Senator Threatens to Sue Nuclear Agency Over Withheld Documents

Barbara Boxer (D-CA) chairs a meeting of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on January 14, 2009.
National Journal
Douglas P. Guarino
Add to Briefcase
Douglas P. Guarino
Jan. 30, 2014, 10:03 a.m.

Sen­at­or Bar­bara Box­er (D-Cal­if.) is threat­en­ing to sue the U.S. Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion for with­hold­ing in­form­a­tion re­lated to a now-de­funct nuc­le­ar power plant that law­makers and watch­dog groups feared was a se­cur­ity risk.

South­ern Cali­for­nia Edis­on de­cided last year to per­man­ently close the San Ono­fre nuc­le­ar power plant in Box­er’s home state after the sen­at­or raised con­cerns about dam­aged steam gen­er­at­ors that act­iv­ists said made the site vul­ner­able to sab­ot­age. The law­maker has de­man­ded to get to the bot­tom of how de­fect­ive tech­no­lo­gies were per­mit­ted to be fielded from the out­set.

NRC Chair­wo­man Al­lis­on Mac­far­lane in Novem­ber denied Box­er’s claims that the agency was with­hold­ing in­form­a­tion from the law­maker. But Box­er pushed back dur­ing a Thursday hear­ing, say­ing the com­mis­sion had yet to provide all the doc­u­ments she re­ques­ted.

“Maybe we have to go to court, maybe we have to sue you,” Box­er told Mac­far­lane and the four oth­er pres­id­en­tially ap­poin­ted com­mis­sion­ers. “I will get this in­form­a­tion even if I have to go to whis­tleblowers.”

Box­er chas­tised the com­mis­sion­ers, say­ing NRC of­fi­cials had said “very sweetly” that they would provide all the in­form­a­tion she re­ques­ted, and then later presen­ted a “phony leg­al ar­gu­ment” claim­ing they were not re­quired to do so.

The con­cern re­gard­ing the plant in­volved re­place­ment steam gen­er­at­ors — a key part of re­act­ors’ cool­ing sys­tems — that had been in­stalled at the San Ono­fre plant. A tube in one San Ono­fre re­act­or’s re­place­ment steam gen­er­at­or had burst, while an­oth­er was found to have hun­dreds of dam­aged tubes.

Act­iv­ists ar­gued that these flaws would make it easi­er for a ter­ror­ist to sab­ot­age the plant and cause a melt­down, par­tic­u­larly if an at­tack res­ul­ted in break­ing the re­act­or’s main steam line.

Box­er, who chairs the Sen­ate En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee, said “we do not yet have all the an­swers to how that dis­astrous situ­ation [at the San Ono­fre plant] oc­curred.” She said it was un­clear why NRC of­fi­cials per­mit­ted the flawed equip­ment to be in­stalled in the first place and that the in­form­a­tion she was seek­ing “will provide les­sons-learned for the com­mis­sion’s fu­ture safety de­cision-mak­ing activ­it­ies.”

Ac­cord­ing to the sen­at­or, the com­mis­sion in­tro­duced a new policy lim­it­ing the dis­tri­bu­tion of non-pub­lic in­form­a­tion to mem­bers of Con­gress last year, prompt­ing law­makers to over­turn the policy as part of ap­pro­pri­ations le­gis­la­tion ap­proved this month.

Box­er slammed the fed­er­al com­mis­sion for not act­ing in a trans­par­ent man­ner gen­er­ally, and com­plained that the agency also was not re­leas­ing in­form­a­tion per­tain­ing to how it jus­ti­fies its travel budget. She ex­pressed sup­port for NRC of­fi­cials vis­it­ing cer­tain des­tin­a­tions — such as Ja­pan, the site of the 2011 Fukushi­ma dis­aster.

However, oth­er des­tin­a­tions to which NRC of­fi­cials had traveled “look fun to go to,” but it is un­clear why they were ne­ces­sary, she said.

Box­er said she would con­tin­ue to press the is­sue at an­oth­er hear­ing “real soon.” In the next ses­sion, she prom­ised also to grill the com­mis­sion­ers re­gard­ing their de­cision to con­duct cost-be­ne­fit ana­lyses of vari­ous ac­tions NRC staff had re­com­men­ded that the U.S. in­dustry be re­quired to take to en­sure their fa­cil­it­ies don’t ex­per­i­ence a Fukushi­ma-type dis­aster.

The Cali­for­nia sen­at­or ar­gued the ana­lyses were un­ne­ces­sary, and that the wide scope of the dev­ast­a­tion the Fukushi­ma in­cid­ent caused in Ja­pan had provided enough jus­ti­fic­a­tion for the pre­vent­at­ive meas­ures to be taken at U.S. fa­cil­it­ies. She said the NRC stud­ies had caused the agency to fall be­hind sched­ule in terms of im­ple­ment­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions.

In some cases, the com­mis­sion has op­ted not to make cer­tain re­quire­ments of the power in­dustry on the grounds that the prob­ab­il­ity of events oc­cur­ing that would re­quire such pro­tec­tions was low.

However, Box­er said it would be im­prop­er for the agency to de­cide against im­ple­ment­ing the re­com­mend­a­tions on such a basis. She said the 2001 at­tacks on New York and Wash­ing­ton, along with re­cent cata­stroph­ic weath­er events, had shown that the un­ex­pec­ted can oc­cur.

“You can all say it will nev­er hap­pen here but “¦ we are just not that power­ful,” Box­er said. “We’re humble.”

What We're Following See More »
CITES CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Lieberman Withdraws from Consideration for FBI Job
4 days ago
THE LATEST
MINIMUM 2 PERCENT GDP
Trump Tells NATO Countries To Pay Up
4 days ago
BREAKING
MANAFORT AND FLYNN
Russians Discussed Influencing Trump Through Aides
4 days ago
THE DETAILS

"American spies collected information last summer revealing that senior Russian intelligence and political officials were discussing how to exert influence over Donald J. Trump through his advisers." The conversations centered around Paul Manafort, who was campaign chairman at the time, and Michael Flynn, former national security adviser and then a close campaign surrogate. Both men have been tied heavily with Russia and Flynn is currently at the center of the FBI investigation into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

Source:
BUT WHITE HOUSE MAY USE AGAINST HIM ANYWAY
Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
6 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Source:
BUSINESSES CAN’T PLEAD FIFTH
Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
6 days ago
THE LATEST

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login