic­ally res­ul­ted in com­mu­nic­a­tion fail­ures, rival­ries, and du­plic­a­tion. …

the cur­rent ap­point­ments struc­ture — whereby one Gov­ernor ap­points the Chair (and Deputy Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or) and the oth­er Gov­ernor ap­points the Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or (and Vice Chair) — only ex­acer­bates that di­vi­sion and, at times, leads to dys­func­tion.

If the Hoboken may­or’s claims were cred­ible, she should have re­por­ted them to law en­force­ment.

The Gov­ernor should con­sider tak­ing steps to re­quire all State and loc­al elec­ted of­fi­cials, and per­haps their most seni­or staffers or cab­in­et-level ap­pointees, to timely re­port to law en­force­ment au­thor­it­ies, or the in­spect­ors gen­er­al or chief eth­ics of­ficers re­spons­ible for such over­sight, any con­duct that they be­lieve may con­sti­tute crimes be­ing com­mit­ted on their watch, and im­pos­ing ap­pro­pri­ate rem­ed­ies on those pub­lic of­fi­cials who fail to timely re­port such al­leg­a­tions. This would en­sure timely re­port­ing and in­vest­ig­a­tion of any such al­leg­a­tions. And it would ad­dress the ques­tions that ne­ces­sar­ily arise about the mo­tiv­a­tions and vera­city be­hind al­leg­a­tions such as May­or Zi­m­mer’s that are only first pub­licly made long after the fact. 

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CONTINUES TO LAWYER UP
Kasowitz Out, John Dowd In
2 days ago
THE LATEST

As the Russia investigation heats up, "the role of Marc E. Kasowitz, the president’s longtime New York lawyer, will be significantly reduced. Mr. Trump liked Mr. Kasowitz’s blunt, aggressive style, but he was not a natural fit in the delicate, politically charged criminal investigation. The veteran Washington defense lawyer John Dowd will take the lead in representing Mr. Trump for the Russia inquiry."

Source:
ALSO INQUIRES ABOUT PARDON POWER
Trump Looking to Discredit Mueller
2 days ago
THE LATEST

President Trump's attorneys are "actively compiling a list of Mueller’s alleged potential conflicts of interest, which they say could serve as a way to stymie his work." They plan to argued that Mueller is going outside the scope of his investigation, in inquiring into Trump's finances. They're also playing small ball, highlighting "donations to Democrats by some of" Mueller's team, and "an allegation that Mueller and Trump National Golf Club in Northern Virginia had a dispute over membership fees when Mueller resigned as a member in 2011." Trump is said to be incensed that Mueller may see his tax returns, and has been asking about his power to pardon his family members.

Source:
INCLUDES NY PROBE INTO MANAFORT
Why Yes, Mueller Is Looking into Trump Businesses
2 days ago
THE LATEST

In addition to ties between Russia and the Trump campaign, Robert Mueller's team is also "examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates, according to a person familiar with the probe. FBI investigators and others are looking at Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development in New York with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow, and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008, the person said. The investigation also has absorbed a money-laundering probe begun by federal prosecutors in New York into Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort."

Source:
Mueller Expands Probe to Trump Business Transactions
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team is "is examining a broad range of transactions involving Trump’s businesses as well as those of his associates", including "Russian purchases of apartments in Trump buildings, Trump’s involvement in a controversial SoHo development with Russian associates, the 2013 Miss Universe pageant in Moscow and Trump’s sale of a Florida mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008."

Source:
ANALYSIS FROM CBO
32 Million More Uninsured by 2026 if Obamacare Repealed
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"A Senate bill to gut Obamacare would increase the number of uninsured people by 32 million and double premiums on Obamacare's exchanges by 2026, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The analysis is of a bill that passed Congress in 2015 that would repeal Obamacare's taxes and some of the mandates. Republicans intend to leave Obamacare in place for two years while a replacement is crafted and implemented."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login