Will the Blumenthal Benghazi Deposition Ever Be Public?

Democrats want the full transcript of the Clinton ally’s appearance released, but so far Republicans haven’t agreed.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 16: House Select Committee on BenghaziChairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speaks to reporters before a closed door meeting in the House Visitors Center at the U.S. Capitol June 16, 2015 in Washington, DC. The committee is expected to question Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime advisor to former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, about communication he had with Hillary Clinton around the time of the Sept. 11, 2011 attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
National Journal
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Ben Geman
June 17, 2015, 10 a.m.

Demo­crats on the House Se­lect Com­mit­tee on Benghazi pan­el are wield­ing GOP Chair­man Trey Gowdy’s own words as a weapon in their push for Re­pub­lic­ans to re­lease the tran­script of Sid­ney Blu­menth­al’s mara­thon Tues­day de­pos­ition.

They’re brist­ling at Gowdy’s plan to re­lease newly un­covered emails about Libya between Blu­menth­al and Hil­lary Clin­ton when she was sec­ret­ary of State, ar­guing the tran­script should be made pub­lic to con­tex­tu­al­ize the mes­sages and provide back­ground.

In a let­ter Wed­nes­day, the pan­el’s five Demo­crats poin­ted to Gowdy’s March com­ments in op­pos­i­tion to re­leas­ing Clin­ton’s Libya-re­lated emails that the com­mit­tee had ob­tained from the State De­part­ment (the de­part­ment re­leased them last month).

“Giv­en your own words on this top­ic warn­ing against the se­lect­ive re­lease of in­form­a­tion from the Com­mit­tee’s in­vest­ig­a­tion, it has be­come im­possible to un­der­stand your re­volving policy on when the Se­lect Com­mit­tee will re­lease in­form­a­tion and when it will not,” the let­ter states.

The Demo­crats cite Gowdy’s re­mark at a March press con­fer­ence about Clin­ton’s use of a private email serv­er, when he said, “The danger whenev­er you se­lect­ively re­lease or leak in­form­a­tion is you give a dis­pro­por­tion­ate amount of at­ten­tion and im­port­ance to whatever you’ve leaked, which is why we don’t do it.”

Wed­nes­day’s Demo­crat­ic let­ter states: “Rather than se­lect­ively leak­ing only cer­tain in­form­a­tion about Mr. Blu­menth­al, the Amer­ic­an people de­serve the be­ne­fit of Mr. Blu­menth­al’s re­sponses to the hun­dreds of ques­tions that you and oth­er Se­lect Com­mit­tee Mem­bers asked him, in­clud­ing ques­tions about these same emails.”

Blu­menth­al, a long­time ally of the Clin­tons, sent a suite of lengthy memos to Hil­lary Clin­ton with in­tel­li­gence in­form­a­tion about Libya in 2011 and 2012.

On the eve of his de­pos­ition, Re­pub­lic­ans on the com­mit­tee re­vealed that Blu­menth­al had provided the pan­el with roughly 60 emails that wer­en’t part of Clin­ton’s Libya-re­lated emails that the State De­part­ment turned over to the com­mit­tee early this year.

Gowdy told re­port­ers on Tues­day that he would con­sider rank­ing Demo­crat Eli­jah Cum­mings’ call for re­lease of the de­pos­ition tran­script. But he noted that the tran­scripts of in­ter­views with oth­er wit­nesses who have ap­peared in private in the probe have not been re­leased.

“I will give Mr. Cum­mings an op­por­tun­ity to con­vince me … that we should treat this wit­ness dif­fer­ently than the way we have treated every oth­er wit­ness,” Gowdy said Tues­day in the Cap­it­ol.

Blu­menth­al, however, is the first per­son to be de­posed by the pan­el prob­ing the 2012 at­tacks on a dip­lo­mat­ic com­pound and CIA fa­cil­ity that killed Amb. Chris Stevens and three oth­er Amer­ic­ans. Last month, Re­pub­lic­ans served Blu­menth­al a sub­poena com­pel­ling his testi­mony.

“The fact of the mat­ter is that you are the one treat­ing Mr. Blu­menth­al dif­fer­ently,” the let­ter states, adding: “You are the one who forced Mr. Blu­menth­al to ap­pear at a man­dat­ory de­pos­ition — the only one the Se­lect Com­mit­tee has held in the year since it was es­tab­lished — rather than a vol­un­tary tran­scribed in­ter­view like every in­di­vidu­al be­fore him.”

What We're Following See More »
Congressional Budget Office Scores House Trumpcare Bill
8 hours ago

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its score of the House-passed American Health Care Act, which would replace Obamacare. According to the CBO, the bill would reduce the deficit by $119 billion by 2026, while leaving 14 million more Americans uninsured in 2018 than under current law, a number swelling to 23 million by 2026. Further, insurance premiums would balloon 20 percent in 2018 and five percent in 2019 before the waiver provision in the legislation would kick in. The provision allows states to apply for waivers and permit insurers to offer skimpier plans, which would likely entice younger and healthier individuals to buy health insurance while potentially pricing older and less healthy Americans out of insurance plans. House Republicans approved this bill in late April without waiting for the CBO score.

Graham Rejects Trump’s Budget In Hearing
8 hours ago

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Wednesday during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that President Donald Trump's budget is little more than recycling bin material. "The budget proposed by the president doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing," Graham said. Graham had previously opposed the budget over its nearly 30 percent cut to the budget of the State Department. The budget slashes spending on domestic priorities while increasing military spending.

Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
1 days ago

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
1 days ago

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

Brennan Saw Russia Intelligence “Worthy” of Investigation
1 days ago

At an open hearing of the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA chief John Brennan said he saw information on Trump-Russia contacts that were worth a further look. "Having been involved in many counterintelligence cases in the past, I know what the Russians do. They try to suborn individuals," Brennan said. "And they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, whether wittingly or unwittingly. And I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons, and so therefore by the time I left office ... I had unresolved questions in my mind."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.