Americans for Prosperity’s Ad Blitz Isn’t Risk-Free For GOP

The policy agenda of a deep-pocketed conservative outside group could complicate its efforts to help Republican candidates.

WASHINGTON - MARCH 18: Rep. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) (2nd L) and members of the GOP Doctors Caucus hold a news conference at the U.S. Capitol March 18, 2010 in Washington, DC. All the members of the caucus said they oppose the health care reform legislation, calling it dishonest and bad for doctors.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
Feb. 4, 2014, 7:05 a.m.

Amer­ic­ans for Prosper­ity has been a bless­ing for Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates. But the GOP’s top con­tenders might yet find their fa­vor­ite out­side group can also present a chal­len­ging di­lemma.

Take Louisi­ana, where the Koch-af­fil­i­ated AFP has spent more than $3 mil­lion on TV ads aimed at Demo­crat­ic Sen. Mary Landrieu. The state’s con­gres­sion­al del­eg­a­tion ““ in­clud­ing Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate can­did­ate, Rep. Bill Cas­sidy ““ sup­port a four-year delay in in­creases to premi­ums in the Na­tion­al Flood In­sur­ance Pro­gram, which cov­ers more than a half-mil­lion Louisi­ana res­id­ents. A bill to do just that passed the Sen­ate last week and now awaits ac­tion in the House.

But AFP, which de­vel­ops its own ro­bust policy agenda, staunchly op­poses a delay. And Demo­crats are seiz­ing on its op­pos­i­tion to at­tack both the non-profit or­gan­iz­a­tion and Cas­sidy.

“Un­for­tu­nately this is only the latest ex­ample of the Koch broth­ers’ anti-Louisi­ana agenda,” said An­drew Zuck­er, spokes­man for the state Demo­crat­ic Party, in a state­ment shared with Na­tion­al Journ­al Hot­line. “Their ef­forts to kill bi­par­tis­an flood in­sur­ance re­form are yet an­oth­er reas­on why Louisi­ani­ans shouldn’t trust the mil­lions of dol­lars worth of false at­tack ads they have launched against Sen. Landrieu.”

In a re­lease, Zuck­er high­lighted Cas­sidy’s own con­nec­tion to AFP, in­clud­ing a video of the con­gress­man at­tend­ing one of the group’s events and thank­ing a staffer for its help in his Sen­ate cam­paign.

Cas­sidy has offered the delay le­gis­la­tion his un­equi­voc­al back­ing, telling the New Or­leans Ad­voc­ate last year that his sup­port was “about do­ing something right by Amer­ic­an fam­il­ies.” But in polit­ics, some­times guilt by as­so­ci­ation can be enough to make an im­pres­sion on voters.

The con­gress­man’s di­lemma is in­dic­at­ive of the unique chal­lenges presen­ted by AFP. Un­like groups which only are con­cerned with elect­ing Re­pub­lic­ans, AFP is primar­ily con­cerned about its con­ser­vat­ive policy pri­or­it­ies, and back­ing can­did­ates who sup­port them. When es­tab­lish­ment-backed Amer­ic­an Cross­roads in­ves­ted in a race, for ex­ample, Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates didn’t have to fret about the group’s own agenda. They do when AFP gets in­volved.

It’s is not the only group with a policy per­spect­ive to in­volve it­self in cam­paigns — Club for Growth, a force on Cap­it­ol Hill le­gis­la­tion, routinely runs TV ads in races. But the in­cred­ible amount of money be­ing spent by AFP, roughly $30 mil­lion already this elec­tion, puts them front and cen­ter in a way no oth­er out­side group can match.

For Demo­crats, it’s an­oth­er way to push back against a group that has drowned its in­cum­bent sen­at­ors in ads. And it’s not just in Louisi­ana where the party is us­ing AFP’s policy agenda against the Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates.

In North Car­o­lina, a spokes­wo­man for Sen. Kay Hagan’s cam­paign called AFP’s more than $8 mil­lion in TV ads a “post-Cit­izens United quid pro quo” for Thom Tillis, the GOP front-run­ner who as state House speak­er helped pass an agenda backed by the con­ser­vat­ive out­side group.

“In Raleigh, Tillis has shown his al­le­gi­ance to AFP’s dan­ger­ous for North Car­o­lina, spe­cial in­terest agenda, and now they are re­turn­ing the fa­vor by try­ing to buy him a U.S. Sen­ate seat,” said Sad­ie Wein­er, the Hagan cam­paign spokes­wo­man.

What We're Following See More »
WITH LIVE BLOGGING
Trump Deposition Video Is Online
21 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

The video of Donald Trump's deposition in his case against restaurateur Jeffrey Zakarian is now live. Slate's Jim Newell and Josh Voorhees are live-blogging it while they watch.

Source:
SOUND LEVEL AFFECTED
Debate Commission Admits Issues with Trump’s Mic
22 hours ago
THE LATEST

The Commission on Presidential Debates put out a statement today that gives credence to Donald Trump's claims that he had a bad microphone on Monday night. "Regarding the first debate, there were issues regarding Donald Trump's audio that affected the sound level in the debate hall," read the statement in its entirety.

Source:
TRUMP VS. CHEFS
Trump Deposition Video to Be Released
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A video of Donald Trump testifying under oath about his provocative rhetoric about Mexicans and other Latinos is set to go public" as soon as today. "Trump gave the testimony in June at a law office in Washington in connection with one of two lawsuits he filed last year after prominent chefs reacted to the controversy over his remarks by pulling out of plans to open restaurants at his new D.C. hotel. D.C. Superior Court Judge Brian Holeman said in an order issued Thursday evening that fears the testimony might show up in campaign commercials were no basis to keep the public from seeing the video."

Source:
A CANDIDATE TO BE ‘PROUD’ OF
Chicago Tribune Endorses Gary Johnson
1 days ago
THE LATEST

No matter that his recall of foreign leaders leaves something to be desired, Gary Johnson is the choice of the Chicago Tribune's editorial board. The editors argue that Donald Trump couldn't do the job of president, while hitting Hillary Clinton for "her intent to greatly increase federal spending and taxation, and serious questions about honesty and trust." Which leaves them with Johnson. "Every American who casts a vote for him is standing for principles," they write, "and can be proud of that vote. Yes, proud of a candidate in 2016."

NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
×