Stick a Fork in Chris Christie

If the New Jersey governor wasn’t truthful in his press conference, he can wave goodbye to any presidential aspirations.

TRENTON, NJ - JANUARY 9: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks about his knowledge of a traffic study that snarled traffic at the George Washington Bridge during a news conference on January 9, 2014 at the Statehouse in Trenton, New Jersey. According to reports Christie's Deputy Chief of Staff Bridget Anne Kelly is accused of giving a signal to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to close lanes on the George Washington Bridge, allegedly as punishment for the Fort Lee, New Jersey mayor not endorsing the Governor during the election. 
Getty Images
Josh Kraushaar
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Josh Kraushaar
Jan. 31, 2014, 11:58 a.m.

If Chris Christie knew, his pres­id­en­tial am­bi­tions are kaput.

There’s a reas­on why nearly every­one who came to Christie’s de­fense left a wide-open caveat — if he’s telling the truth. Fri­day’s al­leg­a­tion that Christie knew about the George Wash­ing­ton Bridge lane clos­ures, com­ing from the law­yer for his Port Au­thor­ity of­fi­cial, Dav­id Wild­stein, sug­gests he was ly­ing dur­ing his epic two-hour press con­fer­ence by claim­ing no know­ledge of the situ­ation.

“Christie would have to be the world’s biggest fool to say what he said in the way he said it if he did have any re­spons­ib­il­ity,” former George W. Bush spokes­man Ari Fleis­cher told me after the gov­ernor’s press con­fer­ence. “If there’s any­thing that con­tra­dicts what he said at the press con­fer­ence, it would make it al­most im­possible for him to sur­vive.”

One Demo­crat­ic op­er­at­ive who was al­ways skep­tic­al of Christie’s out­right deni­als poin­ted to oth­er fam­ous politi­cians caught in scan­dal who lied in or­der to fore­stall im­me­di­ate con­sequences. Bill Clin­ton lied about Mon­ica Lew­in­sky, John Ed­wards lied about his af­fair and child with staffer Ri­elle Hunter, and An­thony Wein­er misled re­port­ers about his on­line sex­ting. All hoped to buy time, des­per­ately wish­ing that the me­dia would turn its scru­tiny else­where.

If Wild­stein’s al­leg­a­tions are ac­cur­ate — he’s seek­ing im­munity from pro­sec­utors for his own role in the scan­dal — Christie’s cov­er-up will be even more brazen. A former U.S. at­tor­ney, Christie is fully aware of the leg­al jeop­ardy he put him­self in­to with un­equi­voc­al deni­als of in­volve­ment, all for only a short-term pub­lic-re­la­tions gain. He fired two of his closest loy­al­ists, even though they may have been act­ing on his or­ders — or at least with his con­sent — all along.

Christie’s ap­prov­al rat­ings were already tak­ing a nose­dive even be­fore Fri­day af­ter­noon’s rev­el­a­tions hit. His per­son­al fa­vor­ab­il­ity in both na­tion­al and New Jer­sey polls dropped un­der­wa­ter, and in­creas­ing num­bers of voters have ex­pressed skep­ti­cism that Christie knew noth­ing about what was hap­pen­ing un­der him. His main selling point for any pres­id­en­tial cam­paign was elect­ab­il­ity — that he was pop­u­lar with in­de­pend­ents and some Demo­crats — and that is no longer op­er­at­ive, even if he can re­cov­er from this scan­dal.

De­pend­ing on where the evid­ence leads, there are a lot of oth­er polit­ic­al im­plic­a­tions for the New Jer­sey gov­ernor. Can Christie stay on as chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Gov­ernors As­so­ci­ation un­der the cloud of scan­dal? Re­pub­lic­ans, already fa­cing a bruised brand, won’t want to have a scan­dal-plagued gov­ernor as the face of their party. It’s hard to see even the most en­thu­si­ast­ic pro­spect­ive donors, like Home De­pot cofounder Ken Lan­gone, stick­ing on the band­wag­on. And it’s hard to see how Christie will be able to ac­com­plish much in his second term with in­vest­ig­a­tions poised to con­tin­ue in­def­in­itely.

Christie’s down­fall is a text­book les­son in how many politi­cians’ pub­lic per­so­nas of­ten con­flict with real­ity. Christie has as­sidu­ously de­veloped an im­age as someone who was above polit­ics to get things done, but in real­ity, he was a product of a New Jer­sey polit­ic­al sys­tem where trad­ing fa­vors for polit­ic­al sup­port is ubi­quit­ous.

As I wrote this month, Christie’s down­fall stems from his hubris — the be­lief that he could win over many Demo­crat­ic of­fi­cials to a land­slide reelec­tion vic­tory, and his con­fid­ence that he could use his im­press­ive rhet­or­ic­al skills to talk his way out of this mess. On both counts, he got what he wanted ini­tially, only to see the house of cards col­lapse.

What We're Following See More »
DOCUMENTS OBTAINED BY U.S. INTEL
Putin-Linked Think Tank Developed Plan to Influence U.S. Election
2 days ago
THE LATEST

A Russian government think tank run by Putin loyalists "developed a plan to swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election to Donald Trump and undermine voters’ faith in the American electoral system." Two confidential documents from the Putin-backed Institute for Strategic Studies, obtained by U.S. intelligence, provide "the framework and rationale for what U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded was an intensive effort by Russia to interfere with the Nov. 8 election."

Source:
HELPED WIN FISA APPROVAL
FBI Relied on Dossier Allegations to Monitor Page
3 days ago
THE LATEST

"The FBI last year used a dossier of allegations of Russian ties to Donald Trump's campaign as part of the justification" to monitor Carter Page, who was then a defense adviser to the Trump campaign. "The dossier has also been cited by FBI Director James Comey in some of his briefings to members of Congress in recent weeks."

Source:
AIR FORCE SCRAMBLES JETS IN RESPONSE
Russian Bombers Fly Near Alaska
4 days ago
WHY WE CARE
A MESSAGE TO RUSSIA?
Pentagon Deploying F-35s to Europe
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"The Air Force is set to deploy its high-tech, fifth-generation F-35A fighter jets to Europe this weekend as part of an effort to assure U.S. allies there who are worried about Russian aggression." The new, state-of-the-art fighters will train with European air units. "The Pentagon noted that the deployment had been long planned, meaning it was not a reaction to recent increasing tensions between the United States and Russia," although a statement noted the move is part of the "European Reassurance Initiative," which began three years ago when Russia annexed Crimea.

Source:
NOT ON SCHEDULE
Tillerson Meets Putin
1 weeks ago
BREAKING
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login